Could Trump actually beat Hillary in a debate?

[basquebromance]

WASHINGTON IS CORRUPT BROKEN THEY'RE ALL LOSERS AND TRUMP CAN FIX IT! WASHINGTON IS CORRUPT BROKEN THEY'RE ALL LOSERS AND TRUMP CAN FIX IT! WASHINGTON IS CORRUPT BROKEN THEY'RE ALL LOSERS AND TRUMP CAN FIX IT!

 

[basquebromance]

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE GETTING CRUSHED UNDER THE OBAMA-CLINTON ECONOMY!

 

[basquebromance]

OBAMACARE IS COMMUNISM!

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]

GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX! THE REAL GOAL IS COMMUNISM!

 

[Deleted member 53821]

I hope so. I would love for Trump to beat that ***** silly in a debate. I'm sure Trump will be accused of hitting a lady but she is no lady. The minute Donald punchers her her vagina would open up to reveal many spiked teeth on the edges and swallow him whole. It would burp afterword as well.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[blastoff]

I'd take Trump in that matchup all day long. He'd eviscerate her one-on-one and likely bag a lot of style points while doing so.

Trump is a very smart guy. He has controlled everything since the day he announced his candidacy. With no political experience whatsoever, he's outfoxed a field of politicians of varying degrees of seasoning and a physician. And anyone who thinks all that's by accident is a fool. Trump plans the work and then works the plan, business-like. So what's he do if he does get the chance to have Hillary alone on a stage in front of millions of viewers?

It wouldn't surprise me if he went right at her character the first opening she gave him. Trump knows when polled the first word to come to peoples' minds regarding Hillary is liar, followed closely by untrustworthy. So imagine a scenario after Hillary makes some statement about this, that, or whatever that Trump could shoot back with something like, "No one's gonna believe that, Hillary. You know, you've got a probem with a lot of Americans. They think you're a liar, that you're untrustworthy, and with good reason. Lying to the parents and loved ones of our four dead Americans in Benghazi was a terrible thing to do. You lied to them; they're on record about that. So the question voters ask themselves is what won't she lie to us about? And her husband, he wags his finger in our faces when he lies to us. They're both liars; you can't believe anything..."

Trump will beat her like a drum and he's got a big menu of issues to choose from, just depends where she'll leave herself wide open for him to pounce.

Some of you Hillary lovers ought to recall how Trump shut her fat ass up a few weeks back after she played the sexism card on him. He went right after Willie's checkered womanizing past and reminded everyone how well Mrs. Clinton played the First Enabler role. And there was zero effective return fire from Hillary's camp in response, but a nice bonus came of it. Shortly afterwards while stumping for his dear wife, slick Willie actually had to face reporters' questions about his sleazy history with the ladies, and he looked like a complete fool trying to respond. It's great video. The guy who can talk forever on the most inane of subjects was agape, and clearly peeved his media immunity from such questioning has obviously expired so he can expect more in the future if his old lady steps in it again.

Be a fun debate so I sure hope it happens.

 

[dannyboys]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.

I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last ******* piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with ******* idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.

 

[mudwhistle]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

All he has to do is mention all the bribes he knows she took.

 

[mudwhistle]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

If Megyn Kelly put fear into his heart then I hate to see what Hillary Clinton would do, and I wounder would he even debate her or just hold rallies and tell his supporters there is no need for a debate?

Megyn Kelly didn’t scare him.

He just didn't want to have to dress her ass down on national television.

Megyn Kelly pisses people off. Remember, she's the one that insisted Santa Claus was white and caught HE double hockey sticks for it. I stopped watching her show because she always sounds pissed off. I'd rather watch a movie.

 

[dannyboys]

Donald Trump to the moderator: Hey George, are you ever gonna ask the beast why she is the most hated politician in the country as we speak?

hill to the mod hey george ever going to ask him how much 3 marriages cost??

"Hey George are you ever going to ask her why she intimidated and slandered the women Bill predated upon?"

 

[Jackson]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.

I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last ******* piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with ******* idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.

That's very nice to hear. I hope he does that well, if he indeed turns out to be the nominee. But, can he stop with the self promoting accolades long enough to get into detail? Can he stop focusing on himself rather than the goal he has set for himself? I think he has improved and brought down the banter of irrelevant details, but not yet does he have the impression if being presidential.

 

[Jackson]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

If Megyn Kelly put fear into his heart then I hate to see what Hillary Clinton would do, and I wounder would he even debate her or just hold rallies and tell his supporters there is no need for a debate?

Megyn Kelly didn’t scare him.

He just didn't want to have to dress her ass down on national television.

Megyn Kelly pisses people off. Remember, she's the one that insisted Santa Claus was white and caught HE double hockey sticks for it. I stopped watching her show because she always sounds pissed off. I'd rather watch a movie.

I haven't watched Fox since that debate. I don't think Kelly scared him either..it pissed him off big time. And the Fox brand was then tarnished. Ailes should have remembered, "the customer is always right" especially when you are pandering to an audience. He could have still supported Kelly but found different moderators for the following debate.

 

[eddiew]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.

I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last ******* piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with ******* idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.

