CNN Anchor Tells Nancy Pelosi That Trump Was Acquitted — She Interrupts, Claims He Wasn’t

[bravoactual]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.


Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Imeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

 

[Nostra]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.


Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Imeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

Total Exoneration sure triggered you..

 

[Rye Catcher]

Democrats presented their partisan case unobstructed.

No, they didn't. Not in the Senate. Why would you say they did?

13 witnesses, over 2800 pages of documents.

They still had no case.

TOTAL EXONERATION!

^^^ Diarrhea of the mouth ^^^, same old stink day after day. This arrogant jerk has nothing of substance to offer and echoes the usual RW Propaganda as if it is original.

Will Nostra ever figure out he(?) has no credibility?

 

[Nostra]

Democrats presented their partisan case unobstructed.

No, they didn't. Not in the Senate. Why would you say they did?

13 witnesses, over 2800 pages of documents.

They still had no case.

TOTAL EXONERATION!

^^^ Diarrhea of the mouth ^^^, same old stink day after day. This arrogant jerk has nothing of substance to offer and echoes the usual RW Propaganda as if it is original.

Will Nostra ever figure out he(?) has no credibility?

Facts always trigger Dimwinger window lickers.

 

[BS Filter]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.


Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Imeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

45 remains acquitted. You don't like it? Suck on it till you do.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Democrats presented their partisan case unobstructed.

No, they didn't. Not in the Senate. Why would you say they did?

13 witnesses, over 2800 pages of documents.

They still had no case.

TOTAL EXONERATION!

^^^ Diarrhea of the mouth ^^^, same old stink day after day. This arrogant jerk has nothing of substance to offer and echoes the usual RW Propaganda as if it is original.

Will Nostra ever figure out he(?) has no credibility?

Facts always trigger Dimwinger window lickers.

LOL: IDIOT-GRAM ^^^, Variety, Gibberish, i.e. unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense.

 

[hadit]

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

Are you saying that the House investigation was incomplete? Had the Senate called all the witnesses who testified to the House, asked them questions, then voted to acquit, would you have accepted the outcome, or are you in actuality demanding NEW witnesses?

Had the Senate called only new witnesses that put Joe Biden in a bad light, would you have accepted it, or are you in actuality demanding that only witnesses YOU approve of be called?

IOW, is it a sham only because you don't like the outcome? Final question, would you be complaining about the lack of witnesses had the Senate voted to convict? I predict you would have had absolutely no issue with that at all.

the trial was a SHAM because the lead Juror, Mitch McConnell, said he was NOT impartial as his Constitutional oath required, and said he was working with the Defendant's legal team hand in hand, to deliver a guaranteed acquittal by the Republicans in the Senate...

All the other things that were an absolute disgrace to justice, like not allowing new evidence that showed up after the indictment/after the Articles of impeachment, or new cooperative witnesses like Bolton, extend from Mitch's unconstitutional commitment to the Defense team and all of us in the public due to him saying this openly....that he would deliver an acquittal to the President... before the trial even began....and before the prosecutors and defense team, even presented their arguments..... made the trial a SHAM before it began.

Honestly, I know you and others would see it the same way I do, if this was a Democratic Majority leader of the Senate, saying this about a Democratic President being impeached, before the trial even began....

The democrats in the Senate that are running for president did not recuse themselves despite their obvious conflict of interest. Why did you ignore that?

 

[BS Filter]

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

Are you saying that the House investigation was incomplete? Had the Senate called all the witnesses who testified to the House, asked them questions, then voted to acquit, would you have accepted the outcome, or are you in actuality demanding NEW witnesses?

Had the Senate called only new witnesses that put Joe Biden in a bad light, would you have accepted it, or are you in actuality demanding that only witnesses YOU approve of be called?

IOW, is it a sham only because you don't like the outcome? Final question, would you be complaining about the lack of witnesses had the Senate voted to convict? I predict you would have had absolutely no issue with that at all.

the trial was a SHAM because the lead Juror, Mitch McConnell, said he was NOT impartial as his Constitutional oath required, and said he was working with the Defendant's legal team hand in hand, to deliver a guaranteed acquittal by the Republicans in the Senate...

All the other things that were an absolute disgrace to justice, like not allowing new evidence that showed up after the indictment/after the Articles of impeachment, or new cooperative witnesses like Bolton, extend from Mitch's unconstitutional commitment to the Defense team and all of us in the public due to him saying this openly....that he would deliver an acquittal to the President... before the trial even began....and before the prosecutors and defense team, even presented their arguments..... made the trial a SHAM before it began.

Honestly, I know you and others would see it the same way I do, if this was a Democratic Majority leader of the Senate, saying this about a Democratic President being impeached, before the trial even began....

