Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
It looks like Zucker is screwed.Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based.
Ok.
View attachment 424409
Georgia’s Video Recording Laws (chancoschiffer.com)
you still would need to notify the participants as far as i know. in multi-region meetings you usually must assume 2 party consent and ask for permission.You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.
'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them'
So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.
who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.
Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated,
Jurisdiction is determined by where the parties are.
Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from New York, would that mean the laws of New York would apply instead of the laws of Georgia?
Yes.
Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Don't be so hard on yourself.
Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based.
Ok.
View attachment 424409
Georgia’s Video Recording Laws (chancoschiffer.com)
you still would need to notify the participants as far as i know. in multi-region meetings you usually must assume 2 party consent and ask for permission.You can record simply by using an app that records what's on your screen.No, the default is that only the host can record. In order for anyone else to record, the host has to make that person a co- host, and that doesn't happen accidentally.Democrats don't know how to run a secure teleconference...surprise, surprise. Another 'hot mic' incident, and liberals are pissed they got caught.....again.then it's not hacking if someone FW'd the invite to him. the invite may or may not include the password for ease of meeting entry. but again, once there, a participant can't record someone elses meeting UNLESS the admin of the meeting set the option to allow it. maybe he recorded it with an external device and not local.I don't think it was just dialing in to the meeting, Bripat. I use Zoom most every day for conferences, meetings, and for classes I initiate. They all show who else is in the Zoom; uninvited guests are easily booted off. Only the host can give a participant permission to record, and Zuckerberg obviously wouldn't have given it to O'Keefe. So the correct wording here is HACKED. Which last I knew was illegal.These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.
'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them'
So uninformed
He was invited in and given the dial in number
By a (wait for it) whistleblower.
who knows. but it still seems like a ton of risk to prove something everyone already knows.
Nope. If the person recording is in a one-party state, the other participants to the call do not need to be notified and consent, even if they are in two party States. At least that's the law in Mississippi, Kansas, and other one-party states that I have litigated cases involving this very issue.
Commit the crime, do the time. What's the problem?These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.
'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them'
How did O'Keefe "hack into" the conversation?Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based.
Ok.
View attachment 424409
Georgia’s Video Recording Laws (chancoschiffer.com)
Wow, are you really that stupid? So, you can hack into a conversation, and since you, the hacker, consent to it be recorded, it is OK? Seriously? I mean wow, the willful ignorance of the Trumpbots is astounding.
What crime?Commit the crime, do the time. What's the problem?These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.
'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them'
If no crime, then no time. What's the problem?What crime?Commit the crime, do the time. What's the problem?These are the same fake news drones who defend the "defund the police" movement. He "spied on them" when he dialed in to a conference.
'Suppression media!': Trump slams CNN over boss Jeff Zucker's hacked conference calls in which he tells staff not to 'normalize Trump's erratic behavior' - as network reports Project Veritas to cops for 'spying on them'
How did O'Keefe "hack into" the conversation?Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based.
Ok.
View attachment 424409
Georgia’s Video Recording Laws (chancoschiffer.com)
Wow, are you really that stupid? So, you can hack into a conversation, and since you, the hacker, consent to it be recorded, it is OK? Seriously? I mean wow, the willful ignorance of the Trumpbots is astounding.
Federal law requires at least one party consent.
Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based.
Ok.
View attachment 424409
Georgia’s Video Recording Laws (chancoschiffer.com)
Wow, are you really that stupid? So, you can hack into a conversation, and since you, the hacker, consent to it be recorded, it is OK? Seriously? I mean wow, the willful ignorance of the Trumpbots is astounding.
Who the fawk cares where O'Keefe is based. Seriously, do you not know anything about the law?
You don't care about New York law? LOL!
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based. I mean damn, you are better than this. Think about it, maybe he could have taped it from Somalia, would that mean the laws of Somalia would apply instead of the laws of Georgia. Damn, but the stupid here is beyond belief.
Jurisdiction is determined by where the meeting originated, not where the asshole that secretly taped it is based.
Ok.
View attachment 424409
Georgia’s Video Recording Laws (chancoschiffer.com)
Wow, are you really that stupid? So, you can hack into a conversation, and since you, the hacker, consent to it be recorded, it is OK? Seriously? I mean wow, the willful ignorance of the Trumpbots is astounding.
Do they have any evidence of a crime?
Recording a call is perfectly legal in Georgia.
Federal law requires at least one party consent.
Federal? New York state has no say? Georgia has no say?
Why don't you post the federal law that you think backs your claim?
Federal law requires at least one party consent.
Federal? New York state has no say? Georgia has no say?
Why don't you post the federal law that you think backs your claim?
18 U.S.C. § 2511 - U.S. Code Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 2511 | FindLaw
