Convicted Felon Trump Conveniently Nominates His Defense Attorney To DOJ

[krichton]

An indictment is nothing more than an accusation. People are accused every day, not all are guilty, as is the case here.

Just illustrates your mad hypocrisy.

Thanks for accepting the inevitable outcome. They are in the process of being ended by the prosecutors.

No, the accusation comes first and then you must provide enough evidence and witness testimony to move to an indictment. That is when a grand jury will decide if that evidence is enough to prove you're guilt. Fact 1: Trump stole top secret classified documents, including nuclear secrets. Fact 2: Trump refused to return documents even when asked to, and was served a subpeona on May 2022, then was paid a visit by the FBI on June 2022, where Trump and his lawyers gave them some classified documents and certified that they returned ALL classified documents. Fact #3, In August of 2022, the FBI raided Mar a Lago and retrieved over 300 classified documents. It was later revealed after that visit, Trump had employees move those classified boxes to another location before the raid.

In most cases, when someone prominent does #1, nothing will happen to them. Look at Pence and Biden as examples. Trump was still in the clear after #2 if he had simply handed over everything he had, but certifying that you returned all classified documents while still keeping the vast majority of it? That is a clear felony under the law. Trump would have been tried and convicted. The only question would have been his punishment.

If Clinton was still president I would want his 10 year close friendship with Epstein investigated fully. Oh wait, that was Trump, not Clinton. What you're saying about Bill is what you would call an accusation. Without evidence and testimony however, it's just nothing more than the rantings and ravings of a conspiracy theorist. With evidence is how you get an indictment, which is what happened to Trump 3 times this year.

I have no choice but to accept that there are two sets of laws in this country, one for the rich and powerful and one for the weak and powerless. My question to you is, why are you so eager to support corruption like this?

 

[krichton]

Are you denying that Trump banned Epstein from Mar A Lago many years ago and had nothing to do with him after doing so? The statement you're quoting was from 2002...twenty two years ago...long before Epstein was outed. Bill Clinton was still hanging out with Epstein.

They had a falling out. Who hasn't had a falling with a scumbag like Trump? That still doesn't change the fact that Trump was knowingly best friends with a sex trafficker and predator for 10 years, and likely participated in the same activities.

 

[SeaMajor7]

They had a falling out. Who hasn't had a falling with a scumbag like Trump? That still doesn't change the fact that Trump was knowingly best friends with a sex trafficker and predator for 10 years, and likely participated in the same activities.

Your ******* SOVIET LAWFARE has dramatically FAILED!!!!!!
It's OVER.
LANDSLIDE ELECTORAL VICTORY
LANDSLIDE POPULAR VOTE VICTORY
You LOST!!!!!
STFU
GTFOH
GFY

DISMISSED

 

[Concerned American]

No, the accusation comes first and then you must provide enough evidence and witness testimony to move to an indictment. That is when a grand jury will decide if that evidence is enough to prove you're guilt. Fact 1: Trump stole top secret classified documents, including nuclear secrets. Fact 2: Trump refused to return documents even when asked to, and was served a subpeona on May 2022, then was paid a visit by the FBI on June 2022, where Trump and his lawyers gave them some classified documents and certified that they returned ALL classified documents. Fact #3, In August of 2022, the FBI raided Mar a Lago and retrieved over 300 classified documents. It was later revealed after that visit, Trump had employees move those classified boxes to another location before the raid.

In most cases, when someone prominent does #1, nothing will happen to them. Look at Pence and Biden as examples. Trump was still in the clear after #2 if he had simply handed over everything he had, but certifying that you returned all classified documents while still keeping the vast majority of it? That is a clear felony under the law. Trump would have been tried and convicted. The only question would have been his punishment.

If Clinton was still president I would want his 10 year close friendship with Epstein investigated fully. Oh wait, that was Trump, not Clinton. What you're saying about Bill is what you would call an accusation. Without evidence and testimony however, it's just nothing more than the rantings and ravings of a conspiracy theorist. With evidence is how you get an indictment, which is what happened to Trump 3 times this year.

I have no choice but to accept that there are two sets of laws in this country, one for the rich and powerful and one for the weak and powerless. My question to you is, why are you so eager to support corruption like this?

indictment
noun
us
/ɪnˈdaɪt̬.mənt/ uk
/ɪnˈdaɪt.mənt/

[ C ] law specialized
a formal statement of accusing someone of something:
The charges on the indictment include murder and attempted murder.
The indictment alleges that she did no work for some of these payments.

indictment

1. a statement that criticizes someone or something very strongly for being bad…

dictionary.cambridge.org

 

[AntonToo]

indictment
noun
us
/ɪnˈdaɪt̬.mənt/ uk
/ɪnˈdaɪt.mənt/

[ C ] law specialized
a formal statement of accusing someone of something:
The charges on the indictment include murder and attempted murder.
The indictment alleges that she did no work for some of these payments.

indictment

1. a statement that criticizes someone or something very strongly for being bad…

dictionary.cambridge.org

Silly, general dictionary is not going to explain to you the process of how indictments are brought in United States.

Read his post again, so you understand how indictments work. It's not just a formal accusation, there is a process that includes consideration of law and evidence by jury that recomends indictment.

 

[Man With A Plan]

No, they are violations.
I just posted them.

They are being dismissed.
Because the prosecutors are candy asses.


That's what your dear leader did.

www.ijpr.org · npr-news · 2024/10/22Trump has made more than 100 threats to prosecute or punish ...​

Oct 22, 2024 · An NPR investigation has found that since 2022, Trump has repeatedly threatened to investigate, prosecute, jail or otherwise punish his political opponents, rivals and even private.

