Convicted Felon Michael Flynn Registers As Foreign Agent With Putin Allies

Flynn would have been convicted at trial. The evidence was overwhelming. And his argument that his lie wasn't germane to the case against him, applied to perjury, not a USC 18, 1001 charge.
No he wouldn't of been, the evidence, once the DOJ got the Mueller team to release the brady evidence, clearly showed there was no crime.

To be convicted, a jury would have to ignore the rule of law.

You have literally been wrong about everything about this case
 
Trump knew that Barrs request to drop the charges was being appealed, and when the new AG got there in January, Barr's motion would be superceeded.

Flynns only chance was a pardon. Which is what ended the case as "moot".

On November 25, 2020, President Donald Trump granted a full pardon to his former National Security Adviser, Michael Flynn, effectively ending the long-running criminal case against him. The pardon concluded a case in which Flynn had twice pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI regarding conversations with the Russian ambassador before attempting to withdraw his plea.

Sell stupid someplace else.
The Judge dismissed the case, it wasn't on appeal https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-...overdue-dismissal-flynn-case-reveals-his-bias

Federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan last week finally got around to doing what he should have done months ago.

Sullivan officially dismissed the Justice Department’s case against Michael Flynn, but only after President Donald Trump had pardoned him the day before Thanksgiving.

It never should have taken this long for Sullivan to dismiss the case, and frankly, it never should have come to this.

In fact, Sullivan’s obstreperous behavior in this case has been unpardonable.
 
it wasn't being appealed.

Play STUPID someplace else

For the record

Initial Mandamus (June 2020): A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit (Judges Neomi Rao and Karen LeCraft Henderson, with Judge Robert Wilkins dissenting) granted Flynn's petition for a writ of mandamus, ordering Judge Sullivan to grant the government's motion to dismiss the case. This unusual step aimed to prevent Sullivan from conducting a hearing on the Department of Justice's (DOJ) request to drop charges.

En Banc Rehearing (July/August 2020): Judge Sullivan requested a rehearing of the decision by the full D.C. Circuit, which was granted on July 30, 2020, vacating the initial panel ruling.

Final Decision (August/September 2020): The full (en banc) D.C. Circuit court ultimately ruled that Judge Sullivan could not be forced to immediately dismiss the case. The court held that the district judge was allowed to first consider the motion to dismiss and rejected the mandamus petition that sought to strip him of that authority, allowing the case to proceed initially.


Boom goes the dynamite, you inveterate liar.
 
No he wouldn't of been, the evidence, once the DOJ got the Mueller team to release the brady evidence, clearly showed there was no crime.
Flynn said he did not discuss sanctions with Kysliak.

They had the NSA intercept with Flynn discussing sanctions with Kysliak.

Game, Set, Match - CONVICTION
 

Initial Mandamus (June 2020): A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit (Judges Neomi Rao and Karen LeCraft Henderson, with Judge Robert Wilkins dissenting) granted Flynn's petition for a writ of mandamus, ordering Judge Sullivan to grant the government's motion to dismiss the case. This unusual step aimed to prevent Sullivan from conducting a hearing on the Department of Justice's (DOJ) request to drop charges.

En Banc Rehearing (July/August 2020): Judge Sullivan requested a rehearing of the decision by the full D.C. Circuit, which was granted on July 30, 2020, vacating the initial panel ruling.

Final Decision (August/September 2020): The full (en banc) D.C. Circuit court ultimately ruled that Judge Sullivan could not be forced to immediately dismiss the case. The court held that the district judge was allowed to first consider the motion to dismiss and rejected the mandamus petition that sought to strip him of that authority, allowing the case to proceed initially.
[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
Play STUPID someplace else

For the record

Initial Mandamus (June 2020): A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit (Judges Neomi Rao and Karen LeCraft Henderson, with Judge Robert Wilkins dissenting) granted Flynn's petition for a writ of mandamus, ordering Judge Sullivan to grant the government's motion to dismiss the case. This unusual step aimed to prevent Sullivan from conducting a hearing on the Department of Justice's (DOJ) request to drop charges.

En Banc Rehearing (July/August 2020): Judge Sullivan requested a rehearing of the decision by the full D.C. Circuit, which was granted on July 30, 2020, vacating the initial panel ruling.