That's very nice to hear. I hope he does that well, if he indeed turns out to be the nominee. But, can he stop with the self promoting accolades long enough to get into detail? Can he stop focusing on himself rather than the goal he has set for himself? I think he has improved and brought down the banter of irrelevant details, but not yet does he have the impression if being presidential.

His last words at the last debate if I'm not in error were "we're going to win win win win A real blowhard

 

[Jackson]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.

I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last ******* piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with ******* idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.

That's very nice to hear. I hope he does that well, if he indeed turns out to be the nominee. But, can he stop with the self promoting accolades long enough to get into detail? Can he stop focusing on himself rather than the goal he has set for himself? I think he has improved and brought down the banter of irrelevant details, but not yet does he have the impression if being presidential.

His last words at the last debate if I'm not in error were "we're going to win win win win A real blowhard

Claiming "We're going to WIN! is not being a blowhard, eddie, it is riling up the troops to get them to work for the candidate.

 

[dannyboys]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.

I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last ******* piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with ******* idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.

That's very nice to hear. I hope he does that well, if he indeed turns out to be the nominee. But, can he stop with the self promoting accolades long enough to get into detail? Can he stop focusing on himself rather than the goal he has set for himself? I think he has improved and brought down the banter of irrelevant details, but not yet does he have the impression if being presidential.

His last words at the last debate if I'm not in error were "we're going to win win win win A real blowhard

You would prefer a candidate who would say: "We are maybe going to win"?
That's what's gone wrong with America thanks to pansy-assed LIB pajama-boy ******* LIB cowards.
They could see one of their own in Obama. 'Vaguely gay, 'lead from behind' Socialist.

 

[eddiew]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.

I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last ******* piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with ******* idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.

That's very nice to hear. I hope he does that well, if he indeed turns out to be the nominee. But, can he stop with the self promoting accolades long enough to get into detail? Can he stop focusing on himself rather than the goal he has set for himself? I think he has improved and brought down the banter of irrelevant details, but not yet does he have the impression if being presidential.

His last words at the last debate if I'm not in error were "we're going to win win win win A real blowhard

Claiming "We're going to WIN! is not being a blowhard, eddie, it is riling up the troops to get them to work for the candidate.

yeah and he's going to make america great AGAIN?? etc etc did he ever say how besides taking back trillions from china russia mexico etc etc ?? a wall

 

[Jackson]

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.

I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last ******* piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with ******* idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.

That's very nice to hear. I hope he does that well, if he indeed turns out to be the nominee. But, can he stop with the self promoting accolades long enough to get into detail? Can he stop focusing on himself rather than the goal he has set for himself? I think he has improved and brought down the banter of irrelevant details, but not yet does he have the impression if being presidential.

His last words at the last debate if I'm not in error were "we're going to win win win win A real blowhard

Claiming "We're going to WIN! is not being a blowhard, eddie, it is riling up the troops to get them to work for the candidate.

yeah and he's going to make america great AGAIN?? etc etc did he ever say how besides taking back trillions from china russia mexico etc etc ?? a wall

I don't think he said he was going to take trillions from China, Russia or Mexico.

 

[eddiew]

All he ever offers are platitudes with no substance. While I don't agree with Hillary on anything I don't think Trump could best her on substance. She would constantly be able to use one phrase that would keep Trump perpetually in defense mode, "Remember when you said......*insert liberal positions here*"

Clinton has perfected the deflection of a question that, if truth would be told, had a negative answer. She is a pro at debates, there is no doubt. She can turn any negative question into platitudes for herself.

At the same time, Trump would be a complete disaster in a debate. He doesn't have the vocabulary, instincts, or filter to stay away from appearing to look like what he is, an ego gone wrong.

The perfect person to debate her would have been Newt Gingrich. He could take any question, frame it properly as a history lesson and give superb answers. He would have gone after Clinton and come out on top.

I guess you have never sat at a negotiating table with Trump right?
Those that have will tell you Trump is always 100% prepared. He knows EVERYTHING down to the last ******* piece of wallboard costs.
President Trump will surround himself with the best experts on the planet who will give him honest detailed information. Then Trump will negotiate.
The LAST thing anyone would EVER do if they worked for Trump is give him information based on what they thought he wanted to hear. Not like in Obama's case. He surrounded himself with ******* idiot 'yes-women' and look what that bullshit has led to.
The fact is Trump will end up debating 'Lonesome Joe' who will be dragged on stage.
His entire political life can be defined as one endless 'Talking Point'.

That's very nice to hear. I hope he does that well, if he indeed turns out to be the nominee. But, can he stop with the self promoting accolades long enough to get into detail? Can he stop focusing on himself rather than the goal he has set for himself? I think he has improved and brought down the banter of irrelevant details, but not yet does he have the impression if being presidential.

His last words at the last debate if I'm not in error were "we're going to win win win win A real blowhard

You would prefer a candidate who would say: "We are maybe going to win"?
That's what's gone wrong with America thanks to pansy-assed LIB pajama-boy ******* LIB cowards.
They could see one of their own in Obama. 'Vaguely gay, 'lead from behind' Socialist.

Don't you get it ?? He's got nothing but insults Let him pull that crap on world leaders and see how far we go