Convicted of sex crimes as a man, Iowan no longer deemed threat because of gender change to a woman!

[iamwhatiseem]

I wonder if he's a sock. That other guy..forgot his name..but he was all over this stuff giving excuses too. Creepy looking guy..I can see his mug in my head but his name escapes me. I wonder if he is back with a new name , i.e. PP.

DELTA4EMBASSY He was banned.

Yes!!! That was him! Hmm....I wonder.....

I don't think they are the same poster. Personalities are way different, although both very odd.

Yeah, as sick and demented as D4 was, I don't remember him always going to vulgarity when arguing.

D4 also tended to start a lot of weird creepy threads particularly about children, age of consent and some other disturbing things.

He just might have been the only person I have ever reported to mods.
When he made comments about how he liked his grandaughters to sit on his lap in a thread about pedophiles... that was it. WTF made a person think of their grandchildren in a thread about child sex!

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

I wonder if he's a sock. That other guy..forgot his name..but he was all over this stuff giving excuses too. Creepy looking guy..I can see his mug in my head but his name escapes me. I wonder if he is back with a new name , i.e. PP.

DELTA4EMBASSY He was banned.

Yes!!! That was him! Hmm....I wonder.....

I don't think they are the same poster. Personalities are way different, although both very odd.

Yeah, as sick and demented as D4 was, I don't remember him always going to vulgarity when arguing.

D4 also tended to start a lot of weird creepy threads particularly about children, age of consent and some other disturbing things.

I remember DELTA4EMBASSY now, but only after you mention his threads about children and the age of consent. I cannot though remember his avatar, but Gracie and others say it was of a creepy man.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

DELTA4EMBASSY He was banned.

Yes!!! That was him! Hmm....I wonder.....

I don't think they are the same poster. Personalities are way different, although both very odd.

Yeah, as sick and demented as D4 was, I don't remember him always going to vulgarity when arguing.

D4 also tended to start a lot of weird creepy threads particularly about children, age of consent and some other disturbing things.

He just might have been the only person I have ever reported to mods.
When he made comments about how he liked his grandaughters to sit on his lap in a thread about pedophiles... that was it. WTF made a person think of their grandchildren in a thread about child sex!

"WTF made a person think of their grandchildren in a thread about child sex!"

Only a paedophile would think something so vile.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

This is the most blatant that he's ever been about it, but it's not like he was ever doing a very good job of hiding who and what he is.

I wonder if he's a sock. That other guy..forgot his name..but he was all over this stuff giving excuses too. Creepy looking guy..I can see his mug in my head but his name escapes me. I wonder if he is back with a new name , i.e. PP.

DELTA4EMBASSY He was banned.

I am not sure he is you know, under his name it's not saying that he is just that he's not posted since December 17 2015:

^^^^ I got the above by in Search Forums typing "age of consent" and just allowing it to return every post with that in and almost straight away appears Delta4Embassy.

 

[ChrisL]

This guy (PP) seems to stick mostly with the gay agenda. I don't have a problem with gays or gay marriage. As long as both parties are adults and consent to the situation, meh, I don't really care. I draw my line at the insane transgender agenda.

 

[ChrisL]

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

This is the most blatant that he's ever been about it, but it's not like he was ever doing a very good job of hiding who and what he is.

I wonder if he's a sock. That other guy..forgot his name..but he was all over this stuff giving excuses too. Creepy looking guy..I can see his mug in my head but his name escapes me. I wonder if he is back with a new name , i.e. PP.

DELTA4EMBASSY He was banned.

I am not sure he is you, under his name it's not saying that he is just that he's not posted since December 17 2015:

View attachment 303690

As far as I know, D4 felt that he was being bullied by people who didn't agree with his views on children and sexuality, and left this forum years ago.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

This guy (PP) seems to stick mostly with the gay agenda. I don't have a problem with gays or gay marriage. As long as both parties are adults and consent to the situation, meh, I don't really care. I draw my line at the insane transgender agenda.

