Connect The Dots: One World Government

[paulitician]

The Globalist Elites have been planning their NWO for a long time. And they're making steady progress towards their goal. They have a lot of patience. They knew it would take many years. Their number one goal is to destroy nations' sovereignty. But they realize the U.S. will be the toughest nut to crack on that one. Most American Citizens truly do value their Constitution and sovereignty. But that is changing, as we observe the rise of the Big Government Socialists/Progressives and Neocons. They're both fervent Big Government Globalism supporters. Both have very little use for our Constitution. So our Nation's sovereignty is slipping away. Only true Constitutional Conservatives can save us now. I just hope more Americans realize that soon. Before it's too late.

What makes you think they haven't taken over already?

They are making plans to turn us into corporate slaves right now

They have to some extent. But they're not done. They haven't achieved their goal yet. But like i said, they have plenty of patience.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Your attempts to play rightwing extremist and try to use this as evidence that we are forfeiting our sovereignty is humorous and I'm not biting.

It’s not an attempt.

 

[eots]

Your attempts to play rightwing extremist and try to use this as evidence that we are forfeiting our sovereignty is humorous and I'm not biting.

It’s not an attempt.

why do you equate Resistance to loss of sovereignty and globalization with right wing ? or extremist

 

[NYcarbineer]

[
One question. Is the problem that another country pays it's workers 30 cents on the dollar, or is that government has made the societal costs for the standard of living sustainably high?

Can you even comprehend that question?

lol, WTF.

I don't see Americans working for 30 cents an hour. I see them expected to compete against workers IN OTHER COUNTRIES, UNDER OTHER LAWS, making 30 cents an hour.

That is globalization. That is one world government, under the guise of the happy sounding catchphrase,

'free trade'.

 

[eots]

[
One question. Is the problem that another country pays it's workers 30 cents on the dollar, or is that government has made the societal costs for the standard of living sustainably high?

Can you even comprehend that question?

lol, WTF.

I don't see Americans working for 30 cents an hour. I see them expected to compete against workers making 30 cents an hour.

and then with the profits they make from the slave wages they buy nuclear weapons and point them at you

 

[sparky]

lol

so the machinations of globailists who Partisan Chic normally sends packin' to the Alex Jones fringe are now targeted for HER agenda

~S~

 

[PoliticalChic]

Did you find the following beyond your abilities?
" Are the Left’s posters so weak, so insipid that they can’t muster an insightful attack to show that
a. the items in the OP are untrue?
b. or that world governance is a good idea?"

It's the assumptions and conclusions in your OP that you make which are either false or logical fallacies. Signing a climate change treaty does not mean the UN "taking control" of the country. Saying that foreigners don't value the US constitution as much as Americans do - an extremely arrogant supposition - does not mean a Justice hates the constitution. A "global minimum tax" means the US Treasury will tax companies on worldwide income, not some supranational organization will impose a tax on the US. Changing the colours on the DoJ website is not a harkening to some communist movement 80 years ago - real or imagined. As for the thing about the oceans, given how inaccurate, irrelevant and shrill the other four points in the OP are, and given that it comes from the extremist site, WND, we'll take a ginormous grain of salt.

I hope the sun is shining where you are today PC.

Actually, the weather has turned and it's grey and raining....kind of the way it's gonna be for you guys when we meet you in the playoffs.....
....but that's a tale for another time.

1. Your post seems grey and cloudy, too....that's what happens when you let ideology blind you.
"It's the assumptions and conclusions in your OP that you make...."
I guess you didn't notice that all five of the items that I chose are linked and sources....so it is questionable whether you can accurately claim that they are my assumptions.

2. "Signing a climate change treaty does not mean the UN "taking control" of the country."
Yeah, it does.
The IPCC is aimed at pressuring the Congress to pass laws that force US legislation in line with other nations, and " the portion of the IPCC to which he contributed had become "politicized" and that the IPCC leadership simply dismissed his concerns...."
Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What do you think the Kyoto Agreement would have meant?

And.."The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC or FCCC), aimed at fighting global warming. The UNFCCC is an international environmental treaty..."
Kyoto Protocol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Liberals, as a rule, can never connect the dots.....But I'm surprised at you.

3. "Saying that foreigners don't value the US constitution as much as Americans do - an extremely arrogant supposition..."
What????
Read this: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/u...und-the-world.html?_r=2&partner=MYWAY&ei=5065
The internationalist Ginsburg "I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,"

Read more: Ginsburg To Egyptians: I Wouldn't Use U.S. Constitution As A Model | Fox News
You should know the subject better, 'else you might be called 'arrogant.'

4. ""global minimum tax" means the US Treasury will tax companies on worldwide income, not some supranational organization will impose a tax on the US. "
That's exactly what Investor's Business Daily suggests.

