Convicted of sex crimes as a man, Iowan no longer deemed threat because of gender change to a woman!

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

He is defending the indefensible.
Your hysteria is beyond stupid. Where the **** did I defend this creep? My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender. What part of that do you not understand?

This is your typical MO PP, that when someone is defending children from these child RAPISTS or when someone is saying that young children should NOT be subjected to all the LGBTQ Agenda crap you accuse that person of getting "hysterical"

"My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender."

You have missed the ENTIRE point of this OP article, you have missed that this creature has DELIBERATELY USED the Transgender excuse to somehow convince a group of idiots who are probably more concerned with NOT offending anyone to release this child RAPIST back into the public.
It's you who misses the point. See post 74
He multiple MOLESTED A ******* 7 YEAR OLD ..........you Freaking Loser....

He should have been released into prison population tagged with it..........We wouldn't be having this discussion anymore.

He abused and raped 15 children ALL under the age of 13 years in age and the youngest was a baby aged 1 months in age, this is a very dangerous sexual predator who was ALREADY on the Iowa Sex Offender Registry and has used the Transgender EXCUSE to get out of prison when in fact he is a fully functioning male, this is not only beyond sick it's beyond dangerous to allow such a child predator out onto the streets.
 
This is your typical MO PP, that when someone is defending children from these child RAPISTS or when someone is saying that young children should NOT be subjected to all the LGBTQ Agenda crap you accuse that person of getting "hysterical"

"My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender."

You have missed the ENTIRE point of this OP article, you have missed that this creature has DELIBERATELY USED the Transgender excuse to somehow convince a group of idiots who are probably more concerned with NOT offending anyone to release this child RAPIST back into the public.
It's you who misses the point. See post 74
He multiple MOLESTED A ******* 7 YEAR OLD ..........you Freaking Loser....

He should have been released into prison population tagged with it..........We wouldn't be having this discussion anymore.

I thought I read he molested a 1 year old too. Not surprising that this demented freak would try to claim he is a woman.

He did his youngest victim was a baby aged 1 years in age.

OMG. If that was my baby, I would kill that man with my bare hands regardless of the consequences. That man would no longer exist to hurt ANY other children, and I would feel completely justified in killing him.

The same with me, I would kill him and so would Mr. Lucy if anyone touched any of our kidlets they would be greeted with a bullet and a permanent loss of access to oxygen.
 
It's you who misses the point. See post 74
He multiple MOLESTED A ******* 7 YEAR OLD ..........you Freaking Loser....

He should have been released into prison population tagged with it..........We wouldn't be having this discussion anymore.

I thought I read he molested a 1 year old too. Not surprising that this demented freak would try to claim he is a woman.

He did his youngest victim was a baby aged 1 years in age.

OMG. If that was my baby, I would kill that man with my bare hands regardless of the consequences. That man would no longer exist to hurt ANY other children, and I would feel completely justified in killing him.

The same with me, I would kill him and so would Mr. Lucy if anyone touched any of our kidlets they would be greeted with a bullet and a permanent loss of access to oxygen.

I would want to have the satisfaction of putting my bare hands around his neck and squeezing the life out of him.
 
Your hysteria is beyond stupid. Where the **** did I defend this creep? My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender. What part of that do you not understand?

This is your typical MO PP, that when someone is defending children from these child RAPISTS or when someone is saying that young children should NOT be subjected to all the LGBTQ Agenda crap you accuse that person of getting "hysterical"

"My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender."

You have missed the ENTIRE point of this OP article, you have missed that this creature has DELIBERATELY USED the Transgender excuse to somehow convince a group of idiots who are probably more concerned with NOT offending anyone to release this child RAPIST back into the public.
It's you who misses the point. See post 74
He multiple MOLESTED A ******* 7 YEAR OLD ..........you Freaking Loser....

He should have been released into prison population tagged with it..........We wouldn't be having this discussion anymore.

I thought I read he molested a 1 year old too. Not surprising that this demented freak would try to claim he is a woman.
I tried finding the original case........but google has it hidden....one thing bounced up over and over again.........Multiple molestation of a 7 year old............it did say molesting a baby as well.

Takes a Sick mind to do that at all.......Fitting that he can't decide his sex........because those of that sort are MENTAL AS WELL.............

To get out on parole earlier over the sex change is Ridiculous..........

