CNN Anchor Tells Nancy Pelosi That Trump Was Acquitted — She Interrupts, Claims He Wasn’t

[beagle9]

Hilarious watching the Left cling to their impeachment fiasco like they clinched to the RUSSIA! lie for so long.

It's all they got.

 

[BS Filter]

 

[Rye Catcher]

No, they didn't. Not in the Senate. Why would you say they did?

13 witnesses, over 2800 pages of documents.

They still had no case.

TOTAL EXONERATION!

^^^ Diarrhea of the mouth ^^^, same old stink day after day. This arrogant jerk has nothing of substance to offer and echoes the usual RW Propaganda as if it is original.

Will Nostra ever figure out he(?) has no credibility?

More credibility than of you retarded libs.

You show a high degree of intelligence and use of decorum. Your use of links and data to support your well thought out opinions belie any effort by me to criticize any post of yours.



[Sometimes sarcasm is an effective tool when dealing with jerks like you. For the readers who think ... err ... believe you have anything substantive, thoughtful and thought provoking, I pity them]

Truth hurts. Here's more, Dems suck.

Thanks for proving your inability to post anything substantive or credible; there are millions of Democrats living in every state in our union who do not "suck", as there are millions of Republicans who do not "suck", because most of them are educated, urbane and open minded - characteristics which you do not have.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

I can't decide if you are really as stupid as your many posts suggest, or that you are an agitator in training and still can't pass muster as a successful one. Of course I might be correct on both counts.

Committee hearings are not trials. Anyone who is not stupid or willingly obtuse knows this. And, BTW, your comment is nothing more than an echo of so many others, please don't pretend you had an original thought. I know you don't have that ability.

If he was stupid he would be a lib.

Your post is not only absurd it is a ludicrous ad hominem; in my terms, a double Idiot-Gram.

I suppose the biddable fools who attend trump rallies and chant together, "lock her up" are jurors who have heard evidence which is probative to some crime and have found HRC guilty; are they examples of an intelligent and thinking coterie.

Wake up and smell the coffee, trump is not only a demagogue and a charlatan he is intentionally divisive, and has intentionally created hate among his followers. Too many of the posts, such as your, "if he was stupid he would be a lib", have dominated this message board.

Intentionally defensive when attacked, but we weren't suppose to notice the leftist attacks on Trump, but rather just the bulldog defensive responses by Trump when attacked eh ??

The attacks, so you say, on trump are based on facts and evidence. He is corrupt, he is a cheat, he is liar and he is has attacked everyone who doesn't kiss his fat ass.

He destroys people's lives, he's been divorced twice and his first wife accused him of rape; he has bribed two women he had affairs with, and attacked both of their characters, one of whom when his current wife was pregnant with his youngest son. He has been sued numerous times, declared bankruptcy in a way to have his debts absolved, causing workers whose labor for him was never paid.

Anyone who has access to the DSM 5 needs to read the definitions on Personality Disorders, Trump has at least one in each of the Three Clusters:

For those who are curious and not afraid to see the naked truth in trump's mental health, see:

How to Recognize a Personality Disorder

 

[beagle9]

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

I can't decide if you are really as stupid as your many posts suggest, or that you are an agitator in training and still can't pass muster as a successful one. Of course I might be correct on both counts.

Committee hearings are not trials. Anyone who is not stupid or willingly obtuse knows this. And, BTW, your comment is nothing more than an echo of so many others, please don't pretend you had an original thought. I know you don't have that ability.

If he was stupid he would be a lib.

Your post is not only absurd it is a ludicrous ad hominem; in my terms, a double Idiot-Gram.

I suppose the biddable fools who attend trump rallies and chant together, "lock her up" are jurors who have heard evidence which is probative to some crime and have found HRC guilty; are they examples of an intelligent and thinking coterie.

Wake up and smell the coffee, trump is not only a demagogue and a charlatan he is intentionally divisive, and has intentionally created hate among his followers. Too many of the posts, such as your, "if he was stupid he would be a lib", have dominated this message board.

Intentionally defensive when attacked, but we weren't suppose to notice the leftist attacks on Trump, but rather just the bulldog defensive responses by Trump when attacked eh ??

The attacks, so you say, on trump are based on facts and evidence. He is corrupt, he is a cheat, he is liar and he is has attacked everyone who doesn't kiss his fat ass.

He destroys people's lives, he's been divorced twice and his first wife accused him of rape; he has bribed two women he had affairs with, and attacked both of their characters, one of whom when his current wife was pregnant with his youngest son. He has been sued numerous times, declared bankruptcy in a way to have his debts absolved, causing workers whose labor for him was never paid.

Anyone who has access to the DSM 5 needs to read the definitions on Personality Disorders, Trump has at least one in each of the Three Clusters:

For those who are curious and not afraid to see the naked truth in trump's mental health, see:

How to Recognize a Personality Disorder

With any president, we can only deal with the present, and what they do in the job we hired them for. If have alternative reasons for getting rid of someone, then of course you do what the left is doing, and that is to attack a person on their entire life basically figuring that he's got to be guilty enough to cause him to be changed out because of something. So witch hunts and fishing expeditions are the order of the day in trying to unseat a sitting president. Not as easy as the left thought, so they just keep on making crazies of themselves in doing so. TDS is real.

 

[Care4all]

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

The house did the best that they could under the circumstances, and the Senate did NOT.

Under what circumstances?

Obstruction, of an official investigation in to himself!

 

[Lysistrata]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

 

[hadit]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Trump, acquitted, forever. You might as well insist Hillary actually won, for all the good it does.

 

[Lysistrata]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Trump, acquitted, forever. You might as well insist Hillary actually won, for all the good it does.

So you support corruption in the nation's legislature. I said that this "acquittal" exists on paper.
I wonder why you would support someone like trump if you think of yourself as a patriotic American.

 

[hadit]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Trump, acquitted, forever. You might as well insist Hillary actually won, for all the good it does.

So you support corruption in the nation's legislature. I said that this "acquittal" exists on paper.
I wonder why you would support someone like trump if you think of yourself as a patriotic American.

The House failed to make the case that Trump should be removed from office. That's the bottom line. Acquittal was granted by the Senate, the body authorized to make that call. You were not, thus Trump is forever acquitted.

 

[Nostra]

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

The house did the best that they could under the circumstances, and the Senate did NOT.

Under what circumstances?

Obstruction, of an official investigation in to himself!

You mean challenging invalid subpoenas.

Apparently you aren't aware that the Congress and Executive are CO-EQUAL branches of govt. The WH doesn't have to jump every time Adumb Schifferbrains says to.

The Constitutional system we have is for disputes between the two to go to the Judicial for resolution. That isn't obstruction, Moron.

 

[Nostra]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Dimwinger Senators were on record with their decision before the trial, so why is it just misconduct by Republicans, Hack?

 

[toobfreak]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Trump, acquitted, forever. You might as well insist Hillary actually won, for all the good it does.

Trump looks pretty acquitted to me!

125,000 cheering him. Every red arrow a Trump sign. Every white head or white dot a white ballcap saying Welcome Trump!

On top of that, an entire city and miles of roads lined with flowers and Trump signs!

BEST IMPEACHMENT THE DEMOCRATS EVER DID!

 

[hadit]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Dimwinger Senators were on record with their decision before the trial, so why is it just misconduct by Republicans, Hack?

If they were really serious about it, they would be insisting the trial was rigged from the start because the democrat Senators running for president refused to recuse themselves, despite the obvious conflict of interest.

 

[JusticeHammer]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Trump, acquitted, forever. You might as well insist Hillary actually won, for all the good it does.

So you support corruption in the nation's legislature. I said that this "acquittal" exists on paper.
I wonder why you would support someone like trump if you think of yourself as a patriotic American.

Because Trump is more patriotic than any retarded demoncrap.

 

[Care4all]

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

The house did the best that they could under the circumstances, and the Senate did NOT.

Under what circumstances?

Obstruction, of an official investigation in to himself!

You mean challenging invalid subpoenas.

Apparently you aren't aware that the Congress and Executive are CO-EQUAL branches of govt. The WH doesn't have to jump every time Adumb Schifferbrains says to.

The Constitutional system we have is for disputes between the two to go to the Judicial for resolution. That isn't obstruction, Moron.

Phony baloney objections, blanket immunity of the entire white house staff crud are not legal objections.... judicial precedence already exists to cover it.

 

[Rye Catcher]

I can't decide if you are really as stupid as your many posts suggest, or that you are an agitator in training and still can't pass muster as a successful one. Of course I might be correct on both counts.

