Courts Squash Democrats’ ‘Most Secure Election’ Lie:

So many errors in that post. Too many to count.
But according to court records, people at the Capitol were arrested with loaded firearms, and plead guilty to bringing firearms to the insurrection.
Wrong. Some people had firearms near the Capitol, but not in the Capitol or on the Capitol grounds, in violation of DC law but in compliance with the 2nd Amendment.
 
Actually none of the security issues you mentioned apply to election machines, since every machine is certified, and not on an external network. They only use on demand internet connections (not full time), and then only to upload voting data to speed statewide tabulation. The official vote tabulation is done hours (or days later) by physical transportation of the voting records to where the tabulations are accumulated.
You don't understand much about networking, do you? The Internet IS an external network and they can't do on-demand Internet if they don't have a connection. There is absolutely zero reason for a voting machine to make a request to the Internet so the reason for the connection must be for an external computer to request to connect to the voting machine.

It would be far more secure if voting machines had no network connection of any kind. They should have duplicate or triplicate drives for their operating system and separate duplicate or triplicate mirrored drives for data. Prior to beginning the count, in a public, witnessed, setting, the data drives should be proven to be blank. The operating system drives should be cloned and given to interested parties such as to both major political party, even one to every party that has someone on the ballot.

They're very easy to secure.
 
The US Supreme Court also ruled last month, that the Congress must explicitly delegate a specific decision or authority and that they can't generally delegate power to make any just any regulation they wish.
But that's just what they did, they delegated decision authority, without specifics.

Example: Under Pennsylvania's Emergency Management Services Code, the Governor is empowered to declare states of emergency and exercise broad authority, including issuing executive orders with the force of law.

The clear text of the law allowed the Governor to write new law by executive order.

The courts said the legislatures erred by delegating without specificity.
 
The election had 100% integrity. You are the one who has no integrity.
Are you just gurgitating idiocy or do you have some knowledge, technical, indirect, direct, news research, something you read, anything at all to back up your comments or are you just noise?
 
The legislature did not ban the practice. If they disagreed with the decision of the election commission then they could have passed legislation banning it.
They did pass legislation banning it. Everything is banned except for what they explicitly authorized.
 
Wrong. Some people had firearms near the Capitol, but not in the Capitol or on the Capitol grounds, in violation of DC law but in compliance with the 2nd Amendment.
Then read the court record. One of the insurrectionists with a loaded Taurus handgun, with three shotgun shells, and two bullets, plead guilty to having it on capitol property.

In short, he declared under penalty of perjury he brought a loaded firearm onto the capitol.
 
They were funding new drop boxes for post offices that could be used by voters of either party.

Again, you think it's something that it's not.
The dropboxes served one purpose and the videos prove it: they were placed so that mules could come in during the night and stuff them with ballots.
 
You don't understand much about networking, do you? The Internet IS an external network and they can't do on-demand Internet if they don't have a connection.
I hate to have to point out how ridiculous that statement is, because most people have on-demand internet access. The connection through their ISP requires their modem and router to be turned on, in order to connect.

And voting machines had the devices needed to connect to the internet turned OFF. Except to upload the vote tabulations.
 
Nope, if 2020 was not valid, no election after it can ever be valid. If 2020 is not valid nobody in Congress should be running for reelection, all should be out. Those in the Senate that won in 2020 have to be kicked out and theri seats voted for again, or any election cannot be valid.

Oh, and this goes for the state level as well since they were all on the same ballots
Those are all true statements. It's sort of like if your wife cheated on you. Your vows are pretty much over. But if she repents and doesn't do it again, you can get over it and move on... You want that. It's not perfect but it's better than the alternatives.
 
The governor does if the legislature delegates that authority. Every court has so far agreed.
The Supreme Court just ruled that delegation has to be explicit and specific. Prove that any legislature has allowed the Governor to change the manner of voting.
 
The election had 100% integrity.
That's just a stupid, stupid thing to say.
I hate to have to point out how ridiculous that statement is, because most people have on-demand internet access. The connection through their ISP requires their modem and router to be turned on, in order to connect.

And voting machines had the devices needed to connect to the internet turned OFF. Except to upload the vote tabulations.
You make a lot of assertions you can't possibly support.

Sounds to me like you're spewing partisan garbage
 
Re: Only the legislature can change the voting laws .

While this is true. Legislatures often delegate regulation to subordinate bodies. The legislatures also granted the governor "emergency powers" making it a matter of opinion the limits of those emergency powers.

Under Pennsylvania's Emergency Management Services Code, the Governor is empowered to declare states of emergency and exercise broad authority, including issuing executive orders with the force of law.
Doesn't make him the legislature.
 
There is absolutely zero reason for a voting machine to make a request to the Internet so the reason for the connection must be for an external computer to request to connect to the voting machine.

It would be far more secure if voting machines had no network connection of any kind.
You apparently haven't dealt with large networks. Ever since the late 1990's microsoft included tools to allow remote access to computers for the purpose of remote troubleshooting, software or parameter updates, and monitoring of remote computers.

Things like remote desktop required confirmation to allow the connection. This was since obsolesced by enterprise software tools.

But when it came to voting machines, the connection devices to the internet was kept powered off, except when Dominion or other administrative overseer, requested they turn the access on.

The other time it was turned on, was to upload election day tabulations to the secretary of states (or election boards) systems.
 
15th post
You apparently haven't dealt with large networks. Ever since the late 1990's microsoft included tools to allow remote access to computers for the purpose of remote troubleshooting, software or parameter updates, and monitoring of remote computers.

Things like remote desktop required confirmation to allow the connection. This was since obsolesced by enterprise software tools.

But when it came to voting machines, the connection devices to the internet was kept powered off, except when Dominion or other administrative overseer, requested they turn the access on.

The other time it was turned on, was to upload election day tabulations to the secretary of states (or election boards) systems.
You pretend like you know what you're talking about

You don't

Your leftard excuses are just that.
 
The legislature did not ban the practice. If they disagreed with the decision of the election commission then they could have passed legislation banning it.
They did pass legislation banning it. Everything is banned except for what they explicitly authorized.
Actually legislatures didn't start doing that until after the 2020 election.
 
The dropboxes served one purpose and the videos prove it: they were placed so that mules could come in during the night and stuff them with ballots.
Maybe you aren't familiar with post office boxes. They are completely unmonitored, and allow mules to stuff them 24/7 with ballots. And that's perfectly legal.
 
Back
Top Bottom