protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 59,754
- 20,293
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #61
Their talk about "payback" is typical Muslim taqiyya, designed to enlist Western liberals to their side at least partially), and thereby strengthen their overall jihad. These gooneybirds are simply dereanged fanatics, who are carrying out the commands of the Koran, and what they think is their God. They've been doing it for 1400 years, and they darn well might be doing it 1400 years from now, in the future.Thanks, but it's nothing more than wishful thinking.Very well said..
Obviously this can't be done.
What would be nice is if:
That would be a nice start. Then we'd see where we were.
- There could be a much stronger, louder and more consistent backlash within Islam to condemn and isolate Jihadism
- The American PC Police would stop deflecting for and enabling Jihadism with their incredible "but the Crusades were bad too" crap
- The next American President (this one won't do it) strongly & clearly promoted assimilation, which Muslims worldwide refuse to do
- The next American President (this one won't do it) stopped leveraging Identity Politics to divide us and enable non-assimilation
- The American PC Police would stop leveraging Identity Politics to divide us and enable non-assimilation
.![]()
![]()
A member of the PC Police told me the latest attacks are "payback", and perhaps that's why they deflect for it. They want America to pay for its transgressions, and they're willing to enable the perpetrators.
.