I posted another article in my below post post #29 and if you read it I did a few Screen Shots from the article, you'll read about some of his 15 victims and where it says his youngest victim was a baby aged 1 year in age:

Convicted of sex crimes as a man, Iowan no longer deemed threat because of gender change to a woman!
 
He multiple MOLESTED A ******* 7 YEAR OLD ..........you Freaking Loser....

He should have been released into prison population tagged with it..........We wouldn't be having this discussion anymore.

I thought I read he molested a 1 year old too. Not surprising that this demented freak would try to claim he is a woman.

He did his youngest victim was a baby aged 1 years in age.

OMG. If that was my baby, I would kill that man with my bare hands regardless of the consequences. That man would no longer exist to hurt ANY other children, and I would feel completely justified in killing him.

The same with me, I would kill him and so would Mr. Lucy if anyone touched any of our kidlets they would be greeted with a bullet and a permanent loss of access to oxygen.

I would want to have the satisfaction of putting my bare hands around his neck and squeezing the life out of him.

Yes but it takes A LOT of strength and pressure to strangle someone like that, so he could possibly fight this off and then end up killing you and so in this situation a bullet would be more appropriate.
 
If I didn't think it would put victims in more danger, I would even say they should get the death penalty. :dunno: Unfortunately, one of the consequences of that may be more dead children, rather than molestation victims. Teaching kids that there are a lot of sexually permissive weirdos out there is one way to try to combat it.
The man was a mysogynist, and with enough women out there who also are mysogynists (hate members of their own sex), I'd say a chance that he is still a mysogynist after his "sex change" and that would not warrant his get-out-of-jail-free card he thinks he just earned by going under the knife. He's definitely :cuckoo:
 
I thought I read he molested a 1 year old too. Not surprising that this demented freak would try to claim he is a woman.

He did his youngest victim was a baby aged 1 years in age.

OMG. If that was my baby, I would kill that man with my bare hands regardless of the consequences. That man would no longer exist to hurt ANY other children, and I would feel completely justified in killing him.

The same with me, I would kill him and so would Mr. Lucy if anyone touched any of our kidlets they would be greeted with a bullet and a permanent loss of access to oxygen.

I would want to have the satisfaction of putting my bare hands around his neck and squeezing the life out of him.

Yes but it takes A LOT of strength and pressure to strangle someone like that, so he could possibly fight this off and then end up killing you and so in this situation a bullet would be more appropriate.

I would tie him to a chair anchored to the floor first, of course.
 
He did his youngest victim was a baby aged 1 years in age.

OMG. If that was my baby, I would kill that man with my bare hands regardless of the consequences. That man would no longer exist to hurt ANY other children, and I would feel completely justified in killing him.

The same with me, I would kill him and so would Mr. Lucy if anyone touched any of our kidlets they would be greeted with a bullet and a permanent loss of access to oxygen.

I would want to have the satisfaction of putting my bare hands around his neck and squeezing the life out of him.

Yes but it takes A LOT of strength and pressure to strangle someone like that, so he could possibly fight this off and then end up killing you and so in this situation a bullet would be more appropriate.

I would tie him to a chair anchored to the floor first, of course.

Talking of kidlets, I posted this:

Kid F Alert
 
Your hysteria is beyond stupid. Where the **** did I defend this creep? My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender. What part of that do you not understand?

You're explicitly defending the opposite point; in that you defend turning a very dangerous criminal loose, who never ought to be allowed the rest of his life to ever again draw a breath of free air, because he now claims to be “transgender”. This directly contradicts your claimed position that …she [sic] should not be treated differently because she [sic] is transgender.” If this subhuman, child-raping piece of shit wasn't claiming to be “transgender”, then he'd almost certainly be left rotting in prison for the rest of his wretched and worthless life.
 
This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

This is the most blatant that he's ever been about it, but it's not like he was ever doing a very good job of hiding who and what he is.
I wonder if he's a sock. That other guy..forgot his name..but he was all over this stuff giving excuses too. Creepy looking guy..I can see his mug in my head but his name escapes me. I wonder if he is back with a new name , i.e. PP.
DELTA4EMBASSY He was banned.

I am not sure he is you know, under his name it's not saying that he is just that he's not posted since December 17 2015:

View attachment 303690

^^^^ I got the above by in Search Forums typing "age of consent" and just allowing it to return every post with that in and almost straight away appears Delta4Embassy.
. . maybe it wasn't a perma-ban then. He had been for a little while last I heard.
 
