Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
It's time for Planned Parenthood (what a lie) to cough up some of the millions in taxpayer funds they receive annually to help women who can't afford to travel for an abortion. It's also time for states that make abortion illegal to beef up funding for the adoption of unwanted babies.Such as? Women who want to kill their unborn baby can still kill their unborn baby in most all Dem states that like killing their unborn babies.
The Supreme Court does not have the authority to make Constitutional RightsRoe granted a Constitutional right 50 years ago. Alito removed it. That is all that matters.
The court giveth and the court taketh away, eh? Why didn't the Democrats push for legislation to codify the same "rights" on the national level at some point over the last 50 years? My guess is it's because they always used the threat of overturning Roe as a way to beg for cash. Those on the Right do the same thing over gun rights.Roe granted a Constitutional right 50 years ago. Alito removed it. That is all that matters.
The majority of the voters did not want Roe overturned.
Oh, Coyote. you're so easily manipulated by propaganda.There is no question that overruling Roe will have severe implications for women at all levels, for years to come. That doesn't even begin to touch on the precedent this activist in removing a Constitutional right granted 50 years ago. I have never before heard of an individual right being taken away.
The effects will be devastating for many women.
Time to stop pretending this is "good for women" as if they are nothing more than stupid cows who don't know what how to make their own healthcare decisions.
Here is a taste of what to expect. Feel free to add more examples.
Vague 'medical emergency' exceptions in abortion laws leave pregnant people in danger, doctors say
Medical emergency exceptions are so vaguely defined in abortion laws, and with such harsh penalties for providers, physicians say they will be effectively unable to provide proper care.www.statnews.com
The wording varies slightly from state to state. Texas allows abortion for “a medical emergency”; Louisiana’s bill makes an exception to prevent “death or substantial risk of death,” or “permanent impairment of a life-sustaining organ”; and Idaho permits abortion “to prevent the death of the pregnant woman.” On Thursday, Oklahoma legislators approved a bill that would ban nearly all abortions starting from fertilization, with an exception to save the life of the mother “in a medical emergency.”
Those exceptions are so vaguely defined, and with such harsh penalties for providers deemed to have violated the terms, physicians say they will be effectively unable to provide proper medical care or even discuss abortion with patients.
It also isn’t the Supreme Court’s job to make decisions based on political ideology. Agree about Congress but not three recent decisions that overturned decades (a century for one) of precedent and case law following exactly on partisan political lines. It is very rare for SCOTUS to ever turn over such a ruling, much less 3 decided on strictly partisan lines (unlike the original rulings)..
It isn't the Supreme Court's job to Represent the will of the People, so that doesn't matter at all.
That's why the poster was telling you that your Representatives in Congress should have done their job, and they didn't.
.
It also isn’t the Supreme Court’s job to make decisions based on political ideology. Agree about Congress but not three recent decisions that overturned decades (a century for one) of precedent and case law following exactly on partisan political lines. It is very rare for SCOTUS to ever turn over such a ruling, much less 3 decided on strictly partisan lines (unlike the original rulings).
thank the lord they didnt do that and just based it on whats allowed by the constitutionIt also isn’t the Supreme Court’s job to make decisions based on political ideology. Agree about Congress but not three recent decisions that overturned decades (a century for one) of precedent and case law following exactly on partisan political lines. It is very rare for SCOTUS to ever turn over such a ruling, much less 3 decided on strictly partisan lines (unlike the original rulings).
It also isn’t the Supreme Court’s job to make decisions based on political ideology. Agree about Congress but not three recent decisions that overturned decades (a century for one) of precedent and case law following exactly on partisan political lines. It is very rare for SCOTUS to ever turn over such a ruling, much less 3 decided on strictly partisan lines (unlike the original rulings).
Indicting a former President of sedition, treason, and/or fraud is serious business. The DOJ has to get its ducks in a row. The Jan. 6 committee is assisting in that effort.What is stopping them?
Please tell me what I have gotten wrong.So you are trying to say your side gets it's news from "respected" sources? LOL!
Links? Exactly what precedents were overturned? Case specifics?It also isn’t the Supreme Court’s job to make decisions based on political ideology. Agree about Congress but not three recent decisions that overturned decades (a century for one) of precedent and case law following exactly on partisan political lines. It is very rare for SCOTUS to ever turn over such a ruling, much less 3 decided on strictly partisan lines (unlike the original rulings).
The Court's job is to follow the imperatives of natural and constitutional law. That means its job is to overturn every swinging dick and jane of Marxist bullshit the statist left has foisted on the Republic.It also isn’t the Supreme Court’s job to make decisions based on political ideology. Agree about Congress but not three recent decisions that overturned decades (a century for one) of precedent and case law following exactly on partisan political lines. It is very rare for SCOTUS to ever turn over such a ruling, much less 3 decided on strictly partisan lines (unlike the original rulings).
Indicting a former President of sedition, treason, and/or fraud is serious business. The DOJ has to get its ducks in a row. The Jan. 6 committee is assisting in that effort.
Not only is Trump a former President, elected by the rural counties of America, and because he is still popular with the rural folks, he is the leader of the Republican Party and the heavy favorite to be the Republican candidate for President in 2024.
The DOJ has to be careful to show they are not biased.
The truth of the matter is that this is nothing more than democrat political theater designed to distract from the myriad failures of this administration and the democrat party as a whole. More wasted taxpayer $$$ on scam investigations. If the democrats would work as hard for the country as they are working against the country, we would be the greatest nation on earth again.I don't think it will happen since at best all they have is possible conspiracy because they never went beyond talking about it.
Ironic when a pro-lifer bleats about saving children and banning abortion then turns around and blasts any attempt at regulating guns.
In a first, firearms became leading cause of death for U.S. children and teens
Gun deaths among children and teens rose by 29 percent in a single year, largely because of an increase in homicides.www.nbcnews.com
Indicting a former President of sedition, treason, and/or fraud is serious business. The DOJ has to get its ducks in a row. The Jan. 6 committee is assisting in that effort.
Not only is Trump a former President, elected by the rural counties of America, and because he is still popular with the rural folks, he is the leader of the Republican Party and the heavy favorite to be the Republican candidate for President in 2024.
The DOJ has to be careful to show they are not biased.
Please tell me what I have gotten wrong.
Trump Republicans are good at making baseless accusations.
That is because they can't substantiate their accusations. They do this over and over again.
Prove me wrong. What facts did I get wrong in my report?
The Jan. 6 committee is assisting in that effort.
LOL!
She insulted the DOJ and the FBI with that statement.