Committee hearings are not trials. Anyone who is not stupid or willingly obtuse knows this. And, BTW, your comment is nothing more than an echo of so many others, please don't pretend you had an original thought. I know you don't have that ability.

If he was stupid he would be a lib.

Your post is not only absurd it is a ludicrous ad hominem; in my terms, a double Idiot-Gram.

I suppose the biddable fools who attend trump rallies and chant together, "lock her up" are jurors who have heard evidence which is probative to some crime and have found HRC guilty; are they examples of an intelligent and thinking coterie.

Wake up and smell the coffee, trump is not only a demagogue and a charlatan he is intentionally divisive, and has intentionally created hate among his followers. Too many of the posts, such as your, "if he was stupid he would be a lib", have dominated this message board.

Intentionally defensive when attacked, but we weren't suppose to notice the leftist attacks on Trump, but rather just the bulldog defensive responses by Trump when attacked eh ??

The attacks, so you say, on trump are based on facts and evidence. He is corrupt, he is a cheat, he is liar and he is has attacked everyone who doesn't kiss his fat ass.

He destroys people's lives, he's been divorced twice and his first wife accused him of rape; he has bribed two women he had affairs with, and attacked both of their characters, one of whom when his current wife was pregnant with his youngest son. He has been sued numerous times, declared bankruptcy in a way to have his debts absolved, causing workers whose labor for him was never paid.

Anyone who has access to the DSM 5 needs to read the definitions on Personality Disorders, Trump has at least one in each of the Three Clusters:

For those who are curious and not afraid to see the naked truth in trump's mental health, see:

How to Recognize a Personality Disorder

With any president, we can only deal with the present, and what they do in the job we hired them for. If have alternative reasons for getting rid of someone, then of course you do what the left is doing, and that is to attack a person on their entire life basically figuring that he's got to be guilty enough to cause him to be changed out because of something. So witch hunts and fishing expeditions are the order of the day in trying to unseat a sitting president. Not as easy as the left thought, so they just keep on making crazies of themselves in doing so. TDS is real.

BULLSHIT. You didn't open my link or even take a basic course in abnormal psychology. Trump is psychological unfit to have the power of the presidency. As Yogi said, you can look it up; I posted the link!

 

[Rye Catcher]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Trump, acquitted, forever. You might as well insist Hillary actually won, for all the good it does.

So you support corruption in the nation's legislature. I said that this "acquittal" exists on paper.
I wonder why you would support someone like trump if you think of yourself as a patriotic American.

Because Trump is more patriotic than any retarded demoncrap.

Sure old bone spurs is a patriot. I bet you aren't a vet too.

 

[Rye Catcher]

The fix was in, and publicly, before the Senate trial even started. The oath taken by each senator meant nothing. This "acquittal," while on paper, means absolutely nothing given the open misconduct of the republican senators.

Dimwinger Senators were on record with their decision before the trial, so why is it just misconduct by Republicans, Hack?

If they were really serious about it, they would be insisting the trial was rigged from the start because the democrat Senators running for president refused to recuse themselves, despite the obvious conflict of interest.

LOL, they took the oath as did the Republican Senators, and after the faux trial several R's acknowledged trump was guilty of what was claimed in the Articles of Impeachment, but they didn't reach the standard of a high crime or even a misdemeanor.

Who or what lost besides the Democrats? The Entire Congress which by at most 4% of the vote, put this president and every president to follow him above the law.

 

[Nostra]

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

The house did the best that they could under the circumstances, and the Senate did NOT.

Under what circumstances?

Obstruction, of an official investigation in to himself!

You mean challenging invalid subpoenas.

Apparently you aren't aware that the Congress and Executive are CO-EQUAL branches of govt. The WH doesn't have to jump every time Adumb Schifferbrains says to.

The Constitutional system we have is for disputes between the two to go to the Judicial for resolution. That isn't obstruction, Moron.

Phony baloney objections, blanket immunity of the entire white house staff crud are not legal objections.... judicial precedence already exists to cover it.

Well, since none of those moronic Dimsocialist talking points were used as a defense, your post is meaningless. They challenged the legality of the subpoenas on the grounds the entire House had not yet taken the required vote to initiate impeachment, therefore they were invalid.

Don’t let Schifferbrains tell you what to think. You end up looking as dumb as he is.