Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm no fan of free college education, because there's a reason sloth is a sin and both the Founders and Reagan opposed it, and I'm absolutely against any new federal programs, but something like 65% of us figure this supply side tax cut gimmick has really worn itself out.
And four to eight years of Hillary is not gonna be change to believe in.
No, the GOP isn't planning on rebuilding the middle east. Lots of dems are deeply involved in government contracts. FDR's new deal extended the depression many years, we cannot spend our way to prosperity. Reagan became a conservative so obviously didn't share your thoughts about who he was.The War on Terrorism is the GOPs party's major policy. It involves rebuilding Middle Eastern nations like Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan - and it has been a terrible failure. It basically transfers money from taxpayers to defense industrial corporations, but the taxpayer gets nothing for it since the region has gotten less stable ever since we enacted the policy.
Here is my point. Rather than trying to rebuild Iraq (which is beyond Washington's power and budget), we could invest a portion of that money into education. It's not sloth if you are born poor but are given affordable education.
Ronald Reagan's family was poor and they were saved by FDR's New Deal. This is why Ronald Reagan started his political career as a democrat, and it's why he campaigned for Truman. If you can find it, pick up a copy of Ronald Reagan's autobiography, written largely before he became president. It's called "Where's the Rest of Me". In this book Reagan tells of how his family was rescued by the New Deal. It wasn't a handout because the Reagans used government help to better themselves. FDR saw the New Deal as an investment
in American Citizens. He didn't call Americans lazy. He had more faith in Americans than your party, which calls people lazy so it can justify policies that only subsidize and bailout the rich.
In short. You've been lied to. You should study the real history of Ronald Reagan. Please Turn off Talk Radio and FOX News.
How would that even be possible? The super delegates have made their choice regardless of the people's vote.It will be huge if Sanders wins New York. Clinton would become unravelled. Could get very interesting. Stay tuned.
I'm no fan of free college education, because there's a reason sloth is a sin and both the Founders and Reagan opposed it, and I'm absolutely against any new federal programs, but something like 65% of us figure this supply side tax cut gimmick has really worn itself out.
And four to eight years of Hillary is not gonna be change to believe in.
The War on Terrorism is the GOPs party's major policy. It involves rebuilding Middle Eastern nations like Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan - and it has been a terrible failure. It basically transfers money from taxpayers to defense industrial corporations, but the taxpayer gets nothing for it since the region has gotten less stable ever since we enacted the policy.
Here is my point. Rather than trying to rebuild Iraq (which is beyond Washington's power and budget), we could invest a portion of that money into education. It's not sloth if you are born poor but are given affordable education. Republicans don't get this. The Reason that other countries are surpassing in science and technology is because we no longer invest in this nation
Ronald Reagan's family was poor and they were saved by FDR's New Deal. This is why Ronald Reagan started his political career as a democrat, and it's why he campaigned for Truman. If you can find it, pick up a copy of Ronald Reagan's autobiography, written largely before he became president. It's called "Where's the Rest of Me". In this book Reagan tells of how his family was rescued by the New Deal. It wasn't a handout because the Reagans used government help to better themselves. FDR saw the New Deal as an investment
in American Citizens. He didn't call Americans lazy. He had more faith in Americans than your party, which calls people lazy so it can justify policies that only subsidize and bailout the rich.
In short. You've been lied to. You should study the real history of Ronald Reagan. Please Turn off Talk Radio and FOX News.
It will be huge if Sanders wins New York. Clinton would become unravelled. Could get very interesting. Stay tuned.
I'm no fan of free college education, because there's a reason sloth is a sin and both the Founders and Reagan opposed it, and I'm absolutely against any new federal programs, but something like 65% of us figure this supply side tax cut gimmick has really worn itself out.
And four to eight years of Hillary is not gonna be change to believe in.
