Climate Alarmists are Meeeellllltttting.....melllllllttttttinnnnng

Good fucking god are you stupid.

In your linked video, we do not see or hear Al Gore nor is his name mentioned even once.

There is no date given for the comment about Florida being flooded.

There is not a single false, exaggerated or mistaken statement in the entire report.
Sea level rising? Nope
Florida underwater? Nope
CO2 warming the atmosphere? Nope
Al Gore in the video? Nope
 
Oh yeah?

View attachment 949777

All my doing. Said so yourself.


Who? The church?

I've been doing without the church for a long time.

Writing home? My parents are both long dead. To whom would I be writing?
The US lowered its output by switching to gas.

China dwarfed these reductions by building 2 to 3 NEW COAL PLANTS EACH AND EVERY WEEK
 
Lie

It's headed that way.

Lie.

YOU CLAIMED HE WAS. So, another lie.
I never claimed Gore was, I reposted a video.

It so happens that Gore is the patron Saint of the Cult of the USA CO2 molecule (China's CO2 has no effect, because it's on a per capita basis, er, or something. I'm sure the IPCC Covered this in a series of footnotes)
 
I never claimed Gore was, I reposted a video.
Unless you were to initially state that you knew it contained specific falsehoods, by posting that, you were stating that you agreed with it.
It so happens that Gore is the patron Saint of the Cult of the USA CO2 molecule (China's CO2 has no effect, because it's on a per capita basis, er, or something. I'm sure the IPCC Covered this in a series of footnotes)
He is not, but you are as stupid as stupid can get.
 
Unless you were to initially state that you knew it contained specific falsehoods, by posting that, you were stating that you agreed with it.

He is not, but you are as stupid as stupid can get.
Riiiight. But you’re the one who BELIEVES that 120ppm of additional CO2 can raise Earth temperatures by 1C
 
Me and about a hundred thousand PhD scientists.

Appeals to authority are not a valid, scientific argument.

A few hundred years ago, the same group was insisting that their models showed the Earth to be the stable center of the Universe suspended on the back of infinite turtles.

There's not one single repeatable lab experiment that replicates the imaginary "120PPM CO2 = 1C" Failed Theory
 
Appeals to authority are not a valid, scientific argument.
I'm afraid in the case where we are talking about a very strong consensus among the actual experts in THIS field, it is completely valid.
A few hundred years ago, the same group was insisting that their models showed the Earth to be the stable center of the Universe suspended on the back of infinite turtles.
The same group?
There's not one single repeatable lab experiment that replicates the imaginary "120PPM CO2 = 1C" Failed Theory
There's not a shred of evidence that you have the faintest idea how basic science actually works or that you are willing to accept ANY evidence refuting your idiotic beliefs.
 
What do you believe are the causes of sea level rise?
The Japanese earthquake in 2011, Japan's coastline dropped, in some places by more than 50cm. North East Japan moved 2.4m closer to North America. The Pacific plate slipped westward by 20m to 40m. The sea bed near the epicentre shifted 24m. The axis of earth moved between 10cm to 25cm, thus shortening the day by 1.8 milliseconds.

When they ran that through the "climate models" what effect on sea levels, climate etc.. did they conclude?
 
I don't know about climate change but I can tell you in Laughlin, Nevada later this week it will be 121 degrees. Arizona is too hot for me! :)
 
How critical do you think it is? Did Obama's beach house flood yet?

How about Miami? It's not underwater is it?

Has any property been lost to sea rise yet, cupcake?

Let's see all your examples of it happening, Captain Panic. :rolleyes-41:

He doesn't realize there was a 400-foot sea level rise just a few thousand years ago yet the world goes on and humans are all over the planet.
 

Monmouth explained, “Less than half (46 percent) of the American public sees climate change as a very serious problem.”

And this is what you get when you keep crying wolf over and over and over and over.

And your fundamental message, which really may have merit, is lost.

Way to go guys.

And you can send a big thank you to Al Gore.

If you had focused on stewardship instead of shutting down oil and coal....you might have gotten more sympathy.

Breath that CO2....you earned it.
Yeah, don’t you worry your pussy.

https://apple.news/Ad3gWh4xXTQGTZZrtOg5aLQ
 
Nice try but power plants shifting to NG and the rapid demise of our industrial base was the cause of the sulfur reductions.
Sorry Charlie.

In that regard it was FGD;

Flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) is a set of technologies used to remove sulfur dioxide (SO2) from exhaust flue gases of fossil-fuel power plants, and from the emissions of other sulfur oxide emitting processes such as waste incineration, petroleum refineries, cement and lime kilns.
...
.......
My last employment prior to retirement was for a firm that manufactured major components for such systems.
 
Also Crick , what were the results on the climate models when the scientists ran isostatic rebound and the albedo effect mechanism through them. To what levels did they conclude,rise or fall, did those two processes contribute.

You know fine well there are hundreds of processes that drives sea rise/fall and the climate, but all we hear off alarmists is, "Just man made co2 for climate, and just melting ice for sea rise". So if you conclude it's those, what were the results from all the processes for you to arrive at that conclusion? Detail would be good, statements are not.
 
I'm afraid in the case where we are talking about a very strong consensus among the actual experts in THIS field, it is completely valid.

The same group?

There's not a shred of evidence that you have the faintest idea how basic science actually works or that you are willing to accept ANY evidence refuting your idiotic beliefs.
It’s not personal, Crick

I was skeptical the first time I heard 120PPM of CO2 over 125 years can raise temperature. Why not show an experiment controlling for that one variable?

It’s 3 decades now and there’s 0 lab work
 

Forum List

Back
Top