And continues to do.

Good for you.............
Opinions posing as "news"are the lifeblood of Trump and his cult.

And the orange retards cabinet.

www.vanityfair.com · trumps-cabinet-as-seen-on-tvTrump’s Cabinet, as Seen on TV - Vanity Fair​

1 day ago · Sean Duffy, Trump’s nominee for transportation secretary, is arguably the potential Cabinet member with the most reality TV bona fides other than the president-elect himself.

Do you know what the term "Selective Prosecution" means, Nuthin? It's a central tenet of our legal system and something that Democrats ignored in their zeal to "get" Trump!

 

[Man With A Plan]

Silly, general dictionary is not going to explain to you the process of how indictments are brought in United States.

Read his post again, so you understand how indictments work. It's not just a formal accusation, there is a process that includes consideration of law and evidence by jury that recomends indictment.

It's a Grand Jury...which is a jury that only hears from the Prosecution. The only evidence that those jurors hear is what is presented by the Prosecution...Defense lawyers don't get to offer a differing view or contest the evidence that was presented.

 

[krichton]

If the past eight years have shown us anything, Nuthin...it's that you don't have to do anything wrong to have Democrats use the Justice System against you!

Then it's a good thing that Trump committed actual crimes instead of doing nothing wrong.

 

[krichton]

indictment
noun
us
/ɪnˈdaɪt̬.mənt/ uk
/ɪnˈdaɪt.mənt/

[ C ] law specialized
a formal statement of accusing someone of something:
The charges on the indictment include murder and attempted murder.
The indictment alleges that she did no work for some of these payments.

indictment

1. a statement that criticizes someone or something very strongly for being bad…

dictionary.cambridge.org

If you're ever indicted one day, you can explain this before the judge and reference the dictionary meaning of "indictment"

Now, answer my question, do you support two separate laws in this country, those for the rich and powerful and those for the powerless?

 

[Concerned American]

Now, answer my question, do you support two separate laws in this country, those for the rich and powerful and those for the powerless?

Of course not. That is why I am so adamantly opposed to the lawfare that the democrats have been using for the past eight years. There has been NO EVIDENCE of anything that has not be manufactured to meet the left's agenda. BTW, as I stated before, an indictment is an accusation. The prosecutor is making an accusation that he brings to the grand jury. The defense has no opportunity to dispute any of the prosecutions allegations. It is not evidence. Merely an allegation of wrong doing. Sorry it doesn't fit with your wishes, but that is the way it is.

 

[AntonToo]

It's a Grand Jury...which is a jury that only hears from the Prosecution. The only evidence that those jurors hear is what is presented by the Prosecution...Defense lawyers don't get to offer a differing view or contest the evidence that was presented.

aaaaand?

What did you dispute from what you've quoted? Nothing.

 

[jc456]

I'm fine. See, I KNOW what Trump is & I know he's a bullshit artist, a conman & a criminal. You? You're blind.

You'll learn it the hard way as do most cultists.

One plus of him winning is the Country didn't have to live thru another one of his fascist coup plots.

The question is for you, who should trump pick?

 

[jc456]

If you're ever indicted one day, you can explain this before the judge and reference the dictionary meaning of "indictment"

Now, answer my question, do you support two separate laws in this country, those for the rich and powerful and those for the powerless?

Who has such laws?

 

[Man With A Plan]

aaaaand?

What did you dispute from what you've quoted? Nothing.

Claiming an indictment means "guilt" when the District Attorney is totally biased against the defendant is laughable. DA's are given immense power in our Justice System. When they aren't impartial and use that power for political reasons you're left with people like Tish James and Alvin Bragg who abuse the Grand Jury system to get indictments against their political opposition.

 

[jc456]

If you're ever indicted one day, you can explain this before the judge and reference the dictionary meaning of "indictment"

Now, answer my question, do you support two separate laws in this country, those for the rich and powerful and those for the powerless?

Indictment is when the judge sentences you! The trial is not done

 

[AntonToo]

Claiming an indictment means "guilt"

Never claimed that.

How about you stop wasting everyone's time with bs and start reading posts before replying to them?

 

[Concerned American]

krichton If what was presented to the grand jury was considered evidence, why, pray tell, can the evidence that is presented to that august body be disallowed when the case eventually comes to trial? Hmmmm?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Do you know what the term "Selective Prosecution" means, Nuthin?

Yes.
They select criminals for prosecution.

It's a central tenet of our legal system and something that Democrats ignored in their zeal to "get" Trump!

WTF?

www.nbcnews.com · politics · donald-trumpTrump says he would 'absolutely' testify in his New York ...​

Apr 12, 2024 · PALM BEACH, Fla. — Former President Donald Trump told reporters Friday he would "absolutely" testify in his upcoming hush money trial that is set to begin on Monday. "Yeah...........



What happened?

 

[Man With A Plan]

Never claimed that.

How about you stop wasting everyone's time with bs and start reading posts before replying to them?

How about you stop stop wasting everyone's time claiming Trump is guilty of something because a few activist DA's and judges perverted the justice system in an attempt to harm his campaign?

 

[AntonToo]

How about you stop stop wasting everyone's time claiming Trump is guilty of something because a few activist DA's and judges perverted the justice system in an attempt to harm his campaign?

Trump was convicted by a jury of peers his lawyers vetted, based on undeniable evidence of falsification of bussiness records.

I know cultists like you will never accept that your Dear Leader is at fault, but for people who still have a head on their shoulders and are familiar with the case he clearly violated law, lied his ass off and well deserved the conviction