PP says he is Heterosexual, he has been married for approx 30 years to a woman. This just makes things even more bizarro, I think he is Bisexual because he has this interest in males also.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

This is the most blatant that he's ever been about it, but it's not like he was ever doing a very good job of hiding who and what he is.

I wonder if he's a sock. That other guy..forgot his name..but he was all over this stuff giving excuses too. Creepy looking guy..I can see his mug in my head but his name escapes me. I wonder if he is back with a new name , i.e. PP.

DELTA4EMBASSY He was banned.

I am not sure he is you, under his name it's not saying that he is just that he's not posted since December 17 2015:

View attachment 303690

As far as I know, D4 felt that he was being bullied by people who didn't agree with his views on children and sexuality, and left this forum years ago.

Yes I think so.

 

[ChrisL]

DELTA4EMBASSY He was banned.

Yes!!! That was him! Hmm....I wonder.....

I don't think they are the same poster. Personalities are way different, although both very odd.

Yeah, as sick and demented as D4 was, I don't remember him always going to vulgarity when arguing.

D4 also tended to start a lot of weird creepy threads particularly about children, age of consent and some other disturbing things.

I remember DELTA4EMBASSY now, but only after you mention his threads about children and the age of consent. I cannot though remember his avatar, but Gracie and others say it was of a creepy man.

I think it was a picture of himself! Yeah, he was kind of a weird looking dude. More dorky looking than creepy, IMO. I believe that is just one reason why pedos go after kids. They are social retards and cannot relate with people their own age. They go for children who don't know they are social retards.

 

[ChrisL]

This guy (PP) seems to stick mostly with the gay agenda. I don't have a problem with gays or gay marriage. As long as both parties are adults and consent to the situation, meh, I don't really care. I draw my line at the insane transgender agenda.

PP says he is Heterosexual, he has been married for approx 30 years to a woman. This just makes things even more bizarro, I think he is Bisexual because he has this interest in males also.

I don't know if he is bisexual, but he is definitely an SJW for the gay agenda.

 

[eagle1462010]

So the pervert gets out using I'm a woman to pass parole by sentencing guidelines......

pfft........

The Fing Pervert molested kids for age 1 up according to the article..............HIS ASS SHOULD HAVE BEEN HUNG.

Oh..................gonna clear something up for confused libs............If something is hanging down there...........YOU ARE A MAN.........If there isn't anything hanging there.........well.........You are a woman.

There.......see how easy that it.

 

[Picaro]

Well, with SJW's trying to normalize these insane transgenders, what's next? Probably pedos. Scary.

There is no 'probably'; NAMBLA was a founding member organization of the ILGA, a gang of pedophiles supported by Harry Hay, founder of the ****** rights hoax himself. Faggots commit kiddie rapes far out of proportion to their percentage of the population than the scum who molest girls, from 35% to 50% of all molestations, while being only 2-3% of the population. Promoting pedophilia has always been on their agenda, still is.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

This guy (PP) seems to stick mostly with the gay agenda. I don't have a problem with gays or gay marriage. As long as both parties are adults and consent to the situation, meh, I don't really care. I draw my line at the insane transgender agenda.

PP says he is Heterosexual, he has been married for approx 30 years to a woman. This just makes things even more bizarro, I think he is Bisexual because he has this interest in males also.

I don't know if he is bisexual, but he is definitely an SJW for the gay agenda.

A SJW for the entire LGBTQ Agenda, I mean literally the amount of threads he has posted on this is incredible, he also has a bizarro obsession with posting threads defending the teaching aka Indoctrination of very young children the LGBTQ Agenda, he also appears to INSIST that 3 year olds already know they are not the Gender they were born with and so should be encouraged to experiment with the Alternative Gender. He has posted threads defending the child sexual abusing UNICEF and even though peoples have posted articles from Mainstream publications showing the amount of UNICEF workers including a former Director of UNICEF who have been arrested for raping children PP ignores this and continues to promote UNICEF and any organisation who are pushing the sexualisation of children.

