- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,026
- 47,214
- 2,180
"The closest?" What an utterly meaningless bullshit term.Well Trump is the closest any American president has been with a Russian leader. Still maybe Trump is just trying to buy Russia?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"The closest?" What an utterly meaningless bullshit term.Well Trump is the closest any American president has been with a Russian leader. Still maybe Trump is just trying to buy Russia?
You cannot demonstrate any of this nonsense to be true.Today's Republican Party wants a white ruled nation where white people get first crack at everything, and anyone who isn't born into wealth is subservient to those who were. And while they're at it, let's exclude as many non-whites as possible from those opportunities.
Making up stuff that can't possibley be proven is her specialty.You cannot demonstrate any of this nonsense to be true.
Under FDR, the US went socialist with the Government controlling critical industries and supplies.Communism didn't exist when Washington was alive. What FDR built was not in any way communistic
Clearly.Making up stuff that can't possibley be proven is her specialty.
Under FDR, the US went socialist with the Government controlling critical industries and supplies.
The Government told you what you could make, who you could hire, wages and what profit you could make
Helped win WWII
No they don't. That's dumb.Communism didn't exist when Washington was alive. What FDR built was not in any way communistic.
The USA declared independence from the class systems of Europe to build a land where all people are created equal, and they rise or fall on their own merits, not on the class they were born into.
Today's Republican Party wants a white ruled nation where white people get first crack at everything, and anyone who isn't born into wealth is subservient to those who were. And while they're at it, let's exclude as many non-whites as possible from those opportunities.
No it didn't.Under FDR, the US went socialist with the Government controlling critical industries and supplies.
The Government told you what you could make, who you could hire, wages and what profit you could make
Helped win WWII
They absolutely do not care if Russia or any other nation interfere, as long as their nominee won. Apparently, in their minds, if a democrat wins, it's the right outcome and interference doesn't matter. A Republican winning, however, is proof that there was some kind of cheating involved and it must be rooted out so it never happens again.I have no doubt that Russia and other countries “interfered” or engaged in tactics to at least influence the 2016 and other Elections. Are Democrats naive enough to believe that countries didn’t do the same in ‘20 and won’t do the same in future Elections?
Simply allowing the price mechanism to function would have worked better than rationing. One thing all socialists love is giving government power to tell us what we can have and cannot have.It was a different world.
"During the Second World War, Americans were asked to make sacrifices in many ways. Rationing was not only one of those ways, but it was a way Americans contributed to the war effort."
"When the United States declared war after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States government created a system of rationing, limiting the amount of certain goods that a person could purchase. Supplies such as gasoline, butter, sugar and canned milk were rationed because they needed to be diverted to the war effort. War also disrupted trade, limiting the availability of some goods. For example, the Japanese Imperial Army controlled the Dutch East Indies (today’s Indonesia) from March 1942 to September 1945, creating a shortage of rubber that affected American production.
On August 28, 1941, President Roosevelt’s Executive Order 8875 created the Office of Price Administration (OPA). The OPA’s main responsibility was to place a ceiling on prices of most goods, and to limit consumption by rationing."
The US became the “Arsenal of Democracy “ under FDRNo it didn't.
So now all we need is another democrat to push us into a war so the government can again take control of everything, this time without letting go afterward. Maybe there's a reason TRUMP! was hated so much by democrats, being a peace president and all that.Under FDR, the US went socialist with the Government controlling critical industries and supplies.
The Government told you what you could make, who you could hire, wages and what profit you could make
Helped win WWII
We were the richest and most powerful because the rest of the first world nations were decimated by the war. We were the only ones left standing with a functioning manufacturing base.FDR pulled us out of the goddamn Depression and got us through the biggest war we ever fought. He also ushered in the Era of America with this country being the richest and most powerful on the planet.
Fuck off troll
I did! I pay attention to these things, really enjoy reading about it.Did anyone hear a peep from the blamemainstreet media about Russia! hacking or interfering? I didn't, not a peep.
Simply allowing the price mechanism to function would have worked better than rationing. One thing all socialists love is giving government power to tell us what we can have and cannot have.
The US became the “Arsenal of Democracy “ under FDR
He saved the world
Yet we went from the sky is falling to not a peep. You'd think that some enterprising cub reporter out to make a name for himself would have followed up on the biggest panic story from the last election with more breathless proclamations, interviews with people who crafted the means to keep Russians from buying FaceBook ads (which as we now know is the single biggest influencer when it comes to electing American presidents), but nothing. It is impossible to believe they would have been silent had TRUMP! pulled out a victory. We'd have had another multi-year, multi-million dollar investigation into how it could have happened, woe is us, etc.I did! I pay attention to these things, really enjoy reading about it.
We were caught off guard in 2016. Despite what people claim, Russian interference in the election is not normal. Media was not ready to combat Russian trolls. The DNC was woefully unprotected.
Social media platforms had developed rather sophisticated methods to remove Russian troll accounts. Russia did attempt to create fake news sites and build a following on social media but it was also identified by the FBI and banned from social media which basically shut it down. These sites really just failed to gain traction.
What was most successful was the Russians pushing the Biden-Ukraine corruption story, primarily through friends in the Ukrainian government.
What WAS surprising was how they did it and how successful they were at it. Of course you tards buying into it the way you did and amplifying their agitprop was a big part of that so....As for it not being normal, there is nothing unsurprising that they attempted to influence the election.
No, Russian interference in our election was not normal. No amount of saying so would change that. They had not done anything like this in modern history.Yet we went from the sky is falling to not a peep. You'd think that some enterprising cub reporter out to make a name for himself would have followed up on the biggest panic story from the last election with more breathless proclamations, interviews with people who crafted the means to keep Russians from buying FaceBook ads (which as we now know is the single biggest influencer when it comes to electing American presidents), but nothing. It is impossible to believe they would have been silent had TRUMP! pulled out a victory. We'd have had another multi-year, multi-million dollar investigation into how it could have happened, woe is us, etc.
As for it not being normal, there is nothing unsurprising that they attempted to influence the election. We're the big dog on the block, OF COURSE every nation in the world would do whatever it could to influence our election in ways that would favor them. Heck, we do it ourselves, only we don't wait for elections, we use bombs and bullets.
What WAS surprising was how they did it and how successful they were at it. Of course you tards buying into it the way you did and amplifying their agitprop was a big part of that so....