Arm waving doesn’t count.Done that for the entire group. I see no point in addressing each one. Is there even one that appears in every gospel?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Arm waving doesn’t count.Done that for the entire group. I see no point in addressing each one. Is there even one that appears in every gospel?
Walk me through a miracle performed by Christ and let’s find out together.I think we agree the OT contains embellishments. Can you admit the NT does too?
Ignorance.Some did, some didn't. Why would that have been?
That’s a pretty dumb way to identify a conspiracy. But using your flawed logic that can only mean the accounts of Jesus must be true.If it was a conspiracy you'd think every miracle would be in every gospel.
That all depends on if you believe the account was total fiction and had no basis in historical fact. Because if that’s what you believe then your only option is to believe it was a conspiracy.Was there a 'conspiracy' in the Exodus story?
Because the historical event was Jesus performing miracles. So if you deny that then there is no basis in historical fact and you must believe it was a conspiracy.Why were the miracles of Jesus any different?
That’s because the argument you are making can’t be made. But more importantly you can’t make any distinction whatsoever unless you go through the details of the specific accounts.I see no point in addressing each one.
No lie, see here. Sorry if the answer was too simple for you to comprehend.No. You haven’t. You are lying.
All of your questions will be answered when you explain the historical event, what was embellished and why it was embellished.
You may believe the resurrection and miracles were historical events but I do not. You've give me your evidence and I've given you mine and neither of us were persuaded.Yes, the historicity of who Jesus is is the point of the accounts. Which is why these accounts stand apart from OT accounts. What you are calling embellishments are the historical events.
I have yet to see you go through the details of the specific accounts. Don't ask me to do your homework. Feel free to pick an example.That’s because the argument you are making can’t be made. But more importantly you can’t make any distinction whatsoever unless you go through the details of the specific accounts.
I've done the required work, that is why I believe what I believe.It’s frustrating having a discussion with someone who is unwilling to put in the required work to arrive at objective truth because the required work would result in having to accept something they don’t want to accept.
Neither do deflections.Arm waving doesn’t count.
After you. You make the claim they are real. Pick the best example.Walk me through a miracle performed by Christ and let’s find out together.
What was the event in Matthew 8:1-4? And what was the embellishment?No lie, see here. Sorry if the answer was too simple for you to comprehend.
Event: Jesus preached
Embellishment: He was special and had the power to do miracles
Event: Jesus was crucified
Embellishment: He was resurrected from the dead
I do believe that because that's what the evidence shows. You've never performed an extensive study. I have. That's why you can't discuss the details of any of the miracles performed by Jesus and explain what was and wasn't being embellished and why it was being embellished?You may believe the resurrection and miracles were historical events but I do not. You've give me your evidence and I've given you mine and neither of us were persuaded.
The birth narratives do not depict historical events so I wouldn't even call them embellishments.
Sure I have. The Tower of Babel is the allegorical account of the migration away from the cradle of civilization - Mesopotamia. That is the historical event. The elements are same language, same region to different languages and different regions. The narrative of why the account was embellished (i.e. God was angered and scattered the people) is debatable. It's not covenant related. It could be obedience related. As in they were trying to find another way to heaven other than the way that God had already determined. Or it could simply be that they were describing God intended for diversity.I have yet to see you go through the details of the specific accounts. Don't ask me to do your homework. Feel free to pick an example.
No. You haven't.I've done the required work, that is why I believe what I believe.
Again... you have to go through the details of each miracle and explain what was and wasn't being embellished and why it was being embellished.Neither do deflections.
I've looked at all of the new testament accounts of miracles performed by Christ. I can't make an argument for embellishment for any of them. Because the miracles are the historical events. These accounts are not like the OT accounts. I can understand how and why those accounts were embellished. I can't for the NT accounts of the miracles performed by Christ.After you. You make the claim they are real. Pick the best example.
Event: Jesus came down from the mountain to preachWhat was the event in Matthew 8:1-4? And what was the embellishment?
"When Jesus came down from the mountain, great crowds followed him. And then a leper approached, did him homage, and said, “Lord, if you wish, you can make me clean.” He stretched out his hand, touched him, and said, “I will do it. Be made clean.” His leprosy was cleansed immediately. Then Jesus said to him, “See that you tell no one, but go show yourself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses prescribed; that will be proof for them.”
ALL OF THE MIRACLES ARE EMBELLISHMENTS. NONE OF THEM EVER HAPPENED. Can I be more clear?I do believe that because that's what the evidence shows. You've never performed an extensive study. I have. That's why you can't discuss the details of any of the miracles performed by Jesus and explain what was and wasn't being embellished and why it was being embellished?
Where did it say Jesus came down to preach? It doesn't.Event: Jesus came down from the mountain to preach
Embellishment: He healed a leper
Except you can't explain what was and wasn't being embellished and why it was being embellished for any of them.ALL OF THE MIRACLES ARE EMBELLISHMENTS. NONE OF THEM EVER HAPPENED. Can I be more clear?