RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
Lets be honest, the science is limited. While it can and does predicted OBSERVED climate and projects it fairly accurately out several weeks the science is totally incapable of make realistic estimates out over any length of time.
The claims as to what will happen in years are wild guesses, the science has NO ability to make reasoned informed scientifically backed estimates.
There are so many unknowns that any estimate made without direct observation is no more than a guess.
The claims that computer models can predict future weather and temperature is patently false. The models are real good at predicting based on information provided, the problem is no one knows the right information.
Clouds, for example, play a crucial role in a lot of weather and even temperature levels and events. Yet no one can predict how or when clouds will form. The science knows what clouds are made of, but totally lacks any ability to determine why, when and what type of clouds will form. Except on observed data.
No one knows IF man is contributing to global warming, and if he is how much. Yet they plug in wild guess into the computers and come up with wishful thinking estimates based not on science but the whims and prejuidices of the team that programed the computer. Furthermore no one knows exactly what is supposed to be contributing to Global warming. One theory being CO2, but that is in doubt based on a check of historical levels of CO2 in the past and the temperatures known to exist then.
And then we have this....
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070510/ap_on_sc/hot_future
The claims as to what will happen in years are wild guesses, the science has NO ability to make reasoned informed scientifically backed estimates.
There are so many unknowns that any estimate made without direct observation is no more than a guess.
The claims that computer models can predict future weather and temperature is patently false. The models are real good at predicting based on information provided, the problem is no one knows the right information.
Clouds, for example, play a crucial role in a lot of weather and even temperature levels and events. Yet no one can predict how or when clouds will form. The science knows what clouds are made of, but totally lacks any ability to determine why, when and what type of clouds will form. Except on observed data.
No one knows IF man is contributing to global warming, and if he is how much. Yet they plug in wild guess into the computers and come up with wishful thinking estimates based not on science but the whims and prejuidices of the team that programed the computer. Furthermore no one knows exactly what is supposed to be contributing to Global warming. One theory being CO2, but that is in doubt based on a check of historical levels of CO2 in the past and the temperatures known to exist then.
And then we have this....
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070510/ap_on_sc/hot_future