You're not doing that well, here......

5. "Changing the colours on the DoJ website is not a harkening to some communist movement 80 years ago...blah blah blah...."
How about if the quote came from Marx...or Stalin....you still wouldn't see it as ominous, would you....

Try to remember it's the United States of America Department of Justice.

6. And, you knew you were on...if I can use this as a Canadian reference...'thin ice' and dropped any comment on the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Good move.
BTW...you might want to brush up on the "Responsibility to Protect doctrine" which removes sovereignty, as well, so you don't look as totally undressed as you do here.


Now, put 'em all together....and CONNECT THE DOTS!

 

[Big Fitz]

[
One question. Is the problem that another country pays it's workers 30 cents on the dollar, or is that government has made the societal costs for the standard of living sustainably high?

Can you even comprehend that question?

lol, WTF.

I don't see Americans working for 30 cents an hour. I see them expected to compete against workers IN OTHER COUNTRIES, UNDER OTHER LAWS, making 30 cents an hour.

That is globalization. That is one world government, under the guise of the happy sounding catchphrase,

'free trade'.

As suspected, you don't even have the ability to understand the question. Don't worry, I'll just put you down as a fail for the unit.

I for one am very against free trade with our enemies and those who are not on the same societal playing level as us as a nation.

Now why is it that those nations get away with paying their workers 30 cents an hour and still seem to survive? Why is it that we could NOT survive on 30 cents an hour for what we consider very menial and demanding work? Because we couldn't live off it? Could that be it?

Now... WHY could we not live off it? Do you ever consider this or are you too lacking in curiosity to bother asking it?

 

[PoliticalChic]

What about income imbalance, drives to turn back environmental laws, legislating against women, subordinating equal rights to religious doctrine? It goes both ways. Who's winning and will it really matter in the end, since One World Government is coming anyway?

1. Problem: income imbalance

Solution: work harder


...see how easy that was?

2. "...will it really matter in the end,..."
This could only be penned by a dunce who has never studied history.

Pinned the tail on the donkey, didn't I konny?

While that may be true, what does that have to do with One World Government? Pinned the tail on what? Are you delerious? Seems you can't even keep on the topic of your own OP!

1. A.D.D. reappearing, konny?
"... income imbalance..." was the first point in your post.
Glad you agree that I solved your problem....well, one of your problems.

2. "Pinned the tail on what?"
Refers to solving your problem....and the donkey?
That's you.
You do know what some folks call 'donkeys,' don't you?


3."Are you delerious?"
Although tempting, try not to blame me for your inadequacies.....after all, who do you think you are, Barack Obama???

 

[PoliticalChic]

lol

so the machinations of globailists who Partisan Chic normally sends packin' to the Alex Jones fringe are now targeted for HER agenda

~S~

What....???

No song??????

 

[ABikerSailor]

[
One question. Is the problem that another country pays it's workers 30 cents on the dollar, or is that government has made the societal costs for the standard of living sustainably high?

Can you even comprehend that question?

lol, WTF.

I don't see Americans working for 30 cents an hour. I see them expected to compete against workers IN OTHER COUNTRIES, UNDER OTHER LAWS, making 30 cents an hour.

That is globalization. That is one world government, under the guise of the happy sounding catchphrase,

'free trade'.

As suspected, you don't even have the ability to understand the question. Don't worry, I'll just put you down as a fail for the unit.

I for one am very against free trade with our enemies and those who are not on the same societal playing level as us as a nation.

Now why is it that those nations get away with paying their workers 30 cents an hour and still seem to survive? Why is it that we could NOT survive on 30 cents an hour for what we consider very menial and demanding work? Because we couldn't live off it? Could that be it?

Now... WHY could we not live off it? Do you ever consider this or are you too lacking in curiosity to bother asking it?

Because most of those countries with the low paying jobs don't have unions, and therefore, no middle class.

China however, IS starting to gain a middle class and quite quickly, which is one of the reasons that gas prices are going way up, as many newly middle class Chinese are buying cars for the first time.

The question is, why do we give tax breaks to companies that send our jobs overseas like Apple? Did you know that the ENTIRE US WORKFORCE FOR APPLE works only in sales and distribution, there are ZERO MANUFACTURING JOBS IN THE U.S.

Why is it that they are allowed to build their electronics overseas while selling them to us? Shouldn't they pay some kind of tax to the US Government for killing US jobs?

 

[Big Fitz]

lol, WTF.

I don't see Americans working for 30 cents an hour. I see them expected to compete against workers IN OTHER COUNTRIES, UNDER OTHER LAWS, making 30 cents an hour.

That is globalization. That is one world government, under the guise of the happy sounding catchphrase,

'free trade'.

