Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You still have not explained how prison culture has anything to do with same sex marriage in free society. It's just another false equivalency logical fallacy, not to mention a red herring intended to divert attention from the real issues here .I had asked to share more about your experience in the penitentiary but you seem reluctant. Why is that ?It refers to marriage in general and there is no reason to believe that gay marriage is different, no?
Gay Marriage is a new institution. When I was a young man, no one ever heard of it.
So? What’s your point exactly?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The point is that with little history behind it, no one knows what the results will be.
Gay Marriages have been conducted for many decades in the penitentiary system, and a lot people involved weren't pleased.
I haven't been in the pen myself, but I know a number of guys who have. There , BTW, are any number of gay guys in the joint looking for "wives". People who get sent to prison often have to fight for their manhoods. A guy like Roger Stone isn't going to have to worry, it took 50 G Men to take him down last week. He goes with a fearsome reputation.
Put another way, if sex was food you would weigh about 500lbs.
Let me tell you something princess. Some people push the envelope on sexuality and some do not. I am a straight guy married to a woman and my wife and I have hosted numerous group sex parties and attended many more . The sex was always safe, Promiscuity is not only a gay thing and it does not necessarily correlate with disease.The opposite would seem intuitive to me, when talking about the institution of Gay Marriage. Gay Marriage is a pretty extreme display of camp. Someone who has gone that far would seem to me to be more likely to push the envelope even further in many areas including sexuality.
Feel perfectly free to continue to believe that bovine excrement. Your ignorance, bigotry and inability to learn causes you to believe that gay people are unable to have healthy, happy long term relationships -yiour problem not mine. I almost feel sorry for you....not really.Let me tell you something princess. Some people push the envelope on sexuality and some do not. I am a straight guy married to a woman and my wife and I have hosted numerous group sex parties and attended many more . The sex was always safe, Promiscuity is not only a gay thing and it does not necessarily correlate with disease.The opposite would seem intuitive to me, when talking about the institution of Gay Marriage. Gay Marriage is a pretty extreme display of camp. Someone who has gone that far would seem to me to be more likely to push the envelope even further in many areas including sexuality.
Let me tell YOU something, Princess. The fact that you behave badly doesn't mean anything. It doesn't change the fact that homosexuals are far more likely to be promiscuous and unfaithful than heterosexuals. It doesn't change the fact that such behavior makes the odds of a successful marriage virtually nil. And it doesn't mean that throwing out the definition of marriage is no big deal.
Still think this guy won’t get DNC promotion?Put another way, if sex was food you would weigh about 500lbs.
And you would be starving to death.
So you think an aggressive, serial adulterer, married to a porn queen is a better choice?South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg entered the 2020 race for president on Wednesday, announcing his intentions with a video featuring scenes of him and his husband, Chasten, cooking and playing with their dog, Buddy.
Should Buttigieg win his long-shot bid for the Democratic nomination, he will become the first nominee of a major political party who publicly identifies as gay. If he goes on to defeat President Donald Trump, it'd be a historic win.
Read more at msn.com ...
These candidates pose a real problem for a party that has used race and gender warfare to attract constituents; in the end, they can only accommodate so many of those groups - and those omitted can be hard to placate.
Blacks could have delivered PA, WI, and MI to Hillary - and they didn’t. The party has learned, and I’m curious to see how they deal with the 2020 primaries. They already have white women, Hispanic men, a halfrican woman (Harris), and now a deviant mental case; real problems ahead as they try to keep the freak show together.
Yet more irrelevant excuses and tangents. Did he bring it up first? Yes. Are we talking about it because he brought it up first? Yes. Are we going to swallow your bullshit about "We say it, but you can't respond?" Piss off.
You didn’t watch the announcement video, that’s obvious. He never brought up being gay. A brief flash of him at home with his husband is all it showed. The video mentions him being a veteran, does not talk about him being gay.
"He didn't bring up being gay. He just showed himself with his husband. How can you call that "bringing it up" when I VERY CLEARLY am telling you I don't want it to be?"
It's pretty clear I watched it, and you're pissed that I didn't just listen to it. Maybe with a list of "thoughts to have approved by Seabiscuit" next to me.
Your ludicrous claim is that he made being gay central to his campaign. If you HAD watched the video, you couldn't make that claim. So you can try to lie, but its obvious you hadn't watched it when you made your silly initial claim.
"If you disagree with me, that just means you're STUPID!"
Amazingly enough, it's entirely possible for someone to see the exact same information you do, and to STILL DISAGREE WITH YOUR VIEWPOINT. Tell your friends; this is a game-changer!
You didn’t “disagree”, you made a ridiculous claim before watching the video. That’s obvious to anyone who actually watched the video.
You didn’t watch the announcement video, that’s obvious. He never brought up being gay. A brief flash of him at home with his husband is all it showed. The video mentions him being a veteran, does not talk about him being gay.
Yeah. So a man married to another man isn’t gay. I think it’s safe to presume he is.
Do you feel the same as mdk? Do you think he won’t get the DNC nod because he has a husband instead of a wife (is gay)? Seems otherwise like a good one to promote. Young but not too young. Heartland public servant (purple state votes). Nice face. Just needs DNC promotion like any of them would.
Yes or no on this guy?
Seawitch??
No. I don't believe he will get the nomination because he's a no name mayor from the middle of no where, not because he's gay.
South Bend is the 5th biggest city in all of Indiana, and is the home town of one of America's greatest universities. Hardly "nowhere".
Wow...the 5th biggest city in the 17th most populous state.