Yes!!! That was him! Hmm....I wonder.....

I don't think they are the same poster. Personalities are way different, although both very odd.
Yeah, as sick and demented as D4 was, I don't remember him always going to vulgarity when arguing.

D4 also tended to start a lot of weird creepy threads particularly about children, age of consent and some other disturbing things.

I remember DELTA4EMBASSY now, but only after you mention his threads about children and the age of consent. I cannot though remember his avatar, but Gracie and others say it was of a creepy man.

I think it was a picture of himself! :lol: Yeah, he was kind of a weird looking dude. More dorky looking than creepy, IMO. I believe that is just one reason why pedos go after kids. They are social retards and cannot relate with people their own age. They go for children who don't know they are social retards.
IMO? It goes a lot deeper than that.

D4E also struck me as a call sign. I had always thought he was a spook pushing the agenda, these are same folks who were part of that cabal that Epstein was part of.

Most folks don't know that Epstein was an Israeli spy and part of the Mossad. :tinfoil:

I am ALWAYS suspicious of any poster that has a creepy avatar name with numbers or letters as part of their name, unless it is at the end like John234 and they just couldn't think of anything else . . . :71:

Think about it. . . DELTA 4 EMBASSY? Who does that?

Bond 007 :auiqs.jpg:
 
He multiple MOLESTED A ******* 7 YEAR OLD ..........you Freaking Loser....

He should have been released into prison population tagged with it..........We wouldn't be having this discussion anymore.

According to the article, his victims ranged from as old as thirteen years, to as young as only one year old. I don't know what the age distribution is within that range, but it means that on at least one occasion, he sexually molested a baby. Not even a toddler, but an infant.

What kind of subhuman piece of shit sexually abuses a baby? And what kind of subhuman piece of shit defends such a pervert, and defends ever allowing such a pervert to go free again?

TheOppressiveFaggot already has set a very, very low bar for human decency, with much of the crap that he defends and advocates; but even as low as the bar had been previously set, this is a new low even for him. It's not unexpected, however, given what he has made fairly obvious about some of his own proclivities.
 
Post some threads about them, and we will show you our outrage! A pedophile man claiming to be a woman is JUST as outrageous. This pervert is no woman, just a freaking weirdo!

If anything, this one is more dangerous. That he thinks he's a woman indicates a degree of mental defect beyond being a child rapist.
 
Seriously. This transgender nonsense has gone way too far.

Treating it as if it ever had any shred of credibility was going way too far.

Hard science does not bend to the insane delusions of mentally- and morally-defective freaks.

As a matter of hard, immutable, undeniable biological fact, a man is not a woman, a woman is not a man, and one cannot become the other. It takes a seriously-f•••ed-up mind, and a seriously-f•••ed-up soul, to find this at all confusing.
 
If I didn't think it would put victims in more danger, I would even say they should get the death penalty. :dunno: Unfortunately, one of the consequences of that may be more dead children, rather than molestation victims. Teaching kids that there are a lot of sexually permissive weirdos out there is one way to try to combat it.

Unfortunately, what we are allowing to be taught to our children is that there's nothing wrong or abnormal or dangerous about these sexually permissive weirdos. That's an agenda that the homosexual/transsexual/pedophile movement has been very successful in getting pushed into the public schools. Here in California, it's even a legal requirement for our public schools to teach brainwash children into this degenerate agenda.
 
Last edited:
15th post
See my post #92 though. There is the possibility that some would murder their victims to avoid such penalties, so there are no real easy answers. Teaching children to feel comfortable around sexual deviants is definitely not the answer though, IMO.

I really do not find that argument to be terribly compelling. It may once have been the case that murdering a victim increased a criminal's chances of getting away with that along with a lesser crime. With modern forensic technology, I don't think that the cliché really holds true so much any more, that “Dead men tell no tales.” A child being sexually abused might fail to come to the proper attention of those in a position to do anything about it, and if attention is called to the case, it might be difficult to prove that the child was actually molested and who was responsible. It's rather more difficult to hide the fact of a child being murdered than of a child being molested. A murdered child is pretty difficult to overlook, and tends to draw a very determined effort to bring the culprit to justice.
 
