Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 69,699
- 50,393
- 3,565
Looting is not protected by the ConstitutionProtesting is a right, right there in the first amendment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looting is not protected by the ConstitutionProtesting is a right, right there in the first amendment.
Protesting is. What tRump did to the protesters in the park today was a clear cut first amendment violation.Looting is not protected by the ConstitutionProtesting is a right, right there in the first amendment.
Again, the looting and violence that accompanies the protests is not protected speechProtesting is. What tRump did to the protesters in the park today was a clear cut first amendment violation.Looting is not protected by the ConstitutionProtesting is a right, right there in the first amendment.
You constitutionalists should be up in arms.
The fact that you aren't says volumes about your dedication to American values.
In any CIVILIZED NORMAL State the law allows protection of property as well as life. NO ONE has the right to destroy someone elses livelihood or their property.A man has the right to protect his property and his life and his family.People have a right to protect them and theirs, sweetie.When they start shooting people, they become police, judge and jury.
Welcome lawlessness to fight lawlessness.
What could go wrong?
If you start shooting unarmed people it gets dicey.
I'm pro-law enforcement. Not vigilantism
They don't violate that then they will not get shot........if they ignore it......OH WELL.
Play taps.
Life and family sure.
Property is something else.
It’s set for DC tonight
About 50 now have committed to line target areas and offer protection that law enforcement, mayor and governors won’t provide because they are too busy arresting church attendees
The lawless farce is ovet and property will be provided some protection even if poluce won’t do it .
RIOTING is NOT a right, burning killing destroying is NOT protected by the Constitution, never has been.Protesting is a right, right there in the first amendment.If they shoot protesters they are heroes.Vigilantism is every bit as illegal as looting.Large groups of looters are gathering at Fashion Island and South Coast plaza waiting for nightfall to attack. The National Guard has been called with a two hour notice. My neighbors are suited up.LOL, redneck? I grew up in southern California and spent most of the last decade in Germany.STFU, redneck.LOL, because Creepy says so. GTFOThis is NOT what the second amendment is for.What could POSSIBLY go wrong here?
This is exactly what we have a Second Amendment for and they will hardly be the first ones to do this. I've seen several examples of business owners and others guarding their properties with rifles. In every instance they were spared the carnage and not a single shot was fired.
There is a CVS in Rancho Santa Margarita that is surrounded by looters armed with rocks, bricks and metal bars. Citizens have grabbed their weapons and are on the way.
San Pedro has put out a community alert that carloads of looters are driving around looking for any business to destroy.
If they start shooting they are murderers and should be treated as such.
Really?
Protesting is legal.
Riots are not.
When they start shooting people, they become police, judge and jury.
Welcome lawlessness to fight lawlessness.
What could go wrong?
Antifa Nazis get shot?What could POSSIBLY go wrong here?
What wrong with that?
How can you prevent someone from doing that which they were never going to do anyway?"Volunteers" will be preventing the cops from doing their jobs.
No, spineless politicians prevent the police from doing their jobs. Time to shoot and cuff.If the cops are not allowed to do their jobs, volunteers will do it for them.When they start shooting people, they become police, judge and jury.
Welcome lawlessness to fight lawlessness.
What could go wrong?
We were stupid to listen to liberals blather about excessive force in the face of organized rioting.
"Volunteers" will be preventing the cops from doing their jobs.
That's why we have them.Guns change the picture.
Maybe put it in the Constitution even.What could POSSIBLY go wrong here?
This is exactly what we have a Second Amendment for and they will hardly be the first ones to do this. I've seen several examples of business owners and others guarding their properties with rifles. In every instance they were spared the carnage and not a single shot was fired.
Turns out firearms are a pretty good deterrent from crime. We should make a law.
I have noticedActually...looters are reprehensible (and they come in all colors, or did you know that?).
we would hope that intergration would improve the behavior of black people
But instead it is lowering the standards of whites
In any CIVILIZED NORMAL State the law allows protection of property as well as life. NO ONE has the right to destroy someone elses livelihood or their property.A man has the right to protect his property and his life and his family.People have a right to protect them and theirs, sweetie.When they start shooting people, they become police, judge and jury.
Welcome lawlessness to fight lawlessness.
What could go wrong?
If you start shooting unarmed people it gets dicey.
I'm pro-law enforcement. Not vigilantism
They don't violate that then they will not get shot........if they ignore it......OH WELL.
Play taps.
Life and family sure.
Property is something else.
The Sheriff of Polk County, Fl has given the go ahead for all homeowners with weapons to defend their homes. And they do own their guns there. If the Prog Socialists come in to rob, start a fire, assault or anything... The Sheriff said..."Blow them away"!True rightwing idiocy.
But if you value property over life...well...that's kind of warped.
To libtard 'thinking', guilt and innocence are GROUP qualities, not individual properties.View attachment 344117No evidence that Floyd death based on race. Just criminal conduct by a bunch of losers.
You are thus innocent or guilty, not based on what you do, but what group you fall into.
This is why Libtards are fundamentally unable to govern during times of crisis like this.
They si
Why don't you share that video? Or admit it's yesterday's news?It’s set for DC tonight
About 50 now have committed to line target areas and offer protection that law enforcement, mayor and governors won’t provide because they are too busy arresting church attendees
The lawless farce is ovet and property will be provided some protection even if poluce won’t do it .
I just watched live video of terrorists in DC attacking and permanently damaging, trying to permanently destroy, more national monuments. So much for Trump's promise to stop it. He need only order the Secretary of the Army to put a stop to it but he's not. If there was a different Republican right now, I'd vote for him.
Headed down
Quiet for a while and then hope you see me on TV
Protecting your own property and family isn’t “vigilantism”, it’s a God given right.
Well, the internet Rambos are all aflutter. I just hope this doesn't go south.