As suspected, you don't even have the ability to understand the question. Don't worry, I'll just put you down as a fail for the unit.

I for one am very against free trade with our enemies and those who are not on the same societal playing level as us as a nation.

Now why is it that those nations get away with paying their workers 30 cents an hour and still seem to survive? Why is it that we could NOT survive on 30 cents an hour for what we consider very menial and demanding work? Because we couldn't live off it? Could that be it?

Now... WHY could we not live off it? Do you ever consider this or are you too lacking in curiosity to bother asking it?

Because most of those countries with the low paying jobs don't have unions, and therefore, no middle class.

China however, IS starting to gain a middle class and quite quickly, which is one of the reasons that gas prices are going way up, as many newly middle class Chinese are buying cars for the first time.

The question is, why do we give tax breaks to companies that send our jobs overseas like Apple? Did you know that the ENTIRE US WORKFORCE FOR APPLE works only in sales and distribution, there are ZERO MANUFACTURING JOBS IN THE U.S.

Why is it that they are allowed to build their electronics overseas while selling them to us? Shouldn't they pay some kind of tax to the US Government for killing US jobs?

Now you're starting to see it. Civilization has a cost. It expresses itself in every aspect of our life.

 

[ABikerSailor]

As suspected, you don't even have the ability to understand the question. Don't worry, I'll just put you down as a fail for the unit.

I for one am very against free trade with our enemies and those who are not on the same societal playing level as us as a nation.

Now why is it that those nations get away with paying their workers 30 cents an hour and still seem to survive? Why is it that we could NOT survive on 30 cents an hour for what we consider very menial and demanding work? Because we couldn't live off it? Could that be it?

Now... WHY could we not live off it? Do you ever consider this or are you too lacking in curiosity to bother asking it?

Because most of those countries with the low paying jobs don't have unions, and therefore, no middle class.

China however, IS starting to gain a middle class and quite quickly, which is one of the reasons that gas prices are going way up, as many newly middle class Chinese are buying cars for the first time.

The question is, why do we give tax breaks to companies that send our jobs overseas like Apple? Did you know that the ENTIRE US WORKFORCE FOR APPLE works only in sales and distribution, there are ZERO MANUFACTURING JOBS IN THE U.S.

Why is it that they are allowed to build their electronics overseas while selling them to us? Shouldn't they pay some kind of tax to the US Government for killing US jobs?

Now you're starting to see it. Civilization has a cost. It expresses itself in every aspect of our life.

Combine that with stuff like the internet, smart phones, Facebook and Twitter, it's much easier to get word out about things, and some issues take on a global face.

Look at OWS movements popping up all over the world, look at people leaning more towards democracy rather than their own opressive governments like Arab Spring, and yeah, eventually people are going to get used to talking and visiting with people from other places, and there may come a time when the UN is used as the jumping off point for a one world government.

 

[Toro]

I'm a little surprised that you're playing footsies with the nutter fringe, PC. I always thought you were smarter than that.

1. Your post seems grey and cloudy, too....that's what happens when you let ideology blind you.
"It's the assumptions and conclusions in your OP that you make...."
I guess you didn't notice that all five of the items that I chose are linked and sources....so it is questionable whether you can accurately claim that they are my assumptions.
2. "Signing a climate change treaty does not mean the UN "taking control" of the country."
Yeah, it does.
The IPCC is aimed at pressuring the Congress to pass laws that force US legislation in line with other nations, and " the portion of the IPCC to which he contributed had become "politicized" and that the IPCC leadership simply dismissed his concerns...."
Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What do you think the Kyoto Agreement would have meant?

And.."The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC or FCCC), aimed at fighting global warming. The UNFCCC is an international environmental treaty..."
Kyoto Protocol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Liberals, as a rule, can never connect the dots.....But I'm surprised at you.

I don't know about liberals, but generally it's difficult to connect dots that don't exist.

Kyoto didn't "give control" of the United States to the UN anymore than the other several hundred treaties the United States has signed over the past century.

Look outside PC, the black UN helicopters are coming to get you!

4. ""global minimum tax" means the US Treasury will tax companies on worldwide income, not some supranational organization will impose a tax on the US. "
That's exactly what Investor's Business Daily suggests.

You're not doing that well, here......

You telling me that I'm doing well here is like Truthmatters saying that conservatives don't believe in "sceince."

The fact that a shrill conservative hack says "it might happen one day" doesn't mean he isn't dead wrong.

Since you're the one falling back on your links, let's see the entire content upon which your premise is based.

Leadership: A global tax is the latest example of the idiocy that defines Joseph Biden's vice presidency. Dopiness a heartbeat away from the presidency shouldn't be tolerated.

If Arnold Schwarzenegger is the Terminator, promising "I'll be back," the best moniker for Joe Biden might be "the Dumb-Biden-ator," with the motto "I'll be stupid."

