As usual, Alex Pareene has a sharp bead on it:
Counterpoint: No, Chris MatthewsÂ’ Obama interview doesnÂ’t matter
Today, basic cable chat show host Chris Matthews interviewed President Barack Obama. The interview will air this evening at 7 p.m. The president may say some interesting or newsworthy thing, but it is extremely likely that whatever airs tonight will be largely forgotten in a few months. Maybe even a few days. In nearly five years in office, all most people remember of President ObamaÂ’s various television interviews is the time he killed an insect.
In short, this interview doesn’t matter. It might be interesting — though it’d be more interesting if Obama were sitting down with tougher, smarter MSNBC personalities, like Rachel Maddow, Melissa Harris-Perry, Chris Hayes or Steve Kornacki — and something the president says may end up serving as a bit of “Morning Joe” fodder for a few days, but this interview will not cause a shift in policy, change Congress, or even much affect the president’s approval ratings.
How to write about it, then, if you are the media reporter for a political media organization? You could say, as I just did, that while it might be interesting television, itÂ’s really fairly insignificant. The problem with that is, once you begin talking like that it suddenly seems not particularly worth it to talk about almost
anything that happens in national politics, as most of the things that happen on any given day, as a glance at Mike AllenÂ’s Playbook can confirm, are pretty meaningless in the grand scheme. There is also another way to write about it. You could also claim, or try to convince the reader (or yourself), that a basic cable chat show host interviewing the president is
massively important. This is what Politico’s Dylan Byers chose to do. His headline is, “Why Chris Matthews’ Obama interview matters,” and here is how he begins his argument:
For almost a decade now, Chris Matthews has served as a barometer for baby-boom progressives’ attitude toward Barack Obama — from the “thrill” that went up his leg when he heard the presidential candidate speak in 2008 to the utter disappointment following last October’s debate in Denver.
ThatÂ’s why MatthewsÂ’ interview with Obama, which takes place at 2 p.m. today and airs at 7 p.m. on MSNBC, is a crucial one for the President, and for MSNBC.
Sorry, no. Chris Matthews has served as a barometer solely of Chris Matthews, media figure (and, admittedly, an often delightful on-air presence). His politics have been inconsistent, shifting according to the mood at his channel. His main motivation has always been ensuring that Chris Matthews is on television and taken seriously. He represents, perhaps, in some small way, the intersection of the elite media and the progressive media — his debate freakout combined the Beltway obsession with the ephemeral and stylistic with a sort of progressive tendency to be operatically disappointed in the president — but that makes him even more of a sui generis figure. Not very many people in the country are remotely like Chris Matthews.
More at the link.