You people sure pick the strangest things too get all bent out of shape over. She will be subject to lifetime supervisions as are the vast majority of sex offenders. Only the most dangerous are subject to civil commitment after serving their prison term. So what is different about this case? Oh let me guess. The transgender part?
We already know PP that you consider us all "bigots" for wanting to protect children from LGBTQ sex perverts who want to groom children so they can sexually abuse and rape them, which is exactly what this waste of human skin did to 15 children the youngest being just 1 years in age, but you know it's being a "bigot" NOT wanting a baby of 1 years in age to be RAPED by a Transgender freak who's a MAN who dresses up as a WOMAN because he's mentally deranged in the head.
This is a new low, even for PP. He always walks the line claiming he is against pedos but supports “gay rights”. But here he is openly supporting a child molesting ****** being let free. What a sick piece of shit.
You're another ******* hysterical idiot. I'm not defending anyone. The crimes are despicable. She served her sentence and there is nothing in the article that indicated that she was released early because she is transgender.
There is a specific criteria for civil commitment following prison and apparently she does not meet that criteria. You dumb ***** are bouncing off the wall because of the transgender issue. If she were not trans, this thread would not even exist.
The point is that she should not be treated differently than anyone else. Your gripe should be with the states sentencing guidelines for sex offenders, not with me.