They Said Biden Wouldn’t Come for Our Guns.
The Plan Says Otherwise.
In 2022, Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell wrote a piece in Newsweek titled, “President Biden Does Not Want to Take Your Guns Away.” He accused Republicans of
floppingaces.net
17 Apr 2025 ~~ By Curt
In 2022, Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell wrote a piece in
Newsweek titled,
“President Biden Does Not Want to Take Your Guns Away.” He accused Republicans of spreading fear. “No one is coming for your guns,” he wrote. “We respect the Second Amendment,” he added. He made it sound like the debate was over.
But in 2025, a declassified document proved Swalwell was wrong—and possibly knew it.
On April 16, 2025, then-Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified the
Strategic Implementation Plan for Countering Domestic Terrorism.
This multi-agency plan had been quietly signed and put into motion by the Biden administration back in
June 2021. The contents are alarming. This wasn’t just a strategy to stop violence. It was a roadmap for using federal agencies, public health systems, tech companies, and education programs to track, flag, and isolate what they defined as “domestic threats.”
They didn’t need to say the word “gun ban.” They just rewrote the definitions, rewired the bureaucracy, and laid the foundation to restrict your right to own one.
~Snip~
Bureaucracy Is the Weapon
Let’s talk about how they planned to do it. The strategy is subtle but powerful:
- Red Flag Expansion
The plan urges states to adopt and expand “Extreme Risk Protection Orders.” These let the government take someone’s guns away based on a report from a friend, relative, or even a therapist. You don’t need to be charged. You don’t need to be convicted. Just flagged. The feds also offer grants and technical support to help states get it done faster.
- Mental Health as a Surveillance Tool
Agencies like HHS, DOJ, and the VA are tasked with creating training programs for doctors, social workers, and school staff. These programs teach professionals how to identify people who might pose a risk—again, not because they broke a law, but because they showed “warning signs.” You can guess what some of those signs are: isolation, political anger, and interest in gun rights.
- Digital Literacy Means Narrative Control
The plan calls for funding “digital literacy” programs to help students and communities identify “extremist content” online. That might sound helpful until you realize it means the federal government will decide what speech is acceptable. Pro-2A content, conspiracy discussions, even satire—any of it could get swept into this net.
- Watchlists for Domestic Cases
One of the most chilling parts: the plan calls for expanding databases like TIDE and the Terrorist Screening Database to include domestic cases—even when there’s no foreign connection. These databases are used by law enforcement, employers, and even TSA. Imagine winding up on one because of your Facebook post or your group membership.
“We’re Just Trying to Keep You Safe”
The plan doesn’t propose repealing the Second Amendment. It doesn’t call for door-to-door confiscation. That’s the point. This isn’t an open assault—it’s a quiet chokehold.
They focus on prevention, which sounds good. But prevention means action
before a crime. And to do that, the system needs a list. A watchlist. A database. A profile. That’s how you get flagged as a “risk” just for buying the wrong rifle or sharing the wrong meme.
The government doesn’t need to take your gun if it can:
- Flag you as a potential threat.
- Revoke your license
- The government doesn’t need to take your gun if it can:
- Freeze your purchase
- Suspend your carry permit.
- Get a judge to sign off on a red-flag seizure.
~Snip~
What Could Have Happened
If Biden had won re-election in 2024, this plan would be in full effect right now. The structure was already built. Every pillar—information sharing, pre-crime prevention, law enforcement coordination, and cultural re-education—was mapped out.
You’d have seen:
- More red flag cases with less evidence
- Doctors and therapists quietly reporting patients
- Students flagged for edgy opinions
- Gun owners tracked without charges
- Social media content monitored, suppressed and reported
And all of it runs through agencies that don’t need a warrant or a jury to act.
Bottom Line
This wasn’t a theory. It was a plan. Signed, implemented, and nearly buried—Donald Trump won the Presidency and Tulsi Gabbard made it public.
Gun rights aren’t just threatened by laws. They’re threatened by systems. When the government redefines law-abiding Americans as potential threats, they don’t need to ban anything. They just need to “protect” you hard enough.
Swalwell said no one was coming for your guns. The Biden administration wrote a 50-page manual showing exactly how they would. They just hoped you wouldn’t notice.
Commentary:
The far-left Neo-Marxist Democrat Globalist gun grabbers are going to find the road to gun confiscation a little tougher after today’s fiasco in Florida. Gun Grabber Mark Kelly is going to have to drag Gabby out and start parading her in front of the Neo- Commies again.
Trump should turn it around and use it against them to round up all the Leftist terrorists running amok.
The democrat plan has always been to disarm the public. I am old enough to remember these lies we have been told since 1962.
We have been told lies for decades by "Democrats".
Promises made by Democrats Thomas J. Dodd and Emanuel Celler in 1962...
1962 We ONLY want to register handguns. Rifles will not be affected!
1964, We ONLY want to register ALL firearms, not ban them.
1968 We ONLY want to register all guns, and ban the import of foreign Saturday Night Specials, and 5-shot bolt action army surplus rifles! (they got the ban).
1970, We ONLY want to ban small American handguns. Rifles will not be affected! 1976 We ONLY want to ban ALL handguns! Rifles will not be affected!
1981, Actress Lee Grant on Good Morning America (ABC) screams...”THE NRA IS A RIFLE ORGANIZATION! THEY SHOULD GIVE UP THEIR HANDGUNS AND THEY CAN KEEP THEIR RIFLES!”
1984, they made a grab for the rifles that is still going on today.
1989 George Bus sr. bans import of “assault rifles”
1994 Clinton “bans” Assault rifles for ten years.
2004 calls for a ban on single shot .50 cal rifles.
2023 Biden: “We are going to ban assault rifles!”
If they can get any sort of a ban and make it stick, they will then use that to go after their original target, HANDGUNS. They are never satisfied.
1988, Josh Sugarmann, of the National Council to Ban Handguns tells how to ban rifles.
“Assault weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons
—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun— can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on
these weapons.” – Josh Sugarmann
From 1976. -- Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.(Now the Brady Center)
“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest. Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.
So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in the United States — is going to take time.
My estimate is from seven to ten years. The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — TOTALLY ILLEGAL.”
-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58
“Yes, I’m for an outright ban [on handguns].”(Now rifles added)
-Pete Shields, Chairman emeritus, Handgun Control, Inc., 60 Minutes interview
HCI, around 1984, suddenly made a grab for the semi-auto rifles and shotguns, and missed But they showed their hand. As a result all gun owners know we are always up against a stacked deck.
Gun owners now know that any time we negotiate with those who want to ban guns, we are up against a stacked deck.
NEVER trust a Democrat. My grandfather (may he RIP) told me never to trust an Arab. They're deceitful and thieves. I use the same caution he imbued in me with Democrats..