The Superdelagates are free to switch at anytime prior to a candidate being nominated. That's what makes them so super. Literally. They are all party insiders, and almost all have ties to the Clinton machine. But they are party loyalists first. If Bernie gives the dems the best chance of winning, I would expect they'll do their jobs. Bernie's problem is really that Hillary has beaten him by 2.5 million votes, and she only needs to win just north of 650 more pledged delegates to win without the superdelgates.How would that even be possible? The super delegates have made their choice regardless of the people's vote.It will be huge if Sanders wins New York. Clinton would become unravelled. Could get very interesting. Stay tuned.
Bernie's a new dealer. A bit to the left of JFK, who would not cow to unions, but Hillary and Obama are to the right of JFK on econ issues.Imagine the party of JFK "ask not what your Country can do for you but what you can do for your Country" coming this close to nominating a socialist in fifty years. The democrat run education system has finally produced the generation it has been looking for. A generation of morons.
But that isn't what happens, and a bit on the Republican side too but to a much lessor degree. Hillary has been raking in the super delegate votes regardless of the voting pattern. There's no such thing as a pure democracy but this isn't even a representative system. The people didn't elect the super delegates.People on this board have been complaining that the dem's primary system is rigged, but it's actually not. It's not purely democratic, but America's not a pure democracy either. The candidate who earns the greatest % of voters in each state (and not necessarily nation wide because caucus states have fewer voters) should typically be the nominee. And WHAT COULD BE FAIRER? But, the superdelegates job would be to support the guy with big mo and the best chance
You have no clue. JFK lowered taxes. Hillary and obama are to the right of that? Bernie is a bit to the left? A bit to the left of ask not what your country can do for you?Bernie's a new dealer. A bit to the left of JFK, who would not cow to unions, but Hillary and Obama are to the right of JFK on econ issues.Imagine the party of JFK "ask not what your Country can do for you but what you can do for your Country" coming this close to nominating a socialist in fifty years. The democrat run education system has finally produced the generation it has been looking for. A generation of morons.
I think Bernie would be winning this thing but for he's having such a damn good time. Imagine being 74 and having kids treating you like a rock star. The last thing you'd want to do is start acting like a parent, but that's precisely what he needs to do to beat Hillary. Be the person all democrats would be proud to support.
God knows the gop's closet person is Kasich and he's as excited as ..... Ohio.
yes he can and Hillary can------but neither well be president <<< from the ORACLE AT USMB-----me...rosie
Sure, but remember how the superdelegates abandoned her with Obama. She's a party insider and Bernie is not. But first and foremost, the superdelegates want a dem potus. If she's taking on water like the Exxon Valdez, a maj of superdelegates will turn on her faster than Exxon turned on that drunk captain. LOLBut that isn't what happens, and a bit on the Republican side too but to a much lessor degree. Hillary has been raking in the super delegate votes regardless of the voting pattern. There's no such thing as a pure democracy but this isn't even a representative system. The people didn't elect the super delegates.People on this board have been complaining that the dem's primary system is rigged, but it's actually not. It's not purely democratic, but America's not a pure democracy either. The candidate who earns the greatest % of voters in each state (and not necessarily nation wide because caucus states have fewer voters) should typically be the nominee. And WHAT COULD BE FAIRER? But, the superdelegates job would be to support the guy with big mo and the best chance
JFK lowered taxes from NINTY PERCENT. LOLYou have no clue. JFK lowered taxes. Hillary and obama are to the right of that? Bernie is a bit to the left? A bit to the left of ask not what your country can do for you?Bernie's a new dealer. A bit to the left of JFK, who would not cow to unions, but Hillary and Obama are to the right of JFK on econ issues.Imagine the party of JFK "ask not what your Country can do for you but what you can do for your Country" coming this close to nominating a socialist in fifty years. The democrat run education system has finally produced the generation it has been looking for. A generation of morons.
I think Bernie would be winning this thing but for he's having such a damn good time. Imagine being 74 and having kids treating you like a rock star. The last thing you'd want to do is start acting like a parent, but that's precisely what he needs to do to beat Hillary. Be the person all democrats would be proud to support.
God knows the gop's closet person is Kasich and he's as excited as ..... Ohio.
Nope.
