flacaltenn
Diamond Member
Yes.
So what? the ultimate DECISION SHOULD BE up to the governors.. And this is NOT a fucking "victory dance".. It's REASONED "risk analysis"....
A poorly reasoned analysis.
You have no reason to think that.. The governors are weighing stuff that hasn't even crossed your TDS riddled mind.. For instance, TN IS on "lock down".. Was on a mass phone town hall with my Congressman. He laid on us that just ONE rural county in TN YESTERDAY -- had 8 suicides.. NO MENTION of that on local news or elsewhere.. The lock-down ITSELF IS DEADLY... Especially if no one can find the "reboot" switch for 6 or 8 months. Or China stops buying our debt..
Ever see the suicide curve for the Great Depression??? Makes the 1 or 2% CVID death rate look like minor skirmish...You have no reason to think that
I have every reason to think so. These governors are acting later than their counterparts who are ahead of them and still struggling. Any idiot should be able to see that as a problem.
How many TOTAL COVID cases in Iowa? North Dakota? You go look at the map I posted for the County by County map in the sticky section of Current Events and get back to me on this.. Go tell me what the TOTAL ACCUMULATED COVID "reported" in those 8 states has been..
If a state has ACCUMULATED less than a couple dozen COVID cases over 2 months since they started the tally, REASON and common sense says the risk is minimal enough to NOT cause a halt to EVERYTHING in the economy in that state...