Obama allegedly had a gay prostitute from Chicago bumped off so he wouldn’t talk during his bid for president. Where’s the left’s outcry on that sexual impropriety? Answer: it’s ok if we do it and nobody can criticize us.So you think an aggressive, serial adulterer, married to a porn queen is a better choice?South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg entered the 2020 race for president on Wednesday, announcing his intentions with a video featuring scenes of him and his husband, Chasten, cooking and playing with their dog, Buddy.
Should Buttigieg win his long-shot bid for the Democratic nomination, he will become the first nominee of a major political party who publicly identifies as gay. If he goes on to defeat President Donald Trump, it'd be a historic win.
Read more at msn.com ...
These candidates pose a real problem for a party that has used race and gender warfare to attract constituents; in the end, they can only accommodate so many of those groups - and those omitted can be hard to placate.
Blacks could have delivered PA, WI, and MI to Hillary - and they didn’t. The party has learned, and I’m curious to see how they deal with the 2020 primaries. They already have white women, Hispanic men, a halfrican woman (Harris), and now a deviant mental case; real problems ahead as they try to keep the freak show together.
Would it shock you to know that it would depend on the policy positions? Is that just too outrageous a mindset for this day and age?
So a gay man is running for President? Not sure what his platform will be and I guess for most of you on the left and the right don't really care. You all seem caught up in who he sleeps with.
Pretty silly.
You didn’t watch the announcement video, that’s obvious. He never brought up being gay. A brief flash of him at home with his husband is all it showed. The video mentions him being a veteran, does not talk about him being gay.
"He didn't bring up being gay. He just showed himself with his husband. How can you call that "bringing it up" when I VERY CLEARLY am telling you I don't want it to be?"
It's pretty clear I watched it, and you're pissed that I didn't just listen to it. Maybe with a list of "thoughts to have approved by Seabiscuit" next to me.
Your ludicrous claim is that he made being gay central to his campaign. If you HAD watched the video, you couldn't make that claim. So you can try to lie, but its obvious you hadn't watched it when you made your silly initial claim.
"If you disagree with me, that just means you're STUPID!"
Amazingly enough, it's entirely possible for someone to see the exact same information you do, and to STILL DISAGREE WITH YOUR VIEWPOINT. Tell your friends; this is a game-changer!
You didn’t “disagree”, you made a ridiculous claim before watching the video. That’s obvious to anyone who actually watched the video.
I disagreed. You decided it had to be because I just didn't know enough to realize how "brilliant" you are. Sadly for you, THAT is NOT obvious to anyone but you.
"He didn't bring up being gay. He just showed himself with his husband. How can you call that "bringing it up" when I VERY CLEARLY am telling you I don't want it to be?"
It's pretty clear I watched it, and you're pissed that I didn't just listen to it. Maybe with a list of "thoughts to have approved by Seabiscuit" next to me.
Your ludicrous claim is that he made being gay central to his campaign. If you HAD watched the video, you couldn't make that claim. So you can try to lie, but its obvious you hadn't watched it when you made your silly initial claim.
"If you disagree with me, that just means you're STUPID!"
Amazingly enough, it's entirely possible for someone to see the exact same information you do, and to STILL DISAGREE WITH YOUR VIEWPOINT. Tell your friends; this is a game-changer!
You didn’t “disagree”, you made a ridiculous claim before watching the video. That’s obvious to anyone who actually watched the video.
I disagreed. You decided it had to be because I just didn't know enough to realize how "brilliant" you are. Sadly for you, THAT is NOT obvious to anyone but you.
It’s not because I’m brilliant that I realized you hadn’t watched his video before you commented. I watched his video, making it quite obvious you had not. Had you watched the video first, you would not have made the comment you did. I say this because I am perhaps giving you more credit than you deserve.
Your ludicrous claim is that he made being gay central to his campaign. If you HAD watched the video, you couldn't make that claim. So you can try to lie, but its obvious you hadn't watched it when you made your silly initial claim.
"If you disagree with me, that just means you're STUPID!"
Amazingly enough, it's entirely possible for someone to see the exact same information you do, and to STILL DISAGREE WITH YOUR VIEWPOINT. Tell your friends; this is a game-changer!
You didn’t “disagree”, you made a ridiculous claim before watching the video. That’s obvious to anyone who actually watched the video.
I disagreed. You decided it had to be because I just didn't know enough to realize how "brilliant" you are. Sadly for you, THAT is NOT obvious to anyone but you.
It’s not because I’m brilliant that I realized you hadn’t watched his video before you commented. I watched his video, making it quite obvious you had not. Had you watched the video first, you would not have made the comment you did. I say this because I am perhaps giving you more credit than you deserve.
Dear God, you're boring. Are you even aware of how utterly, teeth-achingly boring your endless, "I am sure I'm right, and i must have the last word no matter how trivial it is!" drivel actually is?
Not even worth it. You will believe whatever you want, even if God Almighty appeared before you and said, "Cecilie watched the video, and saw it differently than you. You're not automatically correct."
I'm going back to discussing something interesting, aka not you and your personal viewpoint on things which should be accepted as universal truth.
You seem to have a fear of gay folks. Is there something you feel the need to tell us?After reading his accomplishments it is more than clear that the only stage he belongs on is Rupaul's drag race.
A federal crime to protect only his fellow perverts. Really? A federal crime to protect boys against his kind is needed more.
He also believes in the hoax of global warming. Nope. He needs a knock out.
You seem to have a fear of gay folks. Is there something you feel the need to tell us?After reading his accomplishments it is more than clear that the only stage he belongs on is Rupaul's drag race.
A federal crime to protect only his fellow perverts. Really? A federal crime to protect boys against his kind is needed more.
He also believes in the hoax of global warming. Nope. He needs a knock out.
