Comey Turns Himself in this Morning

[Nuthin' Fancy]

It Sure Looks Like Kash Patel Lied Under Oath About ...​

The New Republic
https://newrepublic.com › breaking-news
Sep 16, 2025 — It Sure Looks Like Kash Patel Lied Under Oath About Jeffrey Epstein. Patel made his most unbelievable claim yet about Epstein and his supposed client list.


“Himself,” Patel quickly answered. “There is no credible information, none. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information that we have—again—is limited.”

“So, the answer is no one?” asked Kennedy, somewhat incredulously.

“For the information that we have,” Patel replied.


The FBI director also admitted that he hadn’t actually done the reading. “I have not reviewed the entirety of [the Epstein files] myself, but a good amount,” he said.

Patel’s claim that Epstein, who was indicted by federal prosecutors on charges related to sex trafficking minors in 2019, had procured dozens of women just for himself directly contradicts a trove of testimony from the survivors of Epstein’s abuse.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Well one was a targeted because of his political beliefs by a fascist regime that used force to try and chill anyone speaking out against it

We know, Q-NUT...............

The second Simone a return to normal DOJ policies in prosecuting criminals in our republic

Sure, when Trump goes to prison.

 

[krichton]

His mugshot won't look nearly as good as Trump's.

If the FBI follows the example the Democrat FBI set in the last four years, they'll go to his house predawn with a paramilitary unit and drag him out of his house in front of whoever he lives with.

Did that happen to Trump? And if it did, would it have been justified considering that he ignored a subpoena to return all the stolen top secret files took after 18 months?

 

[struth]

We know, Q-NUT...............


View attachment 1172488

Sure, when Trump goes to prison.

You all tried to lock up your political rival before and the constitution got in the way

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You all tried to lock up your political rival before and the constitution got in the way

That was Trump's cult.

Senate acquits Trump of inciting deadly Capitol attack​

Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2021/02/13 › trump...
Feb 13, 2021 — Seven Republicans broke with their party to convict the former president — well short of the two-thirds required.

They're TRAITORS too.

 

[struth]

That was Trump's cult.

Senate acquits Trump of inciting deadly Capitol attack​

View attachment 1172490
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2021/02/13 › trump...
Feb 13, 2021 — Seven Republicans broke with their party to convict the former president — well short of the two-thirds required.

They're TRAITORS too.

Holy shit dembot the senate doesn’t lock people up for impeachments

You are dumb

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Holy shit dembot the senate doesn’t lock people up for impeachments

You are dumb

WTF Q-NUT?

You're beyond DUMB.

I didn't say they did, impeachment removes them from office.

Then prosecutions can begin.

 

[struth]

WTF Q-NUT?

You're beyond DUMB.

I didn't say they did, impeachment removes them from office.

Then prosecutions can begin.

The prosecutions began when he left office you idiot

You had four years to jail him but the constitution got in your way

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

The prosecutions began when he left office you idiot

You had four years to jail him but the constitution got in your way

It wasn't the constitution you MORON.

The DOJ dropped their case.

 

[struth]

It wasn't the constitution you MORON.

The DOJ dropped their case.

Because the Constitution prevented them from jailing someone simply for political reasons

 

[Seymour Flops]

Did that happen to Trump? And if it did, would it have been justified considering that he ignored a subpoena to return all the stolen top secret files took after 18 months?

Well, no.

They did not drag Trump out of his home when they raided his home. The phrase "thank God for small favors" comes to mind. I suppose the FBI agents preferred not to tangle with the Secret Service's commandos in suits that guard presidents and former presidents.

You seriously think that would have been a good idea?

Are you implying the FBI never did that to anyone?

Comey was no president, nor anywhere close to that level, no matter what delusions of grandeur he had as a kingmaker. He was more on a level with General Flynn and well deserves the same treatment Flynn got.

 

[krichton]

Well, no.

They did not drag Trump out of his home when they raided his home. The phrase "thank God for small favors" comes to mind. I suppose the FBI agents preferred not to tangle with the Secret Service's commandos in suits that guard presidents and former presidents.

You seriously think that would have been a good idea?

Are you implying the FBI never did that to anyone?

Comey was no president, nor anywhere close to that level, no matter what delusions of grandeur he had as a kingmaker. He was more on a level with General Flynn and well deserves the same treatment Flynn got.

But in your previous that was what you were claiming. That they should drag Comey out, presumably in handcuffs, like they did with Trump? That actually would have been wonderful to see, because the FBI would never ever make such a consideration for anyone else who stole government secrets.

 

[Seymour Flops]

But in your previous that was what you were claiming. That they should drag Comey out, presumably in handcuffs, like they did with Trump?

No, I never said that. I said:

If the FBI follows the example the Democrat FBI set in the last four years,

That actually would have been wonderful to see, because the FBI would never ever make such a consideration for anyone else who stole government secrets.

The told Biden will in advance when they were going to search his garage and worse, when they were going to search a storage unit he had control over.

Biden had no legal basis to have taken and kept the files. Trump followed the precedent of every single U.S. president starting with G. Washinton in taking what he deemed to be personal notes and copies as he left the White House.

 

[Seymour Flops]

It would be great if the lawfare would end. But it cannot end by Republicans saying "we need to stop this weaponization of the justice system" and Democrats lisping, "Yeah! Thop doing that, you weaponizer guys!"

The Democrats are taking the brunt of it right now. They need to come to the table, apologize for their nine years of weaponized intelligence and justice and offer to agree on some ground rules to prevent such shenanigans in the future.

It was just fun and games for Dems but lives were changed, people were forced to plead guilty on pain of having family members gone after, and of course life savings for public servants were spent on legal defense.

