OK
And of course you ignored the part of my post where I stated the Court should have strict ethical rules. Your partisan hackery shining through.
No they don't because you are still ignoring the million dollar prize Ginsberg was awarded to attack the Black Conservative.
Because the Supreme Court does not have the same ethics code that the rest of the Government has and doesn't follow.
Are you on drugs? Or are you off your meds?
Why not?
How am I ignoring it you dozy fucker. ?
No you only mentioned Conservatives, specifically the Black one.
They should kick her off the court
Clarence Thomas is being rewarded for his hard work.
That indeed is comical that Tommy boy thinks the guardian is a credible source,they are as credible as the msm media..
"The Guardian"
.
I don’t - just FYI.
They don’t care.You do know that other USSC Justices did the same Ginsberg was one of those ? The Justices don't have the same ethics rules as the rest of the Government. This isn't an ethics issue it's just the same problem you loons have always had. The Black man ain't acting the way you expect him to.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Mysterious $1 Million Prize
When the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg accepted a $1 million prize from a liberal billionaire’s foundation, she pledged to pass the money to a list of designated charities. Four years later, it is unclear where Ginsburg sent that money—an ambiguity that experts say raises...freebeacon.com
You mean within the confines of ethics, the rest of the judges in the US are restricted to?
Really?
NOT being a deceiving crook?
Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Mysterious $1 Million Prize
When the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg accepted a $1 million prize from a liberal billionaire’s foundation, she pledged to pass the money to a list of designated charities. Four years later, it is unclear where Ginsburg sent that money—an ambiguity that experts say raises...
And SBB joining in the lynch mob.
Liberals, not leftists.
Translation:
^ Brilliant.