Children should be allowed to be children, young children do NOT need to be told about sex especially the perverted types of sex and all the buttfucking anal sex thing.

According to PP and those like him IF you disagree with young children being brainwashed with the LGBTQ Agenda you are a "bigot", they are pushing this perverted LGBTQ Agenda under the guise of "Tolerance" what a lot of horsecrap, so if you disagree you are an "intolerant bigot"

ALL responsible adults then should be PROUD to be "intolerant bigots" and NOT be bullied into STFU, all responsible adults have a moral duty to protect ALL children not only their own children but others children also and as a parent I can think of nothing more important than protecting ALL children from sexual perverts who want to abuse and rape them and effectively DESTROY these young childrens lives, studies show that a majority of children who have been sexually abused end up with alcohol and drug problems and many with suicidal tendency and many also commit suicide, so if wanting to protect children from these MONSTERS makes me an "intolerant bigot" then I am proud to wear that label.

 

[ChrisL]

This guy (PP) seems to stick mostly with the gay agenda. I don't have a problem with gays or gay marriage. As long as both parties are adults and consent to the situation, meh, I don't really care. I draw my line at the insane transgender agenda.

PP says he is Heterosexual, he has been married for approx 30 years to a woman. This just makes things even more bizarro, I think he is Bisexual because he has this interest in males also.

I don't know if he is bisexual, but he is definitely an SJW for the gay agenda.

A SJW for the entire LGBTQ Agenda, I mean literally the amount of threads he has posted on this is incredible, he also has a bizarro obsession with posting threads defending the teaching aka Indoctrination of very young children the LGBTQ Agenda, he also appears to INSIST that 3 year olds already know they are not the Gender they were born with and so should be encouraged to experiment with the Alternative Gender. He has posted threads defending the child sexual abusing UNICEF and even though peoples have posted articles from Mainstream publications showing the amount of UNICEF workers including a former Director of UNICEF who have been arrested for raping children PP ignores this and continues to promote UNICEF and any organisation who are pushing the sexualisation of children.

Children should be allowed to be children, young children do NOT need to be told about sex especially the perverted types of sex and all the buttfucking anal sex thing.

According to PP and those like him IF you disagree with young children being brainwashed with the LGBTQ Agenda you are a "bigot", they are pushing this perverted Agenda under the guise of "Tolerance" what a lot of horsecrap, so if you disagree you are an "intolerant bigot"

ALL responsible adults then should be PROUD to be "intolerant bigots" and NOT be bullied into STFU, all responsible adults have a moral duty to protect ALL children not only their own children but others children also and as a parent I can think of nothing more important than protecting ALL children from sexual perverts who want to abuse and rape them and effectively DESTROY these young childrens lives, studies show that a majority of children who have been abused end up with alcohol and drug problems and many with suicidal tendency and many also commit suicide, so if wanted to protect children from these MONSTERS makes me an "intolerant bigot" then I am proud to wear that label.

Yeah, that is messed up. If you are gay fine, don't try to push this crap on kids though.

Meh, let him call us bigots. Who really cares?

 

[ChrisL]

Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me.

Call me this and call me that, call yourself a dirty rat.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

You people sure pick the strangest things too get all bent out of shape over. She will be subject to lifetime supervisions as are the vast majority of sex offenders. Only the most dangerous are subject to civil commitment after serving their prison term. So what is different about this case? Oh let me guess. The transgender part?

We already know PP that you consider us all "bigots" for wanting to protect children from LGBTQ sex perverts who want to groom children so they can sexually abuse and rape them, which is exactly what this waste of human skin did to 15 children the youngest being just 1 years in age, but you know it's being a "bigot" NOT wanting a baby of 1 years in age to be RAPED by a Transgender freak who's a MAN who dresses up as a WOMAN because he's mentally deranged in the head.

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

He is defending the indefensible.

Your hysteria is beyond stupid. Where the **** did I defend this creep? My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender. What part of that do you not understand?

This is your typical MO PP, that when someone is defending children from these child RAPISTS or when someone is saying that young children should NOT be subjected to all the LGBTQ Agenda crap you accuse that person of getting "hysterical"

"My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender."

You have missed the ENTIRE point of this OP article, you have missed that this creature has DELIBERATELY USED the Transgender excuse to somehow convince a group of idiots who are probably more concerned with NOT offending anyone to release this child RAPIST back into the public.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You people sure pick the strangest things too get all bent out of shape over. She will be subject to lifetime supervisions as are the vast majority of sex offenders. Only the most dangerous are subject to civil commitment after serving their prison term. So what is different about this case? Oh let me guess. The transgender part?

We already know PP that you consider us all "bigots" for wanting to protect children from LGBTQ sex perverts who want to groom children so they can sexually abuse and rape them, which is exactly what this waste of human skin did to 15 children the youngest being just 1 years in age, but you know it's being a "bigot" NOT wanting a baby of 1 years in age to be RAPED by a Transgender freak who's a MAN who dresses up as a WOMAN because he's mentally deranged in the head.

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

You're another ******* hysterical idiot. I'm not defending anyone. The crimes are despicable. She served her sentence and there is nothing in the article that indicated that she was released early because she is transgender.

There is a specific criteria for civil commitment following prison and apparently she does not meet that criteria. You dumb ***** are bouncing off the wall because of the transgender issue. If she were not trans, this thread would not even exist.
The point is that she should not be treated differently than anyone else. Your gripe should be with the states sentencing guidelines for sex offenders, not with me.

It appears he didn’t serve his full prison sentence, he was released from prison. They ARE treating him differently because he is pretending to be a woman. Otherwise he would had not been let free on the streets. They are claiming that lowered testosterone levels make it less likely he will rape children. He IS being allowed to walk free solely because of being “transgender”.

You are a liar and a sick demented asshole.

You're the one who is demented. It does not say that she was released from prison early. It says that the state opted not to pursue subsequent civil commitment because , because, as a woman she, did not pose a risk level that meets the criteria. There was no leniency based on being transgender.

I maintain the this outrage is all about her being trans. How many threads have there been about the majority of sex offenders who are men not being civilly committed after prison? None!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You people sure pick the strangest things too get all bent out of shape over. She will be subject to lifetime supervisions as are the vast majority of sex offenders. Only the most dangerous are subject to civil commitment after serving their prison term. So what is different about this case? Oh let me guess. The transgender part?

We already know PP that you consider us all "bigots" for wanting to protect children from LGBTQ sex perverts who want to groom children so they can sexually abuse and rape them, which is exactly what this waste of human skin did to 15 children the youngest being just 1 years in age, but you know it's being a "bigot" NOT wanting a baby of 1 years in age to be RAPED by a Transgender freak who's a MAN who dresses up as a WOMAN because he's mentally deranged in the head.

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

He is defending the indefensible.

Your hysteria is beyond stupid. Where the **** did I defend this creep? My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender. What part of that do you not understand?

This is your typical MO PP, that when someone is defending children from these child RAPISTS or when someone is saying that young children should NOT be subjected to all the LGBTQ Agenda crap you accuse that person of getting "hysterical"

"My whole point is that she should not be treated differently because she is transgender."

You have missed the ENTIRE point of this OP article, you have missed that this creature has DELIBERATELY USED the Transgender excuse to somehow convince a group of idiots who are probably more concerned with NOT offending anyone to release this child RAPIST back into the public.

It's you who misses the point. See post 74

 

[eagle1462010]

This guy (PP) seems to stick mostly with the gay agenda. I don't have a problem with gays or gay marriage. As long as both parties are adults and consent to the situation, meh, I don't really care. I draw my line at the insane transgender agenda.

