thanks for sharing
What happened to the scholarly papers? The peer reviewed studies? The technical journals? All you seem to have is more crap.
Isn't it funny when deniers provide a slew of sources and they're ALL opinions from blogs or certified rw rags lol?
It's less funny when obtuse emotional hacks ignore data (yes, ignore, as in unable to refute) that opposes their ideology/religion. Res Ipsa Loquitur.
You may note, or may not, that none of the recent climate change drones hereon have been able to refute contrarian data. All the got is emotional dismissal.
They are unable to debate this issue. All they got is the IPCC. Know what the "I" stand for in IPCC? Intergovernmental. For most of us, that tells us all we need to know. But for the uninitiated, it means a pool of pro-government, government-sponsored activists pushing an agenda (they revere and worship this body by calling it "peer review" which is nothing more than the choir singing to itself.). And these idiots question and dispute any data that challenges...they dismiss it outright as evidenced by recent posts on this forum, because they cannot debate the issue on the merits. Dismiss and ridicule, rather than explore and debate. Who has posted recent data that contradicts the IPCC? Me. And how do the drones reply? Well, they don't respond to the data, they instead use Stalin tactics and attempt to diminish the messenger. Weak as hell, but the low-information voter knoweth not the difference.
Know what the IPCC mission statement says? Their acolytes on tis forum certainly don't. It states that they "synthesis and integrate data for policymakers." PROOF it is a government program for politicians.
And these guys here, pretending to be defenders of the good fight, are merely carrying water for pro-government politicians.
So, the drones cite "scholarly" and "peer review" as if they have a clue what they are talking about.
And while they dismiss the opposition in pursuit of their goal, they illustrate in open forum an inability to discuss the actual issue. Their only play is the dismiss and ridicule. Which makes them intellectually weak.
The utter HYPOCRISY is that they talk about advancing science as the truth, but act in every way intolerant of large portions of the body of knowledge.