Final Decision (August/September 2020): The full (en banc) D.C. Circuit court ultimately ruled that Judge Sullivan could not be forced to immediately dismiss the case. The court held that the district judge was allowed to first consider the motion to dismiss and rejected the mandamus petition that sought to strip him of that authority, allowing the case to proceed initially.


Boom goes the dynamite, you inveterate liar.
Boom goes what? You said that was appealed. It wasn't appealed in September you idiot.

In fact, the Judge dismissed the case.
 
Boom goes what? You said that was appealed. It wasn't appealed in September you idiot.

In fact, the Judge dismissed the case.
why argue with retards that can't get basic facts right? Well, I guess one reason is to show them and anyone reading the board they are wrong.
 

Read your own citation

Moreover, it’s been 3-1/2 months since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, sitting en banc, gave Sullivan a face-saving “out” to continue handling the case, overruling a panel decision that had ordered him to immediately dismiss the case.

You said it wasn't on appeal.

It was appealed to the en banc of the circuit court, which they granted for Sullivan, and threw out the writ of mandamus you keep posting., claiming that ended the case.
 
Boom goes what? You said that was appealed. It wasn't appealed in September you idiot.

In fact, the Judge dismissed the case.
It was appealed in July/August
The ruling came down August/September
Throwing out the original writ of Mandamus, and saying Sullivan could continue with the case.

Trump's pardon in November is what ended it.
 
why argue with retards that can't get basic facts right? Well, I guess one reason is to show them and anyone reading the board they are wrong.
Then you read the record, and tell me how the case ended. He claimed there was no appeal (to the en banc of the circuit court)

Initial Mandamus (June 2020): A three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit (Judges Neomi Rao and Karen LeCraft Henderson, with Judge Robert Wilkins dissenting) granted Flynn's petition for a writ of mandamus, ordering Judge Sullivan to grant the government's motion to dismiss the case. This unusual step aimed to prevent Sullivan from conducting a hearing on the Department of Justice's (DOJ) request to drop charges.

En Banc Rehearing (July/August 2020): Judge Sullivan requested a rehearing of the decision by the full D.C. Circuit, which was granted on July 30, 2020, vacating the initial panel ruling.

Final Decision (August/September 2020): The full (en banc) D.C. Circuit court ultimately ruled that Judge Sullivan could not be forced to immediately dismiss the case. The court held that the district judge was allowed to first consider the motion to dismiss and rejected the mandamus petition that sought to strip him of that authority, allowing the case to proceed initially.
 
Flynn said he did not discuss sanctions with Kysliak.

They had the NSA intercept with Flynn discussing sanctions with Kysliak.

Game, Set, Match - CONVICTION
Mr.Flynn was “unguarded” in the interview and “clearly” viewed the agents as “allies.”2 Priestap’s notes dated January 24 state, “What’s our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him tolie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” On the same paper, Priestap wrote, “If we’reseen as playing games, WH will be furious. Protect our institution by not playing games.” Ex.10, FBI Handwritten Note, Jan. 23/24, 2017. Another note stated, “We regularly show subjectsevidence, with the goal of getting them to admit their wrongdoing. I don’t see how gettingsomeone to admit their wrongdoing is going easy on him.” See id.8transcripts” of his calls. Ex. 5 at 7; see also Ex. 3 at 6; Ex. 4 at 5; Ex.6. Nor did the agents give,at any point, warnings that making false statements would be a crime. Ex. 3 at 6; Ex. 4 at 5; Ex.9 at 5-6; see also Ex.6. According to the FBIagents’ recollections,when asked if Mr.Flynnrecalled any conversation in which he encouraged Kislyak not to “escalate the situation” in itsresponse to American sanctions, Mr.Flynn responded uncertainly,stating,“Not really. I don’tremember. It wasn’t, ‘Don’t do anything.’” Ex. 6 at 5. Mr.Flynn also stated that although itwas possible, he did not recall any conversation in which the ambassador stated that Russiawould moderate its response due to Mr.Flynn’s request. Id. He stated that he did not have along conversation with Mr.Kislyak to “don’t do something.” Id.UnitedNations vote on Israeli settlements,Mr.Flynn explained that the conversations were“along the linesof where do you stand and what’s your position” and that “he did not believe hiscalls to the various countrieswould change anything.” Id.at 4. He also stated that his calls didnot involve any requests for how to vote, and answered “no” when asked if he discusseddelaying or defeating the vote. See id. at 4. The FD-302,moreover,indicates that Mr.Flynndenied that Kislyak described any Russian request to his response. Id.; see Ex.12,FBIHandwrittenNotes of MichaelFlynn Interview(January 24, 2017).lied. See Ex. 4 at 5. FBIagents reported to their leadership that Mr.Flynn exhibited a “very suredemeanor” and “did not give any indicatorsof deception.” Ex.13 at 3. Both of the agents “hadthe impression at the time that Flynn was not lying or did not think he was lying.” Id. WhenCase 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 198 Filed05/07/20 Page 9 of 20Meanwhile,when asked if he recalled asking

Actually he said he didn't recall, and said it was possible. This was only done to undermine the new admin, by a rogue and corrupt FBI director and agents.
 
It was appealed in July/August
The ruling came down August/September
Throwing out the original writ of Mandamus, and saying Sullivan could continue with the case.

Trump's pardon in November is what ended it.
It didn't throw out anything, all they said was he had to consider the motion to dismiss. You implied that order was appealed., it wasn't.

The judge dismissed the case.
 
Read your own citation

Moreover, it’s been 3-1/2 months since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, sitting en banc, gave Sullivan a face-saving “out” to continue handling the case, overruling a panel decision that had ordered him to immediately dismiss the case.

You said it wasn't on appeal.

It was appealed to the en banc of the circuit court, which they granted for Sullivan, and threw out the writ of mandamus you keep posting., claiming that ended the case.
I said that wasn't appealed. You claimed the case was still on appeal, it wasn't.

The Circuit Court remained the case, said he had to consider the motion, denied the Judge extraordinary ruling about getting some special lawyer to look in to the motion
 
See Ex. 4 at 5. FBIagents reported to their leadership that Mr.Flynn exhibited a “very suredemeanor” and “did not give any indicatorsof deception.” Ex.13 at 3. Both of the agents “hadthe impression at the time that Flynn was not lying or did not think he was lying.” Id. WhenCase 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 198 Filed05/07/20 Page 9 of 20Meanwhile,when asked if he recalled asking
[/I]
Actually he said he didn't recall, and said it was possible.
The agents thought Flynn was telling the truth because of his demeanor. The agents were not privy at the time to the highly classified NSA intercepts of Flynn's conversation with Kislyak.
When they later got the highly classified NSA transcript, it was clear that Flynn flagrantly lied to the agents.
 
It didn't throw out anything, all they said was he had to consider the motion to dismiss. You implied that order was appealed., it wasn't.

The judge dismissed the case.
Playing STUPID again. The DC Circuit threw out the writ of mandamus ordering Sullivan to dismiss.
And instead said Sullivan had to "consider" the motion to dismiss. Which he was in the middle of, when Trump issued the pardon in November.

After the PARDON, Sullivan dismissed the case under Article 2 of the US Constitution.
 
The agents thought Flynn was telling the truth because of his demeanor. The agents were not privy at the time to the highly classified NSA intercepts of Flynn's conversation with Kislyak.
When they later got the highly classified NSA transcript, it was clear that Flynn flagrantly lied to the agents.
they thought was telling the truth, because, well...he was.

Saying he can't remember, wasn't a lie.

hhahah yes they were, they had the transcript! You continue to show your complete ignorance of reality.
 
15th post
The New Republic's Edith Olmsted reports, "Far-right blogger Scott McMahan posted a Foreign Agents Registration Act form Monday that was dated October 2025, and stated that Donald Trump's former national security adviser was now making $100,000 per month from the Republic of Srpska. The confederated entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina is run by Milorad Dodik, a key ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin."


Imagine that.
And maga claimed that flynn had no connections with russia.

russia russia russia
 
they thought was telling the truth, because, well...he was.

Saying he can't remember, wasn't a lie.
Flynn also said he never talked to Kislyak

Not just that he didn't recall the topic of discussion.
 
Playing STUPID again. The DC Circuit threw out the writ of mandamus ordering Sullivan to dismiss.
And instead said Sullivan had to "consider" the motion to dismiss. Which he was in the middle of, when Trump issued the pardon in November.

After the PARDON, Sullivan dismissed the case under Article 2 of the US Constitution.
The Full Circuit did not, what they did do however is say that the Judge had to consider the motion, what part of the DC circuit said, was that the case was dismissed out right, instead the full court sent it back, and said the lower court had to first "consider" the motion and then dismiss it. which of course he finally got around to doing
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom