Convicted Felon Michael Flynn Registers As Foreign Agent With Putin Allies

[struth]

Sullivan won the appeal in September

No he didn't.,...he didn't get anything he wanted.

 

[struth]

Flynn also said he never talked to Kislyak

Not just that he didn't recall the topic of discussion.

hahah no he didn't.....omg he specifcally said he did speak to him, they asked him specifc questions about what they discussed and he said he couldn't recall everything word for word.

They believed him.

 

[Bad Bob]

he is an idiot that doesn't actually read much of the posts and just spouts nonsense because he is so stupid.

Oh, Lance. Have I pissed you off by pointing out that posts like the above dishonor the United States Marine Corps?

You are stealing the valor of the Marine Corps by dishonoring our core values of Honor, Courage and Commitment.

This is why I doubt your claims of being a retired Gunnery Sergeant in the United States Marine Corps. You don't walk the walk, son.

 

[struth]

And maga claimed that flynn had no connections with russia.

russia russia russia

when did anyone claim he had NO connections to Russia?

 

[struth]

Oh, Lance. Have I pissed you off by pointing out that posts like the above dishonor the United States Marine Corps?

You are stealing the valor of the Marine Corps by dishonoring our core values of Honor, Courage and Commitment.

This is why I doubt your claims of being a retired Gunnery Sergeant in the United States Marine Corps. You don't walk the walk, son.

View attachment 1266849

How is pointing out someone is an idiot dishonor the USMC?

 

[postman]

The Full Circuit did not, what they did do however is say that the Judge had to consider the motion, what part of the DC circuit said, was that the case was dismissed out right, instead the full court sent it back, and said the lower court had to first "consider" the motion and then dismiss it. which of course he finally got around to doing

Consider the motion and then dismiss it?

You are playing STUPID again. The final ruling of the Appeals court did not order Sullivan to dismiss.
It threw out the previous writ of Mandamus, and said Sullivan could continue with the case, where he continued to "consider" the motion to dismiss.

The case was dismissed because of Trumps pardon.

 

[postman]

The criminal case against Michael Flynn was formally dismissed by U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan on December 8, 2020. This dismissal followed a presidential pardon issued by Donald Trump in late November 2020, [Nov 25th] which wiped away Flynn's previous guilty plea for lying to the FBI

 

[postman]

No he didn't.,...he didn't get anything he wanted.

The court threw out the writ of Mandamus.

That's what Sullivan wanted.

 

[postman]

hahah no he didn't.....omg he specifcally said he did speak to him, they asked him specifc questions about what they discussed and he said he couldn't recall everything word for word.

They believed him.

Flynn admitted speaking to him, AFTER he initially denied speaking to him.

 

[struth]

Consider the motion and then dismiss it?

You are playing STUPID again. The final ruling of the Appeals court did not order Sullivan to dismiss.
It threw out the previous writ of Mandamus, and said Sullivan could continue with the case, where he continued to "consider" the motion to dismiss.

The case was dismissed because of Trumps pardon.

Yes,. it was merely procedural

and of course he did dismiss it.

The court threw out the writ of Mandamus.

That's what Sullivan wanted.

No they didn't, in fact they ordered him take up the motion to dismiss

 

[struth]

Flynn admitted speaking to him, AFTER he initially denied speaking to him.

No he didn't. Stop lying. I provided a link, showing the interview.

 

[postman]

Yes,. it was merely procedural

and of course he did dismiss it.

Dismissed BECAUSE of Trump's pardon issued two weeks earlier.

 

[struth]

Dismissed BECAUSE of Trump's pardon issued two weeks earlier.

Dismissed because he was ordered by the DC Circuit to take up the motion. There was nothing else he could of done.

It was dismissed because the DOJ finally got to review the evidence the Mueller team was hiding, and it was clearly not a crime.


So, why did it take this long for Sullivan to dismiss a prosecution that the parties agree never should have been brought in the first place?

Well, he took the extremely unusual step of appointing a retired federal judge, John Gleeson, as a “friend of court”—just a few days after Gleeson wrote a harsh polemic against Flynn in The Washington Post. Sullivan tasked him with investigating whether he should agree to the dismissal and whether Flynn should potentially be charged with perjury (?!) in connection with initially having entered a guilty plea.

The implications of Sullivan’s moves were staggering.

Moreover, it’s been 3-1/2 months since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, sitting en banc, gave Sullivan a face-saving “out” to continue handling the case, overruling a panel decision that had ordered him to immediately dismiss the case.

The en banc court gently prodded him to resolve the issues quickly, saying, “we trust and expect the District Court to proceed with appropriate dispatch.”

Unfortunately, he did nothing of the sort, demonstrating that the “trust” of the appellate court was misplaced. Given Sullivan’s questionable conduct throughout the case, it should have known better.

 

[postman]

No they didn't, in fact they ordered him take up the motion to dismiss

They ordered Sullivan to read the motion. They specifically said they were not ordering him to do what it said.

 

[struth]

They ordered Sullivan to read the motion. They specifically said they were no ordering him to do what it said.

The en banc court gently prodded him to resolve the issues quickly, saying, “we trust and expect the District Court to proceed with appropriate dispatch.”

 

[postman]

The implications of Sullivan’s moves were staggering.

Moreover, it’s been 3-1/2 months since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, sitting en banc, gave Sullivan a face-saving “out” to continue handling the case, overruling a panel decision that had ordered him to immediately dismiss the case. [/I]

The en banc court gently prodded him to resolve the issues quickly, saying, “we trust and expect the District Court to proceed with appropriate dispatch.”

Unfortunately, he did nothing of the sort, demonstrating that the “trust” of the appellate court was misplaced. Given Sullivan’s questionable conduct throughout the case, it should have known better.

Your own citation show you've been lying your ass off.

They did not order Sullivan to dismiss the case. As your own citation says, "prodded him to resolve the issues quickly"

 

[postman]

The en banc court gently prodded him to resolve the issues quickly, saying, “we trust and expect the District Court to proceed with appropriate dispatch.”

Gently prodded

You're being deliberately stupid.
They already threw out the "order" to follow the motion.

 

[Alweysrite!]

Maybe you miss how lenient they were on Flynn, which is why he plead guilty to a SINGLE COUNT.
They could have done much more, such as they didn't charge him with being an unregistered foreign agent. Note Flynn is now following the law and registering as a foreign agent. They could have charged him with violation of the Logan act. And security clearance violations, when he didn't report speaking with a foreign government or it's agents.
There was a huge laundry list of crimes Flynn committed, and they were letting him off easy with just one count.

It was all political, just so they can say someone involved with Trump had trouble with the law. It was called entrapment I believe.

 

[struth]

Your own citation show you've been lying your ass off.

They did not order Sullivan to dismiss the case. As your own citation says, "prodded him to resolve the issues quickly"

I said they ordered him to take ujp the motion, which was to dismiss the case. They ordered him to do it quickly, he refused, and let it drag out for months....but did in fact dismiss it finally

 

[struth]

Gently prodded

You're being deliberately stupid.
They already threw out the "order" to follow the motion.

hahah they said procedurally the Cicuit can't dismiss the case, they had to send it back for the lower court to do it, and they said get it done.

You have literally been wrong about everything in regards to this case.