Yup, that's how it starts. Fabulous dialogue. A real serious article, fer sure.

And the meat of the argument is

But considering this administration's hostility to American exceptionalism, for all we know U.S. businesses could find themselves a couple of years from now subject to taxation dictated by corrupt international bodies like the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund or the World Bank. ObamaCare proves that you never can be sure what this president and his minions are really up to.

There it is. Scholarly "proof," that. But it's good enough for the Far Right!



Outstanding.

5. "Changing the colours on the DoJ website is not a harkening to some communist movement 80 years ago...blah blah blah...."
How about if the quote came from Marx...or Stalin....you still wouldn't see it as ominous, would you....

Try to remember it's the United States of America Department of Justice.

Communists are everywhere! They're everywhere! Someone open my closet! They're in there too! You'll see! Aaaaagggghhhhh!!!!

lol

6. And, you knew you were on...if I can use this as a Canadian reference...'thin ice' and dropped any comment on the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Good move.
BTW...you might want to brush up on the "Responsibility to Protect doctrine" which removes sovereignty, as well, so you don't look as totally undressed as you do here.


Now, put 'em all together....and CONNECT THE DOTS!

Yeah, I connect the dots and see that rdean isn't entirely wrong about the Right. Given that WND was the idiotic rag behind the idiotic birfer movement, link something a bit more serious and perhaps others outside the fringe nutter right will take this argument a bit more seriously.

 

[Big Fitz]

Because most of those countries with the low paying jobs don't have unions, and therefore, no middle class.

China however, IS starting to gain a middle class and quite quickly, which is one of the reasons that gas prices are going way up, as many newly middle class Chinese are buying cars for the first time.

The question is, why do we give tax breaks to companies that send our jobs overseas like Apple? Did you know that the ENTIRE US WORKFORCE FOR APPLE works only in sales and distribution, there are ZERO MANUFACTURING JOBS IN THE U.S.

Why is it that they are allowed to build their electronics overseas while selling them to us? Shouldn't they pay some kind of tax to the US Government for killing US jobs?

Now you're starting to see it. Civilization has a cost. It expresses itself in every aspect of our life.

Combine that with stuff like the internet, smart phones, Facebook and Twitter, it's much easier to get word out about things, and some issues take on a global face.

Look at OWS movements popping up all over the world, look at people leaning more towards democracy rather than their own opressive governments like Arab Spring, and yeah, eventually people are going to get used to talking and visiting with people from other places, and there may come a time when the UN is used as the jumping off point for a one world government.

OWS = freedom and democracy? Oh sorry, are you being serious? Arab Spring is nothing short of Islamo-fascism on the march. You think the Christian Right is a danger, you ain't seen nothing yet if they EVER establish themselves over here. The Occupados is just a bunch of malcontents that are nothing more than sock puppets for the uber radical far left.

Every megalomaniac wants to rule the world. Not even a committee will be able to do it, let alone hold it for long if they DO succeed.

 

[editec]

FREE TRADE IS the number one policy underpinning the ONE WORLD movement, kiddies.

Call that a leftist plot or rightest plot, doesn't much matter how you assign it on the scale of economics.

It is what it is.

 

[Big Fitz]

FREE TRADE IS the number one policy underpinning the ONE WORLD movement, kiddies.

Call that a leftist plot or rightest plot, doesn't much matter how you assign it on the scale of economics.

It is what it is.

Yes... and it is also not inevitable, nor eternal. Ask Rome how eternal was their empire. Or the Turks, or Mongols, or Greeks.

This is only a season of human events that really won't be doing well for much longer with the looming collapse.

Hard times sweat everyone. Or have we as a species forgotten that lesson?

 

[G.T.]

oh noes. I will build a bomb shelter immediately and bury gold in my back yard.

 

[L.K.Eder]

posted on april 1.

 

[konradv]

1. Problem: income imbalance

Solution: work harder


...see how easy that was?

2. "...will it really matter in the end,..."
This could only be penned by a dunce who has never studied history.

Pinned the tail on the donkey, didn't I konny?

While that may be true, what does that have to do with One World Government? Pinned the tail on what? Are you delerious? Seems you can't even keep on the topic of your own OP!

1. A.D.D. reappearing, konny?
"... income imbalance..." was the first point in your post.
Glad you agree that I solved your problem....well, one of your problems.

2. "Pinned the tail on what?"
Refers to solving your problem....and the donkey?
That's you.
You do know what some folks call 'donkeys,' don't you?

3."Are you delerious?"
Although tempting, try not to blame me for your inadequacies.....after all, who do you think you are, Barack Obama???

I get it! You ARE delerious. You actually think insults equate with discussion. What a loser.