comparing police to specially trained CIA and FBI agents is a bit disingenuous.
With MB? MB was a freakin criminal that tried to steal a cops gun and kill him with it. Those whole thing was a bunch of bullshit. And our own President sending aids to his funeral WITHOUT the facts? THAT was reflection. Kinda like castile. People screaming "kill whitey" and the cop was a fuckin latino. But I digress..
Castille is a real issue. That shit shouldn't happen. However, people make mistakes. Putting unattainable standards on people doesn't help ANYTHING. But they STILL should be brought to justice. killing and burning down the lives of innocent people? That is savagery. And stupidity.
Another good example of stupidity is people screaming about equality and wanting the federal government to fix it when the fed gov is the one that legislated the inequality.
Like I said, REAL issues.
IDK fly, I hate the division. I hate the hate. I guess it is natural though.. I hope one day humans evolve past irrational fears.
I compared them because if top policing forces can be trained to not shoot to kill, why not the police? Is it because the average man's life does not matter but capturing terrorist for information does?
I do agree the Federal Government play a large role in sustaining corruption in the criminal justice system. I am also tired of the hate and even more tired that in 2016 race and the color of someone skins causes people to see them as a threat and devalue their life.
I appreciate you sharing your opinions with me. Please can you take a few mins to complete my survey so i can convey these views in my research?
Who's getting trained to shoot to wound?
I know in the UK police and military forces are trained to shoot to wound but recognise UK issues differ due to firearms not being legal. I have been told by a U.S. solider who fought in Iraq and someone who worked for a private contractor in Iraq they were told to shoot to wound in certain cases to capture prisoners for questioning. Though i have read it is not always scientifically feasible to shoot to wound, I question why the statistics reveal more ethnic minorities carry weapons are killed by the police than their white counterparts. Is it because the police immediately shoot to kill ethnic minorities or should we really believe ethnic minorities are fundamentally more dangerous when given a firearm?
Apparently they are more dangerous.
When 7% of the population commits 52% of the murders in this country there's an obvious problem.
comparing police to specially trained CIA and FBI agents is a bit disingenuous.
With MB? MB was a freakin criminal that tried to steal a cops gun and kill him with it. Those whole thing was a bunch of bullshit. And our own President sending aids to his funeral WITHOUT the facts? THAT was reflection. Kinda like castile. People screaming "kill whitey" and the cop was a fuckin latino. But I digress..
Castille is a real issue. That shit shouldn't happen. However, people make mistakes. Putting unattainable standards on people doesn't help ANYTHING. But they STILL should be brought to justice. killing and burning down the lives of innocent people? That is savagery. And stupidity.
Another good example of stupidity is people screaming about equality and wanting the federal government to fix it when the fed gov is the one that legislated the inequality.
Like I said, REAL issues.
IDK fly, I hate the division. I hate the hate. I guess it is natural though.. I hope one day humans evolve past irrational fears.
I compared them because if top policing forces can be trained to not shoot to kill, why not the police? Is it because the average man's life does not matter but capturing terrorist for information does?
I do agree the Federal Government play a large role in sustaining corruption in the criminal justice system. I am also tired of the hate and even more tired that in 2016 race and the color of someone skins causes people to see them as a threat and devalue their life.
I appreciate you sharing your opinions with me. Please can you take a few mins to complete my survey so i can convey these views in my research?
Who's getting trained to shoot to wound?
I know in the UK police and military forces are trained to shoot to wound but recognise UK issues differ due to firearms not being legal. I have been told by a U.S. solider who fought in Iraq and someone who worked for a private contractor in Iraq they were told to shoot to wound in certain cases to capture prisoners for questioning. Though i have read it is not always scientifically feasible to shoot to wound, I question why the statistics reveal more ethnic minorities carry weapons are killed by the police than their white counterparts. Is it because the police immediately shoot to kill ethnic minorities or should we really believe ethnic minorities are fundamentally more dangerous when given a firearm?
Going by US crime statistics, yes.
There is an obvious problem looking at those statistics. If that is the case the next question to address is why do African-Americans commit more murders? Broken communities? And does that give the police reason to see every African-american as a reasonable threat?
Expanded Homicide Data Table 6
The above link reveals whites commit more homicides of African-Americans than African-Americans murder whites. Does this mean African-Americans should fear white people?
I am making the point that statistics can reveal a lot, and often contradictory things. Nevertheless, i do not think it grants law enforcement agents the permission to kill African-Americans because statistically they are more likely to murder.
Those statistics should be used to ask the question "why?" in order to implement change.