Dems won't be willing to fix it until they feel some of the pain, as well.

 

[MayorQuimby]

It would be great if the lawfare would end. But it cannot end by Republicans saying "we need to stop this weaponization of the justice system" and Democrats lisping, "Yeah! Thop doing that, you weaponizer guys!"

The Democrats are taking the brunt of it right now. They need to come to the table, apologize for their nine years of weaponized intelligence and justice and offer to agree on some ground rules to prevent such shenanigans in the future.

It was just fun and games for Dems but lives were changed, people were forced to plead guilty on pain of having family members gone after, and of course life savings for public servants were spent on legal defense.

Dems won't be willing to fix it until they feel some of the pain, as well.

IMO we should go beyond that. Find out who it was that directed the Democratic party to weaponize the FBI and the justice system. Stuff like this doesn't just come from nowhere. There must have someone, or a group of people, who were the mastermind behind it. And there must have been money involved, too, because to infiltrate an agency like the FBI is not easy, takes time, and I bet it takes money, too (to do some serious bribing). With these clues in mind, we should be able to get a pretty good picture of who to go after.

 

[Seymour Flops]

IMO we should go beyond that. Find out who it was that directed the Democratic party to weaponize the FBI and the justice system. Stuff like this doesn't just come from nowhere. There must have someone, or a group of people, who were the mastermind behind it. And there must have been money involved, too, because to infiltrate an agency like the FBI is not easy, takes time, and I bet it takes money, too (to do some serious bribing). With these clues in mind, we should be able to get a pretty good picture of who to go after.

You are correct. Absolutely.

Someone was coordinating all that. It was too orchestrated not to have any central planning. Someone told Merrick Garland, for example, to send his top deputy to help DEI Bragg with the case against Trump. Garland is a low-level intellect and a very passive person who would have been much happier on the USSC not writing his own opinions, but just signing on to Sotomayor's every time.

Most likely, it was someone - several someones - put into the justice department during Obama's second term and still anwering to him.

Jack Smith needs to be prosecuted. McCabe, Strozk and Page should go under the jail.

For an equitable tit-for-tat, they would have to prosecute Pedo Joe. You prosecute our top guy, we prosecute your top guy. But it would never fly. Shortly into his administration, he lost his mental faculties and it would be like prosecuting zippy the pinhead for throwing his feces at a carnival goer.

Real justice would be to wait until a front-runner appears on the Democrat side for 2028 and go after him or her. But anyone who would be both willing to front for the wreck that the Democratic Party has become AND acceptable to the most radical element of it would have so little chance at winning that we would not want to give them an excuse for the electoral landslide sure to follow.

 

[MayorQuimby]

You are correct. Absolutely.

Someone was coordinating all that. It was too orchestrated not to have any central planning. Someone told Merrick Garland, for example, to send his top deputy to help DEI Bragg with the case against Trump. Garland is a low-level intellect and a very passive person who would have been much happier on the USSC not writing his own opinions, but just signing on to Sotomayor's every time.

Most likely, it was someone - several someones - put into the justice department during Obama's second term and still anwering to him.

Jack Smith needs to be prosecuted. McCabe, Strozk and Page should go under the jail.

For an equitable tit-for-tat, they would have to prosecute Pedo Joe. You prosecute our top guy, we prosecute your top guy. But it would never fly. Shortly into his administration, he lost his mental faculties and it would be like prosecuting zippy the pinhead for throwing his feces at a carnival goer.

Real justice would be to wait until a front-runner appears on the Democrat side for 2028 and go after him or her. But anyone who would be both willing to front for the wreck that the Democratic Party has become AND acceptable to the most radical element of it would have so little chance at winning that we would not want to give them an excuse for the electoral landslide sure to follow.

Absolutely agree, sir.

Why don't you put together a webpage and put your cogent analysis on it, so that more people can see? Or if you prefer, you can try and reach out to other like-minded people on the internet, people with an investigative mindset, and encourage them to get to the bottom of this? I really believe we have stumbled upon something that's evil and enormous. If we can solve this intricate web of plots and intrigue, we will be doing such a great service to the country and her people.

Kindly let me know if there is any way I can be of help to you, sir.

 

[Robert W]

You are correct. Absolutely.

Someone was coordinating all that. It was too orchestrated not to have any central planning. Someone told Merrick Garland, for example, to send his top deputy to help DEI Bragg with the case against Trump. Garland is a low-level intellect and a very passive person who would have been much happier on the USSC not writing his own opinions, but just signing on to Sotomayor's every time.

Most likely, it was someone - several someones - put into the justice department during Obama's second term and still anwering to him.

Jack Smith needs to be prosecuted. McCabe, Strozk and Page should go under the jail.

For an equitable tit-for-tat, they would have to prosecute Pedo Joe. You prosecute our top guy, we prosecute your top guy. But it would never fly. Shortly into his administration, he lost his mental faculties and it would be like prosecuting zippy the pinhead for throwing his feces at a carnival goer.

Real justice would be to wait until a front-runner appears on the Democrat side for 2028 and go after him or her. But anyone who would be both willing to front for the wreck that the Democratic Party has become AND acceptable to the most radical element of it would have so little chance at winning that we would not want to give them an excuse for the electoral landslide sure to follow.

Obama himself ordered the attacks on Trump. If you are interested, pm me for the link to the paper proving my comments are true.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Obama himself ordered the attacks on Trump. If you are interested, pm me for the link to the paper proving my comments are true.

Sent.

 

[cnm]

Meh, a Virginia GJ thought there was enough evidence presented to indict.

I hope he enjoys the process. He should plead-out and avoid the "red tape".

It's almost as though you think a fig leaf of 'evidence' means Chump won't purely be extracting revenge by imposing that on Comey.