Blanche says DOJ won’t release full Epstein files to Congress by Friday deadline

[berg80]

Commee Brennan is in the QUE (on the docket) already, correct?

Really, that again? I already posted an explanation for his 1976 vote. The mark of a troll is when someone knows the truth but ignores it.


AI Overview

Former CIA Director John Brennan explained that he voted for the Communist Party USA candidate, Gus Hall, in the 1976 presidential election as a way of "signaling my unhappiness with the system"
.
Brennan, who was attending Fordham University at the time, detailed his reasoning and the context of this vote in several public forums:

• Protest Vote: He described the vote as a youthful, one-off protest against the political landscape of the Watergate era and a perceived "need for change".
• Context of 1976: He noted his dissatisfaction with the available political options, which led him to support a third-party candidate.
• Disclosure to CIA: Brennan revealed this vote during a lie-detector test when applying to the CIA in 1980, out of fear that lying would cause the machine to indicate deception.
• Freedom of Expression: Brennan has frequently cited this experience to highlight that the CIA and the U.S. government value freedom of speech and expression, noting that his past vote did not disqualify him from a career in national security.

 

[Delldude]

It was dropped because of the threats that followed.

Lawsuits accusing Donald Trump of sexually assaulting a child in the 1990s appear to have been orchestrated by an eccentric anti-Trump campaigner with a record of making outlandish claims about celebrities.

Norm Lubow, a former producer on the Jerry Springer TV show, has previously been involved with disputed allegations that OJ Simpson bought illegal drugs on the day Simpson’s wife was murdered, and that Kurt Cobain’s widow had the Nirvana frontman killed.
_______________
A publicist using the pseudonym “Al Taylor” is acting as a representative for Johnson, and has been shopping around to media outlets a video of a woman who wears a disguise while recounting the allegations against Trump. “Taylor” said in telephone calls last month that he was seeking $1m for the tape. Jezebel has published a segment of the video along with a detailed account of how the allegations against Trump were being pushed to reporters.

A telephone number and an email address used by “Taylor” have also been used by Lubow, according to three sources who have worked with them. A longtime associate of Lubow also told the Guardian that Lubow used the identity “Al Taylor”.

“Taylor” told the Guardian that he helped the alleged victim Johnson put together her first lawsuit against Trump, which was filed in California earlier this year. “She is a friend of mine,” he said, declining to make her available for interview.

He then became threatening when asked more about his motivations in seeking the money for the video and about his true identity. “Just be warned: we’ll sue you if we don’t like what you write,” he said. “We’ll sue your ass, own your ass and own your newspaper’s ass as well, punk.”
_____________
The legal action in Manhattan follows a near-identical suit in California that made the same allegations against Trump and Epstein. That case was promptly thrown out after a federal judge ruled that the complaint cited statutes that did not apply to it. Epstein has through representatives also denied the allegations.
____________
After repeated questions to “Al Taylor” asking him to confirm he was Norm Lubow went ignored, a text message was eventually sent to the Guardian from a cellphone previously answered several times by “Taylor”.

It said: “This is Katie Johnson. Why do you keep asking for [Lubow]. I do not know and have never met anybody by this name. If you are really a reporter like you claim are and not just a crank call like thousands of other calls I have gotten since my phone number was published throughout the world, then why don’t you ask how it feels to have the pervert who raped me when I was only 13 years running for President of this great country?

“It sickens me every time I see his evil face on TV. I am not after money, I want revenge for what this evil pedophile did to me. He doesn’t deserve to be President, he deserves to be in jail...If you really are a reporter like you told my attorney Tom Meagher, then please publish my statement for the millions of other Rape Victims who have no voice. Thank you, Katie Johnson.”

Normie:

 

[Delldude]

Really, that again? I already posted an explanation for his 1976 vote. The mark of a troll is when someone knows the truth but ignores it.


AI Overview

Former CIA Director John Brennan explained that he voted for the Communist Party USA candidate, Gus Hall, in the 1976 presidential election as a way of "signaling my unhappiness with the system"
.
Brennan, who was attending Fordham University at the time, detailed his reasoning and the context of this vote in several public forums:

• Protest Vote: He described the vote as a youthful, one-off protest against the political landscape of the Watergate era and a perceived "need for change".
• Context of 1976: He noted his dissatisfaction with the available political options, which led him to support a third-party candidate.
• Disclosure to CIA: Brennan revealed this vote during a lie-detector test when applying to the CIA in 1980, out of fear that lying would cause the machine to indicate deception.
• Freedom of Expression: Brennan has frequently cited this experience to highlight that the CIA and the U.S. government value freedom of speech and expression, noting that his past vote did not disqualify him from a career in national security.

Still committed Seditious Conspiracy.

 

[leftwinger]

Really, that again? I already posted an explanation for his 1976 vote. The mark of a troll is when someone knows the truth but ignores it.


AI Overview

Former CIA Director John Brennan explained that he voted for the Communist Party USA candidate, Gus Hall, in the 1976 presidential election as a way of "signaling my unhappiness with the system"
.
Brennan, who was attending Fordham University at the time, detailed his reasoning and the context of this vote in several public forums:

• Protest Vote: He described the vote as a youthful, one-off protest against the political landscape of the Watergate era and a perceived "need for change".
• Context of 1976: He noted his dissatisfaction with the available political options, which led him to support a third-party candidate.
• Disclosure to CIA: Brennan revealed this vote during a lie-detector test when applying to the CIA in 1980, out of fear that lying would cause the machine to indicate deception.
• Freedom of Expression: Brennan has frequently cited this experience to highlight that the CIA and the U.S. government value freedom of speech and expression, noting that his past vote did not disqualify him from a career in national security.

