GOP ideas: “old and out of shape”

[Rawley]

It's either go with my lying eyes or accept your non-denial denial is not a denial.

View attachment 925604

LOL and you'll even give head to a statute.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I do have to admit that seeking to protect children from groomers is a pretty old-fashioned idea

The Democrat party is right on the cutting with this one.

 

[Seymour Flops]

It would be hilarious to see Russia, for example, bring a case to the UN Security Council where it accuses the US of breaching UN Conventions.

If the US was to breach the 1951 Convention on Refugees, of course.

Yes, that would be laughable. Is that really your idea of a shit storm?

 

[cnm]

How embarrassing to be the president of Mexico, and to have your primary issue, be making sure your citizens can escape your country into the United States, the most racist country ever in the history of the world?

But Mexico gets an unending stream of US made/sourced firearms in return, so there's that.

 

[Rawley]

Yes, that would be laughable. Is that really your idea of a shit storm?

You're dealing with a sheepherder that lives on an island.

 

[cnm]

LOL Going with Trump is a God, huh? You'll believe any shit put out by your cult's masters.

It is true I'd enjoy seeing Trump as POTUS again.

 

[cnm]

Yes, that would be laughable. Is that really your idea of a shit storm?

Watching the US deal with asylum applications on the spot with its current resources?

Yes.

It would be epic.

Not to mention the extra UN hilarity. We can see how much the US is enjoying the Israeli UN humour at the moment.

 

[scruffy]

That makes no sense. You either support logical governing or you don’t. The president has no impact on “culture”. Such a bullshit cop out by anti-intellectual knuckle draggers who don’t understand the policy of governing so they vote for people scaring them about gays and brown people.

Really? The race card AND the gay card?

Tell me again who's out of touch?

 

[Seymour Flops]

But Mexico gets an unending stream of US made/sourced firearms in return, so there's that.

Yeah, we make good stuff.

 

[cnm]

Going with Trump is a God, huh?

He is the one to save the US.

 

[martybegan]

Another one who won't understand the strictures and obligations of the 1951 Refugee Convention, despite being pointed in the right direction. Perhaps if it's laid out if front of them?

https://www.unhcr.org/3b66c2aa10

The 1951 Convention consolidates previous international instruments relat-ing to refugees and provides the most comprehensive codification of the rights of refugees at the international level. In contrast to earlier internation-al refugee instruments, which applied to specific groups of refugees, the 1951 Convention endorses a single definition of the term “refugee” in Article 1. ​

​

The emphasis of this definition is on the protection of persons from politi-​

cal or other forms of persecution. A refugee, according to the Convention, ​

is someone who is unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin ​

owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.​

​

The Convention is both a status and rights-based instrument and is under-​

pinned by a number of fundamental principles, most notably non-discrim-​

ination, non-penalization and non-refoulement. Convention provisions, for example, are to be applied without discrimination as to race, religion or coun-try of origin. Developments in international human rights law also reinforce the principle that the Convention be applied without discrimination as to sex, age, disability, sexuality, or other prohibited grounds of discrimination. ​

​

The Convention further stipulates that, subject to specific exceptions, refu-​

gees should not be penalized for their illegal entry or stay. This recognizes that the seeking of asylum can require refugees to breach immigration rules. ​

​

Prohibited penalties might include being charged with immigration or crim-inal offences relating to the seeking of asylum, or being arbitrarily detained purely on the basis of seeking asylum. Importantly, the Convention contains various safeguards against the expulsion of refugees. The principle of non-refoulement is so fundamental that no reservations or derogations may be made to it. It provides that no one shall expel or return (“refouler”) a refugee against his or her will, in any manner whatsoever, to a territory where he or she fears threats to life or freedom.​

​

Finally, the Convention lays down basic minimum standards for the treat-​

ment of refugees, without prejudice to States granting more favourable treat-ment. Such rights include access to the courts, to primary education, to work, and the provision for documentation, including a refugee travel document in passport form. Most States parties to the Convention issue this document, which has become as widely accepted as the former “Nansen passport”, an identity document for refugees devised by the first Commissioner for Refu-gees, Fridtjof Nansen, in 1922.​

They. Are. Not. Refugees.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Watching the US deal with asylum applications on the spot with its current resources?

Yes.

It would be epic.

Not to mention the extra UN hilarity. We can see how much the US is enjoying the Israeli UN humour at the moment.

It would be easy.

 

[leftwinger]

Like your NEW MARXIST ideas going back to Segregation days with colored drinking fountains? You don't know what you want or what you have you dumb OX. You wait for input from your communist leaders in China to Obiden. Kiss off gay boy.
********************

The Gill Tract Community Farm, which is co-owned by the University of California- Berkeley, has allegedly banned White people from their farm on Saturdays, designating the day exclusively for use by ‘Black, Indigenous, and People of Color’ (BIPOC).

A complaint was filed with the US Department of Education by the Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF), with some criticizing the move as an example of ‘systemic racism.’

According to their website,” The UC Gill Tract Community Farm is a collaborative community project between the University of California Berkeley and the local community, focused on issues of food justice and urban farming. It is located in Albany, CA, at the corner of San Pablo Ave and Marin Ave. It is an urban farm where you can come and harvest food for yourself and your family in exchange for help with weeding, planting, and watering. It also hosts a sliding-scale farmstand and partners with several East Bay community organizations and food pantries to distribute fresh organic produce to those who lack access to it.”

William Trachman, general counsel for MSLF, told The New York Post, “UC-Berkeley thinks that racial segregation is progressive now, but it’s no different than segregation of the past.”

 

[citygator]

California to spend $267M to crack down on âbrazenâ smash-and-grab store thefts

Here is the national retail federation report. No theft issue. Still no issue that you have pointed out to feel bad about the direction of the country.

 

[martybegan]

Here is the national retail federation report. No theft issue. Still no issue that you have pointed out to feel bad about the direction of the country.

View attachment 925624

No link, just a copypasta table.

 

[cnm]

They. Are. Not. Refugees.

The US government and the UN Convention says that has to be ruled in each case.

But only if you believe in the rule of law.

 

[martybegan]

The US government says it is not your call.

The US government is controlled by open border asshats.

 

[cnm]

No link, just a copypasta table.

Hilarity. I just gave you a link to a treaty which is supreme law of the land in the US and you dismissed it out of hand.

What a dork you are.

 

[cnm]

The US government is controlled by open border asshats.

I can see you don't believe in the rule of law. But it's still not your call.

 

[martybegan]

The US government and the UN Convention says that has to be ruled in each case.

But only if you believe in the rule of law.

This is abuse of law, not rule of law.