Constitutionally Speaking, Trump Is Toast

When was the last time a state SOS and a state civil court judge kicked the leading Presidential candidate off the ballot, Simp?
When was the last time a losing candidate for president tried to overturn an election using a slew of his barbarian follwers to stop Congress from certifying the results? Or by plotting to send a bunch of idiot fake electors to Congress?

Let's have it, CLOWN.
 
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.




Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.

Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.

Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.

These long, tedious cut and paste opinion pieces from leftist tabloids are boring.
 
When was the last time a losing candidate for president tried to overturn an election using a slew of his barbarian follwers to stop Congress from certifying the results? Or by plotting to send a bunch of idiot fake electors to Congress?

Let's have it, CLOWN.
Never.

Next?
 
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.




Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.

Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.

Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.

Ok.

But there's the problem: Only the joint session of Congress can decide.
 
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.




Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.

Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.

Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.
Daily fuckin' Kooks....GIGO...

SpamIntense.gif
 

No it's not. Read the constitution.

The electors meet in their respective states. They cast their ballots for President and Vice President separately. They then send the ballots sealed to the Congress. The joint session of Congress opens and counts the votes. If there are objections raised to any of the votes, then each house will consider those objections independently. The person with the most votes for President becomes the President elect, so long as she has achieved a majority of all votes. And the person with the most votes for Vice President becomes the Vice-President elect as long as they also achieve a majority. If the President-elect fails to quality then the duly elected Vice President becomes acting President until the President-elect qualifies, or until a President is elected.

The constitution clearly envisions the constitutional qualifications of a potential President to be analyzed after the votes are counted.
 
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Biden should be off all ballots.
Neither Biden or Trump have been convicted of anything. Although Biden is closer than anyone.
 
Constitutionally speaking, he hasn't been found guilty of insurrection.

THREAD FAIL.

The Constitution says nothing about being convicted of anything.

It says ENGAGES in insurrection.

Keep dancing skippy.
 
The Constitution says nothing about being convicted of anything.

It says ENGAGES in insurrection.

Keep dancing skippy.
It also says the only entity empowered to enforce the 14th is Congress, Simp.

:oops8:
 
No it's not. Read the constitution.

The electors meet in their respective states. They cast their ballots for President and Vice President separately. They then send the ballots sealed to the Congress. The joint session of Congress opens and counts the votes. If there are objections raised to any of the votes, then each house will consider those objections independently. The person with the most votes for President becomes the President elect, so long as she has achieved a majority of all votes. And the person with the most votes for Vice President becomes the Vice-President elect as long as they also achieve a majority. If the President-elect fails to quality then the duly elected Vice President becomes acting President until the President-elect qualifies, or until a President is elected.

The constitution clearly envisions the constitutional qualifications of a potential President to be analyzed after the votes are counted.
Bullshit.

Next!
 
Article II of the Constitution pertains to the Office of the President and Executive Powers. It makes clear the fact that the Presidency is indeed an Office.




Yep. The OFFICE of the Presidency. That makes him an OFFICER.

Now the Roberts court will be forced to rule for, or against the Constitution. If they rule against, then they are clearly saying the Presidency is not an office, AND saying they can inject themselves into the states decisions on federal elections.

Choose wisely John. The court won't always be conservative, and once it flips, your decision will have consequences.
The nation is dead anyway in that case. We are logically moving towards a dictatorship. The young are programmed now.
 
It sounds like you still need to read the colorado court ruling. He participated in insurrection.
The decision from the Colorado Supreme Court is a blatant attempt to remove a candidate from the ballot based purely on subjective claims of "insurrection." Purely based on language in the constitution that was introduced to prevent Confederate leaders / participants from holding office. It's been appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court where it will most likely get struct down.
Cheers!
 
No it's not. Read the constitution.

The electors meet in their respective states. They cast their ballots for President and Vice President separately. They then send the ballots sealed to the Congress. The joint session of Congress opens and counts the votes. If there are objections raised to any of the votes, then each house will consider those objections independently. The person with the most votes for President becomes the President elect, so long as she has achieved a majority of all votes. And the person with the most votes for Vice President becomes the Vice-President elect as long as they also achieve a majority. If the President-elect fails to quality then the duly elected Vice President becomes acting President until the President-elect qualifies, or until a President is elected.

The constitution clearly envisions the constitutional qualifications of a potential President to be analyzed after the votes are counted.
No, sorry. There is no requirement that congress decide. Nor to wait until votes are counted. Pure fantasy.

These aren't objections to votes. Nor can a 30 year old win the election, and be DQed after.
 

Forum List

Back
Top