Maybe you should learn Mandarin and move in with your Chinese Masters?
Before the door hits your fat ass, tell us how Bain "reorganized and refocused" GS Steel by putting up very little of their own money, borrowing the rest, and then paying themselves back with borrowed money while levering the company up to $500 million in debt and throwing thousands of workers into the unemployment lines with pensions that required taxpayer support.
Ask the Chinese Money Guy for your next talking points, Polly.
Bain invested PLENTY into the venture. You're full of crap about the $500Mill in debt. When this company was acquired it faced ACUTE competition with ANCIENT facilities. It wasn't gonna make it without borrowing money for updating the plant. $100 mill in facilities upgrade isn't expensive for a steel plant. WITHOUT borrowing that money -- it should have just shut the doors..
40 Steel companies FAILED in that same period. And the actual decision to end the operation was made to AVOID DRAGGING a very successful sister operation down with it.
THOSE FOLKS have a successful steel operation today --- AND their jobs. THEY are happy that Bain ended the budget-busting cyst on their asses.
(I can't remember the name of the surviving GS Ind operation)
You make a lousy critic for these difficult decisions. Because you would have most definately just crapped your pants and sucked your thumb faced with any of those facts and pressures.
"In its 2001 bankruptcy filing, GS Industries listed total debts of $554 million.
‘Closed the Kansas City plant’
"Along with the bankruptcy filing came the announcement that GS Industries was shutting down the Kansas City mill.
"Some 750 employees were put out of work.
"In a news release, the company said the bankruptcy was triggered in part by '
the critical need to restructure the company's liabilities.'
"How much of that was RomneyÂ’s fault...
That part's debatable; however, what isn't debatable is the tens of millions of dollars in dividends that Bain Partners "earned" from borrowed funds.
From PolitiFact:
"Our ruling
"ObamaÂ’s ad, and the news release announcing it, packed a lot of claims about RomneyÂ’s tenure at Bain Capital and how it handled its investment in a Kansas City steel mill.
"
We are checking this claim: 'After purchasing the company, Mitt Romney and his partners loaded it with debt, closed the Kansas City plant and walked away with a healthy profit, leaving hundreds of employees out of work with their pensions in jeopardy.'
"We found, through corporate filings, interviews and investigations by other news organizations, that the statement is accurate but needs some clarification. First, itÂ’s true that Bain added significantly to GSTÂ’s debt load while paying dividends to itself.
"
The plantÂ’s closure, however, happened after Romney had left daily operations at Bain, though he led Bain during six years of its majority investment in the plant. And other, outside factors were at work, making the steel industry a tough business. Steel prices were low and electricity costs were high, and those forces drove other steel mills out of business around the same time.
"The statementÂ’s last two claims are solid: Bain (and Romney) made a profit from taking over GST, and the employees lost many benefits their union had negotiated, including supplemental pension payments.
The federal government had to step in to shore up the fund.
"We rate the claim Mostly True."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/may/16/barack-obama/obama-ad-claims-romney-bain-left-misery-wa