Until conservatives can refute anything George Carlin said about their so-called pro-abortion stances, hush...
If George Carlin is (to you) any kind of an authority on the issue of abortion, you are not woth the time or effort.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Until conservatives can refute anything George Carlin said about their so-called pro-abortion stances, hush...
Deanna, pull your head out of your ass sweetheart. The middle class got a tax cut and the economy is booming. All it took was Obama leaving office and letting the folks who understand how things work take over. You're welcome.Pro-Life Rep. Tim Murphy Pressured Mistress to Get Abortion
Republicans also say tax cuts for billionaires really grows the economy.
You can't listen to these people. They lie.
Abortion really has nothing to do with teflon cooking pots.
If you make a little hat out of tinfoil and shove your head up your ass, you too can think like a liberal.Abortion really has nothing to do with teflon cooking pots.
Last night I watched a documentary on Netflix called the Devil We Know. The documentary was the story of the role of Dupont in the production, proliferation and manufacture of Teflon. Teflon is made from a chemical called C8. C8, also known as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), is man-made and used in the process of producing Teflon, known for its nonstick qualities. Following a barrage of lawsuits against DuPont for the release of C8 into the environment, production ended in 2015. 99% of American blood samples show we are all contaminated with C8.
C8 was known to cause birth defects, cancer and premature deaths in those exposed. The documentary had an interview with a child born of birth defects because his mother was exposed to the chemical. There were many more like him.
In a deposition when a Dupont corporate officer was asked whether C8 was a danger to the mother he was adamant that there was no such danger, the only danger, he protested, was "to the fetus".
Dupont has since discontinued C8 but its substitute is believed just as toxic.
There are tens of thousands of other chemical that are unregulated by the EPA. The same EPA that is being gutted by the Trump administration. The same Trump administration that is gutting discharge rules allowing more toxins into our air and water. C8 and its progeny are far from the only chemicals that cause these birth defects and premature deaths.
So, all these threads from conservatives condemning abortion is only so much claptrap if you are inconsistent with your beliefs. Begs the question of course whether if a profit is involved, you will turn the other way.
Where is your outrage here?
Why doesn’t Pelosi just pass a law banning it then?
The power belongs to the EPA. Instead of gutting the EPA, deregulating the discharge of toxins into the air and water, and giving passes to big polluters, the EPA mandate should be vigorously enforced.
The fact is it is not just Dupont but Monsanto, Dow, BASF, etc.not to mention mining corporations, that dump toxic effluents into the environment.
The interesting statistic was that it is not only 99% of Americans that have C8 in its system, but 95 % of the world population has C8 in its blood. We are all toxic superfund sites.
There are many ways I could have taken this thread, but since there were abortion threads sprouting up all over this forum, I asked the question why are these big polluters given a pass for the havoc they are reeking on the unborn and the living. Why do "pro-life" types pass up any condemnation of these companies and their actions? Why are so many "pro-lifers" against laws, rules and regulations that limit pollutants that would lessen the amount of birth defects?
The West Virginia town at the heart of the story, is very conservative. They knew what the Dupont plant was exposing their children and families to but they chose to turn a blind eye to the poisons being unleashed in their town. Why? I guess it comes down to a choice between jobs and health, even if we are talking the health of fetuses.
I think this a false choice, however. There is no reason why Dupont could not have spent some money keeping their employees safe as well as taking appropriate controls to limit discharge of C8 into the environment. Rather than do that, Dupont had engaged in a 50 year coverup.
Dupont makes $25 billion dollars a year. A shame that to make an extra buck they destroyed the lives of so many.
Last night I watched a documentary on Netflix called the Devil We Know. The documentary was the story of the role of Dupont in the production, proliferation and manufacture of Teflon. Teflon is made from a chemical called C8. C8, also known as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), is man-made and used in the process of producing Teflon, known for its nonstick qualities. Following a barrage of lawsuits against DuPont for the release of C8 into the environment, production ended in 2015. 99% of American blood samples show we are all contaminated with C8.
C8 was known to cause birth defects, cancer and premature deaths in those exposed. The documentary had an interview with a child born of birth defects because his mother was exposed to the chemical. There were many more like him.
In a deposition when a Dupont corporate officer was asked whether C8 was a danger to the mother he was adamant that there was no such danger, the only danger, he protested, was "to the fetus".
Dupont has since discontinued C8 but its substitute is believed just as toxic.
There are tens of thousands of other chemical that are unregulated by the EPA. The same EPA that is being gutted by the Trump administration. The same Trump administration that is gutting discharge rules allowing more toxins into our air and water. C8 and its progeny are far from the only chemicals that cause these birth defects and premature deaths.
So, all these threads from conservatives condemning abortion is only so much claptrap if you are inconsistent with your beliefs. Begs the question of course whether if a profit is involved, you will turn the other way.
Where is your outrage here?
Why doesn’t Pelosi just pass a law banning it then?
The power belongs to the EPA. Instead of gutting the EPA, deregulating the discharge of toxins into the air and water, and giving passes to big polluters, the EPA mandate should be vigorously enforced.
The fact is it is not just Dupont but Monsanto, Dow, BASF, etc.not to mention mining corporations, that dump toxic effluents into the environment.
The interesting statistic was that it is not only 99% of Americans that have C8 in its system, but 95 % of the world population has C8 in its blood. We are all toxic superfund sites.
There are many ways I could have taken this thread, but since there were abortion threads sprouting up all over this forum, I asked the question why are these big polluters given a pass for the havoc they are reeking on the unborn and the living. Why do "pro-life" types pass up any condemnation of these companies and their actions? Why are so many "pro-lifers" against laws, rules and regulations that limit pollutants that would lessen the amount of birth defects?
The West Virginia town at the heart of the story, is very conservative. They knew what the Dupont plant was exposing their children and families to but they chose to turn a blind eye to the poisons being unleashed in their town. Why? I guess it comes down to a choice between jobs and health, even if we are talking the health of fetuses.
I think this a false choice, however. There is no reason why Dupont could not have spent some money keeping their employees safe as well as taking appropriate controls to limit discharge of C8 into the environment. Rather than do that, Dupont had engaged in a 50 year coverup.
Dupont makes $25 billion dollars a year. A shame that to make an extra buck they destroyed the lives of so many.
No the power is with Congress to pass laws that companies need to abide by, not some bureaucracy that changes the rules on a whim.
So the question still stands, why haven’t Dems passed a bill making what DuPont did illegal?
Sure. Once it’s grown into a parent.Wha
What does a woman aborting a man’s baby without his consent have to do with privacy?For the authoritarian right abortion is about compelling conformity and expanding the authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty – in this case the right to privacy.
Likewise conservatives seek to expand the authority of their corporate masters at the expense of the health and well-being of consumers.
A fetus can give consent? Who knew
Some ignorant pukes are against contraception. I say we need a lot more emphasis on it. Preventing a pregnancy means no abortion. It's a win win. The life hasn't been conceived.
And you know what, mind your own business. How many do you know personally who have had an abortion? You must know them all. Any of your friends, relatives, kids? You? Don't answer, its none of my business.