Clime it or climate, who is winning?

Renewables cost too much and cant work.


As long as there are no subsidies, there is no reason to block things out of the future. Solar is extremely useful in undeveloped areas, including islands. But it isn't a "national" or an "AI" caliber source. It was really stupid to think it ever could be.
 
Yes, you have the ability to mindlessly repeat lies from MS Now.

congrats.


What you cannot do is answer even the most basic climate questions


Oh look, another uneducated slob who is relegated to shouting into the void on the internet, where he belongs.
 
Hydro works ... cheapest-in-the-nation electricity in the Pacific Northwest ... Bonneville Power forever ...

How expensive is your electricity? ...
Hydro can't provide enough power to run the nation.
 
Oh look, another uneducated slob who is relegated to shouting into the void on the internet, where he belongs.


If you can't answer even the most basic climate questions, why are you here?
 
fascism rules via fear Rob

~S~
Thank you. I have tried to break posters of saying fascist wrongly. I don't see a bit of this in Democrats or in Republicans. Fascists had a king along with a prime minister who was fired by the king then murdered by Italians.
 
There is a reason uneducated slobs are relegated to shouting into the void on nonscience message boards, and respected scientists are publishing research.
and yet every good reason for politicized science to be confronted on a political message board FF

~S~
 
Thank you. I have tried to break posters of saying fascist wrongly. I don't see a bit of this in Democrats or in Republicans. Fascists had a king along with a prime minister who was fired by the king then murdered by Italians.
The term is often used out of context Rob

~S~
 
I have been discussing climate for more than 30 years on forums.

2025. No hurricanes hit the USA. Weather colder than normal. Trump put end to Democrats plans to further rule our lives. They are cripples now. They have no leaders.

Here is what to discuss on this issue.



[td width="590px"]

[td]

Climate Facts Are Winning the Information Wars



[/td]



[/td]​



[td width="590px"]

[td]



[td]

[td]
ADKq_NavPxMA-Vc5Qq0PS3tppGoMZ-h_AD0g1b4PbHTpuqo6KhrxZIdX_APHkQBQSYxIGuowjBL5-9gre4Cw3aSmap_I6edD6PGmNtB60a1SJ4Z33Q=s0-d-e1-ft


[/td]


[/td]




For more than a decade, the CO2 Coalition has been the leading skeptical scientific organization advocating that policy be driven by true science, not political science. We remained optimistic that "the truth would win out" even in the face of well-orchestrated and well-funded censorship and misinformation.

Ours has been a David versus Goliath battle. However, we know that every once in a while David wins. That day appears to be close at hand. The battle is far from won, but every week brings new positive developments. Even Bill Gates has rejected climate alarmism. A recent New York Times article admitted that they and their allies in the Climate Industrial Complex are losing the information war. Two relevant quotes were the following:

1. "When nearly 200 nations signed the 2015 Paris agreement, acknowledging the threat of rising global temperatures and vowing action, many hoped that the era of climate denial was finally over. Ten years later it has roared back, arguably stronger than ever."

2. "As delegates wrapped the annual United Nations climate talks last Saturday, those who have campaigned to reduce the use of fossil fuels expressed growing alarm that forces arrayed against them are gaining ground in the information war."

The CO2 Coalition is stronger than ever and will work tirelessly to promote climate facts over climate fiction.

[/td]



[/td]​

Perhaps the climate religionists will be validated in some or all of their projections.

But so far they have not been right about a single thing they have pushed to control the people on Earth in the name of so-called climate change since the AGW mantra wasn't working for them.

When their models failed again and again and again, they just changed the 'doctrine' and moved the goal posts on down the road.

When they got caught fudging the data and numbers, they shrugged it off as immaterial.

Despite the trillions of dollars and draconian rules and regulations negatively affecting most aspects of our lives--some of these incomprehensible as effectively combating climate change--the climate control people cannot show ANY evidence that has reduced the CO2 or other so-called green house gasses by a single particle.

And they see no problem living their lives and conducting their 'climate control business' in a way that suggests they aren't the least worried about climate change.

They see no hypocrisy in demanding their 'science' be all that can be considered valid and anybody questioning or contradicting their science must be excluded, attacked, silenced, ruined.

All this is my evidence that those of us who remain in the "I don't know" or "it all isn't adding up" groups--we are called science deniers of course--look more and more like the smart, scientifically based people.

Those embracing the AGW/climate change doctrines/dogma/propaganda look more and more like the gullible and unscientific and/or politically motivated people.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps the climate religionists will be validated in some or all of their projections.

But so far they have not been right about a single thing they have pushed to control the people on Earth in the name of so-called climate change since the AGW mantra wasn't working for them.

When their models failed again and again and again, they just changed the 'doctrine' and moved the goal posts on down the road.

When they got caught fudging the data and numbers, they shrugged it off as immaterial.

And they see no problems living their lives and conducting their 'climate control business' in a way that suggests they aren't the least worried about climate change.

They see no hypocrisy in demanding their 'science' be all that can be considered valid and anybody questioning or contradicting their science must be excluded, attacked, silenced, ruined.

All this is my evidence that those of us who remain in the "I don't know" or "it all isn't adding up" groups--we are called science deniers of course--look more and more like the smart, scientifically based people.

Those embracing the AGW/climate change doctrines/dogma/propaganda look more and more like the gullible and unscientific people.
Obama put us into the Paris climate accords. Then he purchased two ocean front homes and lives in them. So much for he fears climate.
 
Yeah, me and the global scientific community.

Just not worthy of your consideration. Because you watched some YouTube videos.
You rely on the press. I do rely more on YouTube since it includes facts.
 
15th post
Obviously thatis idiotic and wrong, and it is you denier fools who get your information from your white wing noise media, instead of from scientists.
You have no black scientists on your side.
 
Back
Top Bottom