What's your point? The claim here recently is that Steyer and others are unfairly spending their fortunes pushing climate "alarmism" - that far more money is being spent by the as-yet-unnamed interests who stand to get rich from reducing everyone's carbon footprint than has been spent by fossil fuel industry advocates spreading lies. Do you support that position?
Let's cut to the chase. Ian, what do you think of the work of the Heartland Institute?
Let's cut to the chase. Ian, what do you think of the work of the Heartland Institute?