The democrats in the Senate that are running for president did not recuse themselves despite their obvious conflict of interest. Why did you ignore that?

Democrats want everyone to believe that only Republicans play party politics. They're so disingenuous and hypocritical.

 

[bravoactual]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.

Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Impeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

Now I'm sure the dead from the neck Cons find it funny (NOT funny but true) but funny that 45 has been Impeached. The fact remains, stupidity of fuck wad dumb as pile of dried up dog turd GroppenFuhrer Followers, the fact remains he is now and forever more remains Impeached.

The Draft Dodging Piece of Shit 45 remains Impeached.

He was NOT EXONERATED.

He was NOT FOUND NOT GUILTY.

He will forever be IMPEACHED.

Fuck the Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitors who support the Fucking Traitor 45.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Democrat Insanity as it is so frequently demonstrated on US Message Board, such as the foul-mouthed, childish bravoactual.

 

[Nostra]

Democrats presented their partisan case unobstructed.

No, they didn't. Not in the Senate. Why would you say they did?

13 witnesses, over 2800 pages of documents.

They still had no case.

TOTAL EXONERATION!

^^^ Diarrhea of the mouth ^^^, same old stink day after day. This arrogant jerk has nothing of substance to offer and echoes the usual RW Propaganda as if it is original.

Will Nostra ever figure out he(?) has no credibility?

Facts always trigger Dimwinger window lickers.

LOL: IDIOT-GRAM ^^^, Variety, Gibberish, i.e. unintelligible or meaningless speech or writing; nonsense.

See....

 

[Nostra]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.

Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Impeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

Now I'm sure the dead from the neck Cons find it funny (NOT funny but true) but funny that 45 has been Impeached. The fact remains, stupidity of fuck wad dumb as pile of dried up dog turd GroppenFuhrer Followers, the fact remains he is now and forever more remains Impeached.

The Draft Dodging Piece of Shit 45 remains Impeached.

He was NOT EXONERATED.

He was NOT FOUND NOT GUILTY.

He will forever be IMPEACHED.

Fuck the Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitors who support the Fucking Traitor 45.

Forever EXONERATED, Trigger Boi.

 

[ChemEngineer]

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

Said the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and Nancy Pelosi presumes to overrule him?
What hubris these Leftists have. What infinite hubris.

Hillary outspent Trump 2 to 1 and the Crazies can't stand it, and claim all kinds of lies to try and hide their disgraceful loss.

 

[JusticeHammer]

LOL you damn retard. It is not the JOB of the JURY to call witnesses that is the defense and prosecutors job, you know the House and the defense lawyers. God you get stupider with every post.

you are partly mistaken....

yes the prosecution and defense request witnesses in an impeachment,

HOWEVER, Mitch's trial rules state that the Senators get to vote on if they will allow any witnesses at all, and if yes, then the senators get to vote on each and every witness called and whether to allow them to testify, and the rules did not permit any of the witnesses that testified during the house inquiry, to testify live, allowing the president's team to cross examine them....

The Trial was a complete SHAM, rgs, there's no way around it....

And yes, it is what it is.... he got his acquittal, come hell or high water.... and ya'll Cheer!!!
Winner, at all costs!!!

No matter the destruction of the rule of law, the destruction of our constitution, the destruction of equal branches of governmnt, with the destruction of the power of the House, the ONLY REPRESENTATION, ''We the People'' have in our govt.... which ultimately means... the destruction of all the founders believed in.... ''We are a Nation of Laws, not men...'' you all have seemed to have chosen the opposite of what they believed in,
and what we used to stand for...

This whole event, just gets added to the complete lawlessness and every day occurrences of the past 3 years, the whole thing is disheartening, and makes me realize, the USA really is not, what I imagined it was.... my entire life...

Look you RAGING LOON Take Clinton's Impeachment, 3 witnesses were called by the Senate, 3 . Why, because the Senators had questions about their testimony to the House. Be specific now and cite for me when all the witnesses were called by Clinton's defense team and all the prosecution witness by the House in the Clinton Impeachment.... I am about feed up with your abject IGNORANCE and LYING. The Senate does NOT TRY THE CASE they simply listen to the evidence presented by the House and the defense and render a verdict. GOD YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLUELESS it hurts.

Calm down RGS, allow yourself to be wrong every once in a while, it won't be the end of the world.... we all make mistakes.

as I have explained to you before, EVERY IMPEACHMENT IS DIFFERENT, based on the circumstances

Clinton had a special prosecutor, Kenneth Starr doing all of the official investigating and had a grand jury.