Got it. He voted Communist. THX for verifying

 

[Rawley]

With Trump, it's one lie after another.

View attachment 1198169

Perhaps you might look at the context of his tweet so you don't come off as a lying partisan stooge.

 

[Rawley]

It was dropped because of the threats that followed.

DId your masters tell you who threatened her? ANd what they threatened her with?

 

[YoursTruly]

Perhaps you might look at the context of his tweet so you don't come off as a lying partisan stooge.

I'm more partial to victims than pedophiles.

 

[leftwinger]

I'm more partial to victims than pedophiles.

Obvious trolling. There are no pedophiles in this mess. No victims were that young as explained on these threads ad nauseum. Yet you try again?

 

[Rawley]

I'm more partial to victims than pedophiles.

1) You have no idea what a pedophile is.
2) You have no evidence, none, zero evidence that President Trump was sexually involved with any of Epstein's "victims"

In fact every single one of the "victims" has expressly cleared the President from any wrongdoing.

But here you are posting lie after lie after lie about the President. Which tells us you are a partisan Trump hating TDS sufferer and you couldn't give a flying **** about any of Epstein's victims.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

FBI doesn't publicly publish them..........

Line up your excuses, cultism dictates it.

 

[Delldude]

Line up your excuses, cultism dictates it.

So does FBI policy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So does FBI policy.

Nobody knows what you are saying, least of all you.

Let's review:

The incompetents under Trump didn't follow the reaction guidelines, and now people are accessing redacted information.

They didnt follow them, because they dont know them. Because they are incompetent.

 

[Delldude]

The incompetents under Trump didn't follow the reaction guidelines, and now people are accessing redacted information.

I'm thinking you're having a 'reaction' to too much alcohol.

Please step away from the bottle and try to stay on topic.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'm thinking you're having a 'reaction' to too much alcohol.

Please step away from the bottle.

There you go, stay in your lane. Typos are more your speed. When you try to talk about complicated topics... well, let's just say it's not a display of sober intelligence.

 

[beagle9]

You have no clue. It may have been 1000X worse if the President did not get them to tone it down?

As many have pointed out repeatedly, there is a time he has to play within the system. Or what is your alternative? Shutdown? Then nothing gets fixed solidly going forward? We Run out of time? That is what deep state is doing, trying to stall these years.

Here's hoping each fight we win bigger. It's a big ship. Support the only guy working to save your Children's future, within the existing system.

They're willing to throw it all away for a quick thrill.

 

[beagle9]

View attachment 1198173

Who at 13 years old tells an Epstein recruiter (Maxwell maybe ?), that she came to NYC in search of a modeling career ??????

Ok, so where were her parent's ?
If anything she may have been a street wise run away that possibly crossed paths with Maxwell who took notice of her in regards to her being a run away or something of that type.

So Maxwell seeing the vulnerability offers to bring her into the Epstein web ???

Besides all that, the girl being 13 had no business being recruited at that age into becoming a masseuse or anything on any island with a bunch of perverts.

The vulnerability is understandable if she was a runaway, and in no way is she responsible for anything that happened to her.

 

[beagle9]

Obvious trolling. There are no pedophiles in this mess. No victims were that young as explained on these threads ad nauseum. Yet you try again?

They love using the most hurtful labeling, otherwise even if it doesn't apply. We have seen the patterns, and they stick to their BS no matter what.

 

[YoursTruly]

Who at 13 years old tells an Epstein recruiter (Maxwell maybe ?), that she came to NYC in search of a modeling career ??????

Ok, so where were her parent's ?
If anything she may have been a street wise run away that possibly crossed paths with Maxwell who took notice of her in regards to her being a run away or something of that type.

So Maxwell seeing the vulnerability offers to bring her into the Epstein web ???

Besides all that, the girl being 13 had no business being recruited at that age into becoming a masseuse or anything on any island with a bunch of perverts.

The vulnerability is understandable if she was a runaway, and in no way is she responsible for anything that happened to her.

She was 13 years old. FFS, it doesn't matter where her parents were. Or even if she was a run away. She was 13.

Geezus, the lame excuses you TL's come up with, just to defend pedophiles.

 

[Godboy]

And they're stalling again.

Lets assume that you were in a position of power and you know for a fact that they are trying to cover up the files, and you have seen those files personally. You are told that Trump has demanded that you and all your upper level coworkers in the government protect him and a bunch of other top officials and dignitaries by suppressing all the damning information that will send them to prison.

Would you say, "oh ok, i will illegally cover it all up for you guys"? No, of course you wouldnt. No one would do that. None of the people in powerful positions that you have to convince are even a part of this pedo ring, so why in the holy **** would they help out pedos, and thereby become criminals themselves? They ******* wouldnt. No one would. Not Kash, not Bongino, not Bondi, none of their underlings, no one.

There is no conspiracy here. Stop being a fucktard. Its people like you that make me stop even caring about those girls. FINE! Out them all!!! Dont redact any information to protect them... just so dipshits like YOU will shut the **** up.

 

[beagle9]

She was 13 years old. FFS, it doesn't matter where her parents were. Or even if she was a run away. She was 13.

Geezus, the lame excuses you TL's come up with, just to defend pedophiles.

If you read that post as someone making excuses, then you just showed how dammned disingenuous you truly are. If you can't debate on the issue's honestly then go somewhere else and spew your BS.