The lawfare conspiracy theory doesn't exist outside your cult, you must understand this. It also has nothing to do with my question. Just because you refuse to ignore reality doesn't mean reality no longer applies to everyone else. A lone man, who has the backing of the supreme court to run to his aide, unprompted is not weak nor powerless. A man who has other judges, like Cannon in his pocket to sit on his own case is not weak or powerless. Trump may be the single most powerful person in the United States. This is a fact. That doofus, Merrick Garland was so afraid of him that he postponed bringing charges against him for 2 years, which completely contradicts the "lawfare" conspiracy. Ultimately, you do favor two sets of laws.
The defense can dispute evidence during pre-trial motions and hearings once an indictment has been issued. These motions might include challenges to the admissibility of evidence, requests to suppress evidence obtained unlawfully, and other legal arguments to dispute the prosecution's case. When the best, the defense can come up with is that Smith isn't legally allowed to prosecute their client, it means they have zero defense against the actual evidence.