Andrew Johnson, had a full trial, as our founders intended imo and was tried, with 41 witnesses before the Senators, in full public view, and if the Senators had questions after the witnesses were questioned by both the prosecutor and cross examination by the defense, the Senators also asked their questions of the witnesses, in FULL public view.

Trump's trial was a sham, because it had neither.

None of that excuses the House for not doing their job. The Constitution says the House investigates impeachment, not the Senate.

13 witnesses and over 2800 documents submitted. You keep lying about no witnesses or evidence. It isn't working.

That lie won't fly, get a new one.

I can't decide if you are really as stupid as your many posts suggest, or that you are an agitator in training and still can't pass muster as a successful one. Of course I might be correct on both counts.

Committee hearings are not trials. Anyone who is not stupid or willingly obtuse knows this. And, BTW, your comment is nothing more than an echo of so many others, please don't pretend you had an original thought. I know you don't have that ability.

If he was stupid he would be a lib.

 

[JusticeHammer]

You got nothing but babbel in your rebuttal....What did somebody strike a nerve ? LOL.

We know who the anti-Americans are in this country, and it definitely ain't the Trump supporters.

"baggel"? The only nerve which struck me was attached to the funny bond. trump is not making america great, he has given Putin hegemony in the Middle East, Putin and Russia an advantage in their aggression in Ukraine and rearming offensive weapons, when the moron you support sabotaged the SALT protocols with his foolish rhetoric.

Please define who and what you believe are "un-Americans"?

Un-Americans are who they are, and they know who they are by the words that they speak.

LOL, you used a word, a perjorative at that, and can't define it. Typical of a tumpanzee. Want me to define that pejorative?

I'll be happy to:

Someone who continues to support the trump administration with a "see no evil" closed mind:

This is how I see you, and others who continue to support trump.

That's scary if you see me like that.

If you are supporting trump that is exactly how I see you!

You are blind so....

 

[JusticeHammer]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.


Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Imeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

And f#$-k you commie ass.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Democrats presented their partisan case unobstructed.

No, they didn't. Not in the Senate. Why would you say they did?

13 witnesses, over 2800 pages of documents.

They still had no case.

TOTAL EXONERATION!

^^^ Diarrhea of the mouth ^^^, same old stink day after day. This arrogant jerk has nothing of substance to offer and echoes the usual RW Propaganda as if it is original.

Will Nostra ever figure out he(?) has no credibility?

More credibility than of you retarded libs.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.

Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Impeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

Now I'm sure the dead from the neck Cons find it funny (NOT funny but true) but funny that 45 has been Impeached. The fact remains, stupidity of fuck wad dumb as pile of dried up dog turd GroppenFuhrer Followers, the fact remains he is now and forever more remains Impeached.

The Draft Dodging Piece of Shit 45 remains Impeached.

He was NOT EXONERATED.

He was NOT FOUND NOT GUILTY.

He will forever be IMPEACHED.

Fuck the Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitors who support the Fucking Traitor 45.

You're an idiot.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.

Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Impeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

Now I'm sure the dead from the neck Cons find it funny (NOT funny but true) but funny that 45 has been Impeached. The fact remains, stupidity of fuck wad dumb as pile of dried up dog turd GroppenFuhrer Followers, the fact remains he is now and forever more remains Impeached.

The Draft Dodging Piece of Shit 45 remains Impeached.

He was NOT EXONERATED.

He was NOT FOUND NOT GUILTY.

He will forever be IMPEACHED.

Fuck the Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitors who support the Fucking Traitor 45.

Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

Have a nice day, sucks to be you!

 

[berg80]

Trump broke Box Wine Nancy.



Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

45 remains Impeached.

Just like Andrew Johnson - Impeached.

Just like Bill Clinton - Impeached.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitor's Who Support The Fucking Traitor 45.

Now I'm sure the dead from the neck Cons find it funny (NOT funny but true) but funny that 45 has been Impeached. The fact remains, stupidity of fuck wad dumb as pile of dried up dog turd GroppenFuhrer Followers, the fact remains he is now and forever more remains Impeached.

The Draft Dodging Piece of Shit 45 remains Impeached.

He was NOT EXONERATED.

He was NOT FOUND NOT GUILTY.

He will forever be IMPEACHED.

Fuck the Fucking Traitor 45.

Fuck The Fucking Traitors who support the Fucking Traitor 45.

Chief Justice Roberts:

Chief Justice Roberts:

"It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the said Donald John Trump be, and he is
hereby, acquitted of the charges in said articles"

We already know all the Repub senators (except Mitt) ignored the overwhelming evidence of Trump's guilt. So what's your point?

We already know all the Repub senators (except Mitt) ignored the overwhelming evidence of Trump's guilt. So what's your point?