Climate Alarmists are Meeeellllltttting.....melllllllttttttinnnnng

It’s not personal, Crick
Not in that sense but it is absolutely your personal obsession.
I was skeptical the first time I heard 120PPM of CO2 over 125 years can raise temperature.
Based on what? You lack the education to even find applicable research must less evaluate it.
Why not show an experiment controlling for that one variable?
High schools perform such experiments by the thousands.
It’s 3 decades now and there’s 0 lab work
Wrong.
 
Not in that sense but it is absolutely your personal obsession.

Based on what? You lack the education to even find applicable research must less evaluate it.

High schools perform such experiments by the thousands.

Wrong.
Is any of that proof? Can posters verify those statements? Why turn down a legitimate request to give out proof?
 
Not in that sense but it is absolutely your personal obsession.

Based on what? You lack the education to even find applicable research must less evaluate it.

High schools perform such experiments by the thousands.

Wrong.

As always thank you for your keen, on point insight which 100% always fails to answer the very basic question
 
Last edited:
That's nice, Cap'n Salty. :itsok:
Here is the thing about evolution and it's a huge problem. The claim being all things began with the ancestor of all being a one cell. Where is proof the one cell produced all of life?

Abiogenesis is the killer for Darwin.
 
Whether global warming is true or false is a mute point. It has had no effect on business nor the economy. What big industry wants is to lessen clean air and clean water standards. They don't care if they hurt people or not.
 
Whether global warming is true or false is a mute [sic, you meant "moot"] point. It has had no effect on business nor the economy. What big industry wants is to lessen clean air and clean water standards. They don't care if they hurt people or not.
Global warming has most assuredly had effects on business and the economy and those effects will be growing enormously as the problem worsens. Think of the cost of moving a few hundred million people and the businesses that employ them.
 
Global warming has most assuredly had effects on business and the economy and those effects will be growing enormously as the problem worsens. Think of the cost of moving a few hundred million people and the businesses that employ them.
When will this crap happen?
 
It's already happening and will continue to get worse, more so as long as people keep rejecting mainstream science without a shred of justification.
Excellent science needs no salesmen or women.
 
Excellent science needs no salesmen or women.
Robert, science has discovered hundreds, probably thousands of things that were harmful to humans that we knew nothing about. Aside from all that medical science has done for us, science has found the harmful effects of lead, asbestos, freon, organic halogens (DDT), PFAS, cyanide, arsenic, chlorine, nitrous oxide, phosgene. Do you think it was wrong for word of such discoveries to have been spread?
 
Robert, science has discovered hundreds, probably thousands of things that were harmful to humans that we knew nothing about. Aside from all that medical science has done for us, science has found the harmful effects of lead, asbestos, freon, organic halogens (DDT), PFAS, cyanide, arsenic, chlorine, nitrous oxide, phosgene. Do you think it was wrong for word of such discoveries to have been spread?
Climate science. Yeah, that's nice. However, to think insignificant man has much control, or affects the

weather of the earth to a measurable degree is the epitome of ignorance, stupidity, and arrogance.

There was nothing wrong with freon, idiot. Dupont came up with a proprietary refrigerant and bribed the

government to make everybody use their shit. That's fascism, brah.

Oh! And the media ran with that shit, too. "ZOMG, holes in the ozone!" :aargh:

In the end, it was all about monopoly and dollars for the DuPonts.

If anything punched holes in the ozone, it was a HAARP weapon sponsored by the US government.
 
Last edited:
Climate science. Yeah, that's nice. However, to think insignificant man has much control, or affects the

weather of the earth to a measurable degree is the epitome of ignorance, stupidity, and arrogance.
No, it isn't. It's what the science clearly and unambiguously states.
There was nothing wrong with freon, idiot. Dupont came up with a proprietary refrigerant and bribed the

government to make everybody use their shit.

That's fascism, brah.

Oh! And the media ran with that shit, too. "ZOMG, holes in the ozone!"

In the end, it was all about monopoly and dollars for the DuPonts.

If anything punched holes in the ozone, it was a HAARP weapon sponsored by the US government.
I never realized you were that far over the edge.
 
No, it isn't. It's what the science clearly and unambiguously states.

I never realized you were that far over the edge.
You're a moron, and there never was a "hole in the ozone" so everybody had to switch from R12

To Du Pont's proprietary bullshit, that doesn't even work as good, and it's been done over and over

like a ******* dozen times since, then. Maybe not a dozen, but at least half.
 
You're a moron, and there never was a "hole in the ozone" so everybody had to switch from R12
You believe it was a hoax intended solely to help DuPont Chemical? The Monteal Protocol, phasing out the use of Freon, was signed by 197 countries. Do you actually believe the governments of 197 countries would conspire in a hoax just to enrich DuPont Chemical? Sorry dude, but that just does not pass the sanity test.
To Du Pont's proprietary bullshit, that doesn't even work as good, and it's been done over and over

like a ******* dozen times since, then.
What's been done over and over again?
Maybe not a dozen, but at least half.
What the **** is that supposed to mean?
 
15th post

You believe it was a hoax intended solely to help DuPont Chemical? The Monteal Protocol, phasing out the use of Freon, was signed by 197 countries. Do you actually believe the governments of 197 countries would conspire in a hoax just to enrich DuPont Chemical? Sorry dude, but that just does not pass the sanity test.​


What's been done over and over again?

What the **** is that supposed to mean?
You're a ******* retard is what it means.

I was wrong about 6, it's been 4 or 5.

Well, pasting excerpts doesn't work from there, but hole in the ozone was discovered in 1926, before CFCs

and freon. It was just used as an excuse to crack down on cheap things to push more expensive proprietary products. :rolleyes-41:

 
Last edited:
You're a ******* retard is what it means.

I was wrong about 6, it's been 4 or 5.

Well, pasting excerpts doesn't work from there, but hole in the ozone was discovered in 1926, before CFCs

and freon. It was just used as an excuse to crack down on cheap things to push more expensive proprietary products. :rolleyes-41:

4 or 5 WHAT?

And you continue to claim that the governments of 197 countries signed the Montreal Protocol just to make some money for DuPont Chemical? It still fails the sanity test and you haven't addressed that.

1720105014024.png
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom