progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 67,999
- 42,755
- 2,615
no thats the "keep" part of it you stupid fucking twit,,Same thing as "have"...in the context of the well regulated militia
Asshole
keep and bear
have and carry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no thats the "keep" part of it you stupid fucking twit,,Same thing as "have"...in the context of the well regulated militia
Asshole
Same thing as "have"...in the context of the well regulated militia
Asshole
Why can't they? They get donations from big time liberals all the time. Put that money to good use instead of killing babies.They do, or at least when I used get contraceptives 40 years ago it was free. However they can’t supply the entire need. If the state wants to ban abortion it is on them to provide affordable access to every means possible to prevent pregnancy.
They provide a lot of services but this one is on the states. They made the laws.Why can't they? They get donations from big time liberals all the time. Put that money to good use instead of killing babies.
what is it with you lazy fucks that makes you think the government should provide for your personal life??They provide a lot of services but this one is on the states. They made the laws.
Low income women need to learn to say the word "no"!Haven’t yet. But it certainly has for many low income women (who are usually the ones most in need and most vilified by the right for having children.
It says "funding". The taxpayer should not be paying so you can get laid without the threat of pregnancy.![]()
Some States Already Are Targeting Birth Control • Stateline
Last year, conservative Republicans in the Missouri legislature took a run at blocking Medicaid funding from going to Planned Parenthood, a frequent and prominent target of anti-abortion activists and politicians. But in the fine print of their measure, those Republicans revealed that their...www.pewtrusts.org
The government has decided to intrude on my personal life.what is it with you lazy fucks that makes you think the government should provide for your personal life??
It’s about control of women, it’s about control of political power, it’s about compelling conformity and punishing dissent – it’s what conservatives are.You (traitors) controlled them with the jab or you fired them. Move along.
Paying for a child is a lot more expensive for taxpayers than paying for contraception.It says "funding". The taxpayer should not be paying so you can get laid without the threat of pregnancy.
make you a deal,, all the birth control and abortions you want but the government has to OK when and who you have sex with,,The government has decided to intrude on my personal life.
But on a more practical consideration, banning abortion across a wide swath of America is going to have fallout.
Is your purpose to simply ban abortion and walk away?
Or does reducing unwanted pregnancies matter?
So, because my former state authorized Constitutional carry of firearms they need to provide me with the gun and ammunition to do so?They provide a lot of services but this one is on the states. They made the laws.
The idiotic irony of conservative dogma: ‘ban’ abortion and needlessly restrict access to birth control, and without access to birth control, unwanted pregnancies increase, resulting in more abortions.In the US the most effective contraceptives require a doctors visit and prescriptio. In Canada and much of Europe, women can get the pill without a prescription or over the counter. Not here.
In a perfect world, we shouldn't be doing that either.Paying for a child is a lot more expensive for taxpayers than paying for contraception.
I would think adopting out an unwanted baby in the womb by the baby's biological mother to its real mother 'to be', would certainly be better than dicing up an infant alive in the womb. On a lighter note below is a vid of a couple of baboos turned youngsters that might get a chuckle out of you!There is no question that overruling Roe will have severe implications for women at all levels, for years to come. That doesn't even begin to touch on the precedent this activist in removing a Constitutional right granted 50 years ago. I have never before heard of an individual right being taken away.
The effects will be devastating for many women.
Time to stop pretending this is "good for women" as if they are nothing more than stupid cows who don't know what how to make their own healthcare decisions.
Here is a taste of what to expect. Feel free to add more examples.
![]()
Vague 'medical emergency' exceptions in abortion laws leave pregnant people in danger, doctors say
Medical emergency exceptions are so vaguely defined in abortion laws, and with such harsh penalties for providers, physicians say they will be effectively unable to provide proper care.www.statnews.com
The wording varies slightly from state to state. Texas allows abortion for “a medical emergency”; Louisiana’s bill makes an exception to prevent “death or substantial risk of death,” or “permanent impairment of a life-sustaining organ”; and Idaho permits abortion “to prevent the death of the pregnant woman.” On Thursday, Oklahoma legislators approved a bill that would ban nearly all abortions starting from fertilization, with an exception to save the life of the mother “in a medical emergency.”
Those exceptions are so vaguely defined, and with such harsh penalties for providers deemed to have violated the terms, physicians say they will be effectively unable to provide proper medical care or even discuss abortion with patients.
your premise is a lie,,The idiotic irony of conservative dogma: ‘ban’ abortion and needlessly restrict access to birth control, and without access to birth control, unwanted pregnancies increase, resulting in more abortions.
Abortion was Never a Constitutional Right.So right off the batThere is no question that overruling Roe will have severe implications for women at all levels, for years to come. That doesn't even begin to touch on the precedent this activist in removing a Constitutional right granted 50 years ago. I have never before heard of an individual right being taken away.
The effects will be devastating for many women.
Time to stop pretending this is "good for women" as if they are nothing more than stupid cows who don't know what how to make their own healthcare decisions.
Here is a taste of what to expect. Feel free to add more examples.
![]()
Vague 'medical emergency' exceptions in abortion laws leave pregnant people in danger, doctors say
Medical emergency exceptions are so vaguely defined in abortion laws, and with such harsh penalties for providers, physicians say they will be effectively unable to provide proper care.www.statnews.com
The wording varies slightly from state to state. Texas allows abortion for “a medical emergency”; Louisiana’s bill makes an exception to prevent “death or substantial risk of death,” or “permanent impairment of a life-sustaining organ”; and Idaho permits abortion “to prevent the death of the pregnant woman.” On Thursday, Oklahoma legislators approved a bill that would ban nearly all abortions starting from fertilization, with an exception to save the life of the mother “in a medical emergency.”
Those exceptions are so vaguely defined, and with such harsh penalties for providers deemed to have violated the terms, physicians say they will be effectively unable to provide proper medical care or even discuss abortion with patients.
those cases are few and far between and we can handle them better than a foreign country,,A reality where anortion is banned.
![]()
Woman who could die because doctors won't give abortion speaks out
Andrea Prudente, 38, has a ruptured membrane and detached placenta - but the fetus still has a heartbeat. Doctors are refusing to terminate the pregnancy since abortion is illegal in Malta.www.dailymail.co.uk