Bullypulpit said:
Being able to stand outside and look in to provide some guidance does not constitute hypocrisy.
Ahhhh...Secret knowledge...the last refuge of the the intellectually bankrupt.
"Provide some guidance".........There's the key to this diatribe.
"My profound eccentricity(possible intellectual pride) allows me to add comment in any area of I choose.
I've been trying to put my finger on it, but the last quote revealed what's going on. " I have a handle on all of mankind's problems. Even Christianity, because I'm so unbiased, that I can see both side of the story without tainting my expression with on drop of favoritism.".
Pride in oneself can be healthy, and also can be very unhealthy. It's like self-love. Our Creator wants us to appreciate, and love ourselves, but in a way that exudes graciousness toward the one in whom we received all thing ultimately. Unfortunately, the self-love that exudes from secularistic humanism places man's mind, creativity, and self destiny, all in his/her's own hands. As a result, self-love defined this way creates millions of little "mini-gods", or self-deluded human beings.
Delusion meaning; I don't need any outside wisdom other than my biologically given "stuff" that was endowed upon me as a result of "happen-chance" selection from millions of years of Molecular "craps" in primordial soup.
Since the beginning of the great Enlightenment, man has realized that the God has been his stumbling block to attaining his full potential. His potential? To be master and captain of his own destiny......No longer chained-down by fairy-tails, phophecies, and Alchemistic subjectivity.
Just look how man has progressed since the injection of Voltairism.
I think that George Orwell's, "1984", might be more of a reality in the future, as man gradually wins the battle of "total dominence" in respect to everything.
......
In my opinion, this is a spiritual battle......as I believe that human beings are spiritual creatures with a soul(mind, will, and emotions), and at the helm of this soul is a "throne" of sorts.......Who is enthroned at the helm of a man's soul? Himself or his Creator. Does this Creator force Himself upon this throne? I don't think so. It appears that scripture succinctly reveals that man does have the responsibility of abdicating his throne to whomever or whatever he chooses.
In essence, secular man is actually as spiritual as Christian man, but the similarity ends there. Secular man is his own Lord/god and is firmly seated on the throne/helm of his soul by his choice. Christian man, has abdicated his prior state of control/dominance to another; namely the Lord Jesus Christ as succinctly defined in the bible.
Yes, it is a spiritually defined difference, and or battle at times.
.......
........
This is all tongue-in-cheek folks......I hope.
........