PP says he is Heterosexual, he has been married for approx 30 years to a woman. This just makes things even more bizarro, I think he is Bisexual because he has this interest in males also.

I don't know if he is bisexual, but he is definitely an SJW for the gay agenda.

A SJW for the entire LGBTQ Agenda, I mean literally the amount of threads he has posted on this is incredible, he also has a bizarro obsession with posting threads defending the teaching aka Indoctrination of very young children the LGBTQ Agenda, he also appears to INSIST that 3 year olds already know they are not the Gender they were born with and so should be encouraged to experiment with the Alternative Gender. He has posted threads defending the child sexual abusing UNICEF and even though peoples have posted articles from Mainstream publications showing the amount of UNICEF workers including a former Director of UNICEF who have been arrested for raping children PP ignores this and continues to promote UNICEF and any organisation who are pushing the sexualisation of children.

Children should be allowed to be children, young children do NOT need to be told about sex especially the perverted types of sex and all the buttfucking anal sex thing.

According to PP and those like him IF you disagree with young children being brainwashed with the LGBTQ Agenda you are a "bigot", they are pushing this perverted LGBTQ Agenda under the guise of "Tolerance" what a lot of horsecrap, so if you disagree you are an "intolerant bigot"

ALL responsible adults then should be PROUD to be "intolerant bigots" and NOT be bullied into STFU, all responsible adults have a moral duty to protect ALL children not only their own children but others children also and as a parent I can think of nothing more important than protecting ALL children from sexual perverts who want to abuse and rape them and effectively DESTROY these young childrens lives, studies show that a majority of children who have been sexually abused end up with alcohol and drug problems and many with suicidal tendency and many also commit suicide, so if wanting to protect children from these MONSTERS makes me an "intolerant bigot" then I am proud to wear that label.

They are a bunch of damned Wankers............never had a problem saying that to them.......

poor things..............This is just another case of BS.......from a guy that raped little children...........it's Freaking Sick.,

 

[ChrisL]

You people sure pick the strangest things too get all bent out of shape over. She will be subject to lifetime supervisions as are the vast majority of sex offenders. Only the most dangerous are subject to civil commitment after serving their prison term. So what is different about this case? Oh let me guess. The transgender part?

We already know PP that you consider us all "bigots" for wanting to protect children from LGBTQ sex perverts who want to groom children so they can sexually abuse and rape them, which is exactly what this waste of human skin did to 15 children the youngest being just 1 years in age, but you know it's being a "bigot" NOT wanting a baby of 1 years in age to be RAPED by a Transgender freak who's a MAN who dresses up as a WOMAN because he's mentally deranged in the head.

This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.

You're another ******* hysterical idiot. I'm not defending anyone. The crimes are despicable. She served her sentence and there is nothing in the article that indicated that she was released early because she is transgender.

There is a specific criteria for civil commitment following prison and apparently she does not meet that criteria. You dumb ***** are bouncing off the wall because of the transgender issue. If she were not trans, this thread would not even exist.
The point is that she should not be treated differently than anyone else. Your gripe should be with the states sentencing guidelines for sex offenders, not with me.

It appears he didn’t serve his full prison sentence, he was released from prison. They ARE treating him differently because he is pretending to be a woman. Otherwise he would had not been let free on the streets. They are claiming that lowered testosterone levels make it less likely he will rape children. He IS being allowed to walk free solely because of being “transgender”.

You are a liar and a sick demented asshole.

You're the one who is demented. It does not say that she was released from prison early. It says that the state opted not to pursue subsequent civil commitment because , because, as a woman she, did not pose a risk level that meets the criteria. There was no leniency based on being transgender.

I maintain the this outrage is all about her being trans. How many threads have there been about the majority of sex offenders who are men not being civilly committed after prison? None!

He is not a woman. Women are more than breasts and dresses!