Congress forcing new tanks on military

[Brain357]

Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists

I thought we wanted a balanced budget?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists

I thought we wanted a balanced budget?

Gotta replace the ones we gave to the Egyptians, ya know?

 

[fyrenza]

It's because, as we ALL know,

POLITICIANS know SO MUCH MOAR about what the military "needs,"

and the panel of military experts be DAMNED!

 

[Franticfrank]

They need to listen to the military, though the army may change their opinion whenever Kim Jong Un really goes overboard.

 

[editec]

Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists

I thought we wanted a balanced budget?

Somebody needs the sales, ergo the American people must buy tanks.

 

[Two Thumbs]

People need jobs. And who the hell is going to hire a former politician?



but seriously

250 Billion a year to improve a tank that is unchallengeable on the battlefield?

Nothing like getting a bigger hammer when you need a wrench.

 

[fyrenza]

WHY wouldn't those monies be put into improving the best of our best,

and R&D towards even better?

For real? I hope that y'all are able to get off of this planet,
because I don't foresee a good outcome to the shit that's going down, all around ALL of us/US.

that song, eh? silent running

 

[TemplarKormac]

Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists

I thought we wanted a balanced budget?

Somebody needs the sales, ergo the American people must buy tanks.

But you don't mind giving Muslim Extremists those tanks, do you? Hey, we had to pay for that too. Not to mention billions and billions of dollars of foreign aid to people who wish to kill us. Oh yeah, we paid for that too. Where's your outrage now, Liberal?

 

[Sallow]

People need jobs. And who the hell is going to hire a former politician?



but seriously

250 Billion a year to improve a tank that is unchallengeable on the battlefield?

Nothing like getting a bigger hammer when you need a wrench.

Especially since one of the easiest weapon systems to get rid of is a tank.

 

[TemplarKormac]

people need jobs. And who the hell is going to hire a former politician?



But seriously

250 billion a year to improve a tank that is unchallengeable on the battlefield?

nothing like getting a bigger hammer when you need a wrench.

e.g. Obamacare

 

[Sallow]

Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists

I thought we wanted a balanced budget?

Somebody needs the sales, ergo the American people must buy tanks.

But you don't mind giving Muslim Extremists those tanks, do you? Hey, we had to pay for that too.

What "Muslim Extremists"?

In any case, I am in favor of cutting all foreign military aid. All of it.

You guys make exceptions.

 

[Sallow]

people need jobs. And who the hell is going to hire a former politician?



But seriously

250 billion a year to improve a tank that is unchallengeable on the battlefield?

nothing like getting a bigger hammer when you need a wrench.

e.g. Obamacare

Boy you folks sure like to go off topic.

"ObamaCare" was the Republican alternative to single payer, but I am sure you guys don't remember that.

In any case, the conservative opposition to ObamaCare shows that conservatives have no interest, whatsoever, in the well being of the American People.

None.

 

[Sallow]

They need to listen to the military, though the army may change their opinion whenever Kim Jong Un really goes overboard.

It would be monumentally stupid to fight a conventional war with North Korea. But heck, conservatives are monumentally stupid. We fought them in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

[Two Thumbs]

People need jobs. And who the hell is going to hire a former politician?



but seriously

250 Billion a year to improve a tank that is unchallengeable on the battlefield?

Nothing like getting a bigger hammer when you need a wrench.

Especially since one of the easiest weapon systems to get rid of is a tank.

huh?

you mean sell it to another country or park and leave?

 

[Two Thumbs]

They need to listen to the military, though the army may change their opinion whenever Kim Jong Un really goes overboard.

It would be monumentally stupid to fight a conventional war with North Korea. But heck, conservatives are monumentally stupid. We fought them in Iraq and Afghanistan.

uhm

NK has a standing army, in uniforms, not a but of terrorists in towels, so conventional is clearly on the table.

 

[TemplarKormac]

They need to listen to the military, though the army may change their opinion whenever Kim Jong Un really goes overboard.

It would be monumentally stupid to fight a conventional war with North Korea. But heck, conservatives are monumentally stupid. We fought them in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yeah, that's the problem with you Liberals, too busy fighting people to cooperate with them. You people are such babies.

 

[fyrenza]

But you don't mind giving Muslim Extremists those tanks, do you? Hey, we had to pay for that too. Not to mention billions and billions of dollars of foreign aid to people who wish to kill us. Oh yeah, we paid for that too. Where's your outrage now, Liberal?

WoW!!!

Talk about your PRIMO CT!!!

THAT's why ~ so we could give 'em away to Muslim extremists!

Sounds legit to me.

 

[fyrenza]

Yeah, that's the problem with you Liberals, too busy fighting people to cooperate with them. You people are such babies.

Where "babies" = butt-hurt drama queens?

 

[Sallow]

They need to listen to the military, though the army may change their opinion whenever Kim Jong Un really goes overboard.

It would be monumentally stupid to fight a conventional war with North Korea. But heck, conservatives are monumentally stupid. We fought them in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yeah, that's the problem with you Liberals, too busy fighting people to cooperate with them. You people are such babies.

Seriously dude.

Stick to stuff you know about.

Like this conservative:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-rGnMKszxg]Man Shoots Himself - YouTube[/ame]

 

[fyrenza]

addendum : "where 'babies' = butt-hurt AND/OR BIG, BAD Wolf-impersonating drama queens?"