He is defending the indefensible.
Your hysteria is beyond stupid. Where the **** did I defend this creep? My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender. What part of that do you not understand?

This is your typical MO PP, that when someone is defending children from these child RAPISTS or when someone is saying that young children should NOT be subjected to all the LGBTQ Agenda crap you accuse that person of getting "hysterical"

"My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender."

You have missed the ENTIRE point of this OP article, you have missed that this creature has DELIBERATELY USED the Transgender excuse to somehow convince a group of idiots who are probably more concerned with NOT offending anyone to release this child RAPIST back into the public.
It's you who misses the point. See post 74
He multiple MOLESTED A ******* 7 YEAR OLD ..........you Freaking Loser....

He should have been released into prison population tagged with it..........We wouldn't be having this discussion anymore.

He abused and raped 15 children ALL under the age of 13 years in age and the youngest was a baby aged 1 months in age, this is a very dangerous sexual predator who was ALREADY on the Iowa Sex Offender Registry and has used the Transgender EXCUSE to get out of prison when in fact he is a fully functioning male, this is not only beyond sick it's beyond dangerous to allow such a child predator out onto the streets.

I think I would need to see the facts of each case. .

but. . . if I were the parents of the subsequent children that were raped and abused?

I would want to know why I could not sue the Judges and parole boards that realeased this guy onto the public and allowed him to rape and abuse my child.

I mean. . . after the third time, what is the STATE's excuse? :dunno:
 
You people sure pick the strangest things too get all bent out of shape over. She will be subject to lifetime supervisions as are the vast majority of sex offenders. Only the most dangerous are subject to civil commitment after serving their prison term. So what is different about this case? Oh let me guess. The transgender part?

We already know PP that you consider us all "bigots" for wanting to protect children from LGBTQ sex perverts who want to groom children so they can sexually abuse and rape them, which is exactly what this waste of human skin did to 15 children the youngest being just 1 years in age, but you know it's being a "bigot" NOT wanting a baby of 1 years in age to be RAPED by a Transgender freak who's a MAN who dresses up as a WOMAN because he's mentally deranged in the head.

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.
You're another ******* hysterical idiot. I'm not defending anyone. The crimes are despicable. She served her sentence and there is nothing in the article that indicated that she was released early because she is transgender.

There is a specific criteria for civil commitment following prison and apparently she does not meet that criteria. You dumb ***** are bouncing off the wall because of the transgender issue. If she were not trans, this thread would not even exist.
The point is that she should not be treated differently than anyone else. Your gripe should be with the states sentencing guidelines for sex offenders, not with me.

It appears he didn’t serve his full prison sentence, he was released from prison. They ARE treating him differently because he is pretending to be a woman. Otherwise he would had not been let free on the streets. They are claiming that lowered testosterone levels make it less likely he will rape children. He IS being allowed to walk free solely because of being “transgender”.

You are a liar and a sick demented asshole.

You're the one who is demented. It does not say that she was released from prison early. It says that the state opted not to pursue subsequent civil commitment because , because, as a woman she, did not pose a risk level that meets the criteria. There was no leniency based on being transgender.

I maintain the this outrage is all about her being trans. How many threads have there been about the majority of sex offenders who are men not being civilly committed after prison? None!

The pervert was just convicted in 2015. You think that is enough time for a convicted pedophile? He is NOT a woman, yet the state is playing along with that fantasy. If HE wasn’t playing games calling himself a “she”, the state would had left him in prison, or at least tried to have the mental nutcase committed. The article clearly shows they are treating him differently because he is a tranny.
 
This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

He is defending the indefensible.
Your hysteria is beyond stupid. Where the **** did I defend this creep? My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender. What part of that do you not understand?

This is your typical MO PP, that when someone is defending children from these child RAPISTS or when someone is saying that young children should NOT be subjected to all the LGBTQ Agenda crap you accuse that person of getting "hysterical"

"My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender."

You have missed the ENTIRE point of this OP article, you have missed that this creature has DELIBERATELY USED the Transgender excuse to somehow convince a group of idiots who are probably more concerned with NOT offending anyone to release this child RAPIST back into the public.
It's you who misses the point. See post 74
He multiple MOLESTED A ******* 7 YEAR OLD ..........you Freaking Loser....

He should have been released into prison population tagged with it..........We wouldn't be having this discussion anymore.

He should had been hanged. Child molesters deserve the death penalty.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom