MagicMike
Platinum Member
Being convicted of defrauding The United States is close enough.Constitutionally speaking, he hasn't been found guilty of insurrection.
THREAD FAIL.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Being convicted of defrauding The United States is close enough.Constitutionally speaking, he hasn't been found guilty of insurrection.
THREAD FAIL.
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.
Constitutionally speaking, Trump is toast.
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office. Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of...www.dailykos.com
Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.
Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.
Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.
Unfortunately for Trump it doesn't say any of that, and you have to make it up out-of thin air. That's not going to cut it.
1920 Eugene Debs ran for President from prison and was on the ballot.Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.
Constitutionally speaking, Trump is toast.
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office. Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of...www.dailykos.com
Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.
Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.
Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.
The letter of the law says yes.
Being convicted of defrauding The United States is close enough.
Well, does the Constitution define "who" it is that must find him to be guilty?
Is it State Secretaries of State?
The Senate?
The House?
Any other entity that would qualify for finding a President "guilty of insurrection"?
Right now, legally....we have to SOS's declaring him guilty.
Is that enough?
While that is true… this remains in the hands of a very right wing SCOTUSArticle II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.
Constitutionally speaking, Trump is toast.
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office. Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of...www.dailykos.com
Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.
Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.
Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.
Constitutionally speaking, Trump is toast.
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office. Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of...www.dailykos.com
Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.
Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.
Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.
You bleeve only what you WANT to bleeveI'm not likely to take Constitutional advice from the Daily Kook
President Trump: " Protest peacefully and patriotically". It was a protest, not an insurrection.Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.
Constitutionally speaking, Trump is toast.
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office. Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of...www.dailykos.com
Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.
Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.
Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.
One utterance in an hour long speech does not absolve him.President Trump: " Protest peacefully and patriotically". It was a protest, not an insurrection.
Why didn't democrats stop the protest riots of 2020? Hypocrites.One utterance in an hour long speech does not absolve him.
And his actions in not stopping that insurrection say everything
Fortunately for Trump, he has a Supreme Court dominated by corrupt, dishonest conservative ideologues who will once again ignore precedent and the Constitution.
Democracy. Got a problem with it?While that is true… this remains in the hands of a very right wing SCOTUS
I'm not likely to take Constitutional advice from the Daily Kook
You stupid little commie, all he needs is precedent from the 9th circuit court of appeals and their 2011 dismissal of the birther suit. They said individual voters lack standing to challenge the constitutional qualifications of a candidate.
.
One utterance in an hour long speech does not absolve him.
And his actions in not stopping that insurrection say everything
I agree with Trump being required to be on the ballot, but the Colorado and Maine Sec of State are not just "individual voters".
Democrats hate democracy. Hence the stolen election and bastardizing of the law.Democracy. Got a problem with it?