Lord Long Rod
Diamond Member
- Jan 17, 2023
- 7,706
- 8,114
- 2,138
- Banned
- #1
This report does not surprise me. First, it is well documented that male fertility is on the decline amongst the young ones. Reasons for worldwide decline in male fertility - PubMed
Some blame this on environmental toxins and the food we eat. The former is most likely leftist drivel. The latter is curious since people are supposedly eating more healthy than we did in the past.
Perhaps it has something to do with social factors, such as young men subordinating themselves to young, woke white women. They definitely curdle my cream.
Whatever the cause, we know that our young wokesters are more apt to be shooting blanks that the older generations. Perhaps that is a good thing resulting from social Darwinism.
We also should not overlook the obvious. With the western trend toward sexual deviancy (homo/trans acceptance, it is inevitable that birth numbers will decline. You simply cannot grow a baby by fertilizing a prostate.
As mentioned in the article, population control is a distinctly leftist authoritarian component. Instead of embracing capitalism, where economic growth is infinite, they seek to manage resources by reducing the number of people that need to be taken care of. Personally, I am not ok living like a rat in a cage waiting to be fed. That is not the American way. But today’s young people seem to be perfectly fine with it.
Why do youngsters denigrate their individualism by embracing destructive leftist ideology. Yes, they are being force-fed this garbage in government schools, which are full-fledged leftist indoctrination machines.
But I also blame the parents. When I was 16-17 years old, for example, my parents told me that I needed to figure shit out because I was about to turn 18 and they expected to shift their resources away from taking care of me to retiring and moving away. When I was 18 I was on my own, and I figured shit out.
But kids today are not subjected to this kind of parenting anymore. Instead, parents are crippling their children by making them dependent. This makes them particularly susceptible to leftist indoctrination.
In a Darwinist way, lowered fertility is appropriate because we do not want people who cannot take care of themselves. These people seem to believe that the NEED to be taken care of. Thus, what would once have been considered a shameful and needy existence has now become acceptable. They want to be told what to do. They are, thus, fine with the slippery slope of totalitarianism.
They think it will be fine. But it won’t. Democratic Socialism is completely unworkable in practice. It is also morally wrong (I.e., living off the sweat of others, like a parasite).
Therefore, nature is trying to correct this malignancy by getting rid of the helpless by vacuuming out the shallow end of the gene pool. This is, in itself, proof of the detrimental consequence of authoritarianism; it maintains the weak and weakens the strong. This is distinctly anti-natural.
To be blunt, the world cannot, and will not, be ruled by woke white women and skinny-leg blue jean wearing hipsters. It is simply not a possibility. It will be ruled either by strong individualism or obscene authoritarianism. A third option is a mix of the 2 states, most likely resulting in a Cold War scenario similar to what we had in the last century following the end of WWII.
www.americanthinker.com
Some blame this on environmental toxins and the food we eat. The former is most likely leftist drivel. The latter is curious since people are supposedly eating more healthy than we did in the past.
Perhaps it has something to do with social factors, such as young men subordinating themselves to young, woke white women. They definitely curdle my cream.
Whatever the cause, we know that our young wokesters are more apt to be shooting blanks that the older generations. Perhaps that is a good thing resulting from social Darwinism.
We also should not overlook the obvious. With the western trend toward sexual deviancy (homo/trans acceptance, it is inevitable that birth numbers will decline. You simply cannot grow a baby by fertilizing a prostate.
As mentioned in the article, population control is a distinctly leftist authoritarian component. Instead of embracing capitalism, where economic growth is infinite, they seek to manage resources by reducing the number of people that need to be taken care of. Personally, I am not ok living like a rat in a cage waiting to be fed. That is not the American way. But today’s young people seem to be perfectly fine with it.
Why do youngsters denigrate their individualism by embracing destructive leftist ideology. Yes, they are being force-fed this garbage in government schools, which are full-fledged leftist indoctrination machines.
But I also blame the parents. When I was 16-17 years old, for example, my parents told me that I needed to figure shit out because I was about to turn 18 and they expected to shift their resources away from taking care of me to retiring and moving away. When I was 18 I was on my own, and I figured shit out.
But kids today are not subjected to this kind of parenting anymore. Instead, parents are crippling their children by making them dependent. This makes them particularly susceptible to leftist indoctrination.
In a Darwinist way, lowered fertility is appropriate because we do not want people who cannot take care of themselves. These people seem to believe that the NEED to be taken care of. Thus, what would once have been considered a shameful and needy existence has now become acceptable. They want to be told what to do. They are, thus, fine with the slippery slope of totalitarianism.
They think it will be fine. But it won’t. Democratic Socialism is completely unworkable in practice. It is also morally wrong (I.e., living off the sweat of others, like a parasite).
Therefore, nature is trying to correct this malignancy by getting rid of the helpless by vacuuming out the shallow end of the gene pool. This is, in itself, proof of the detrimental consequence of authoritarianism; it maintains the weak and weakens the strong. This is distinctly anti-natural.
To be blunt, the world cannot, and will not, be ruled by woke white women and skinny-leg blue jean wearing hipsters. It is simply not a possibility. It will be ruled either by strong individualism or obscene authoritarianism. A third option is a mix of the 2 states, most likely resulting in a Cold War scenario similar to what we had in the last century following the end of WWII.
COVID lockdowns brought baby booms in red states -- and baby busts in blue ones -study
The left has always been big on population control, all to save the planet. No wonder then, that they liked COVID lockdowns, keeping those schools closed and those mask and social distancing requirements in place, long after the danger had pa...
