danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #21
...darn. I only recently came across videos of Fox News women in short skirts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I dropped them 2 years ago it was obvious. Where you been?It's pretty sad when Fox News isn't considered right wing enough anymore
Newsmax went from an average of 100k viewers per night to OVER ONE MILLION.
Yeah, the lefts death grip on information is crumbling.
Oh these rubes,
"Ratings" are not any kind of "grip on information", shortpants. They're a count of the number of eyeballs watching that can be sold to an advertiser. And that's the grand sum total of all they are. They have absolutely ZERO to do with any kind of content.
Friggin' fake wrestling gets "ratings". Friggin' onstage paternity tests get "ratings". Friggin' naked people left on an island to eat bugs gets "ratings". Do ANY of those hold any kind of "grip on information"?
No Bubbles, the grip on information is held by Corporate interests. And their goal is to sell you shit you don't need, and to get you to watch long enough they will put literally ANYTHING on the air, whether it's real information, fake information or hapless naked people walking around on an island as if they have nothing even though there's a full camera crew right in front of them. It's visual fast food for the Gulibles. And by the way fake information sells WAY better than real information.
Fer fux sake use your head.
No, THIS is whats sad.It's pretty sad when Fox News isn't considered right wing enough anymore
That was the moment I turned off Fox and unsubbed
But that is not true is it? My point was valid & backed by facts.Lol..your post just proved my point.Conspiracy theories like Russian collusion? Didn't that turn out to be a smokescreen for HRCs serious email crimes?Fox is no longer not conspiratorial enough. Ailes knew conservatives love conspiracies. So does Newsmax and OAN. Fox, at least its news division, sees the danger that these conspiracy theories pose to the Republic. However , Newsmax and OAN do not. It is about the Benjamins. Expect more conspiracy theories. Expect them to be more bizarre and more dangerous. There is nothing so outrageous that Conservatives will not believable.It's pretty sad when Fox News isn't considered right wing enough anymore
Or the one about Ukrainian quid pro when it was all Quid Pro Joe?
Yeah, we're the ones hooked on conspiracy theories. Only ours have facts to back them up
Try “scary”.It's pretty sad when Fox News isn't considered right wing enough anymore
You know thinking back it was probably closer to 4 than 2 for me. I remember that election crap.I dropped them 2 years ago it was obvious. Where you been?It's pretty sad when Fox News isn't considered right wing enough anymore
I dropped them 4 years ago when they tried to tell me who to vote for in 16.
Did you see Chris Wallace when he was giddy as a school boy saying "This is just a MAGICAL NIGHT for America!" Geez Looeez I think he was yanking his Toobin.Hard to tell Fox News from MSNBC anymore and Wallace wow what a communist infiltrator he turned out to be.
Newsmax went from an average of 100k viewers per night to OVER ONE MILLION.
Yeah, the lefts death grip on information is crumbling.
It's pretty sad when Fox News isn't considered right wing enough anymore
Try “scary”.It's pretty sad when Fox News isn't considered right wing enough anymore
Disagree...
I like when they marginalize themselves. "Shopping for news" though is probably a bigger problem than Newsmax specifically. I rely on a few of sources; NPR and AP and CNN. For deep dives, I'll hit The Atlantic or Slate or NPR itself.
Newsmax went from an average of 100k viewers per night to OVER ONE MILLION.
Yeah, the lefts death grip on information is crumbling.
Newsmax went from an average of 100k viewers per night to OVER ONE MILLION.
Yeah, the lefts death grip on information is crumbling.
Oh these rubes,
"Ratings" are not any kind of "grip on information", shortpants. They're a count of the number of eyeballs watching that can be sold to an advertiser. And that's the grand sum total of all they are. They have absolutely ZERO to do with any kind of content.
Friggin' fake wrestling gets "ratings". Friggin' onstage paternity tests get "ratings". Friggin' naked people left on an island to eat bugs gets "ratings". Do ANY of those hold any kind of "grip on information"?
No Bubbles, the grip on information is held by Corporate interests. And their goal is to sell you shit you don't need, and to get you to watch long enough they will put literally ANYTHING on the air, whether it's real information, fake information or hapless naked people walking around on an island as if they have nothing even though there's a full camera crew right in front of them. It's visual fast food for the Gulibles. And by the way fake information sells WAY better than real information.
Fer fux sake use your head.
Today's "FOX" is tomorrow's "Newsmax".
Newsmax went from an average of 100k viewers per night to OVER ONE MILLION.
Yeah, the lefts death grip on information is crumbling.
Fox News changed? Well their business model dictates that. The Trump era is history and the other cockroaches are scrambling for viewers.
Try “scary”.It's pretty sad when Fox News isn't considered right wing enough anymore
Disagree...
I like when they marginalize themselves. "Shopping for news" though is probably a bigger problem than Newsmax specifically. I rely on a few of sources; NPR and AP and CNN. For deep dives, I'll hit The Atlantic or Slate or NPR itself.
The Atlantic is outstanding. Because it digs deep into the backstories and angles of every kind of topic.
It's interesting that that's our values, while for the Foxnoids and Newsmax Hax it's all about "what slant the talking heads have". It's entirely PERSONAL rather than intellectual. It's like a swarm of cultists looking for a cult to glom onto that can sing them to sleep.
Of course that was always what Murdoch designed it for, and they ate it up.
Newsmax went from an average of 100k viewers per night to OVER ONE MILLION.
Yeah, the lefts death grip on information is crumbling.
Fox News changed? Well their business model dictates that. The Trump era is history and the other cockroaches are scrambling for viewers.
Business model is profits ya moron. It's what drives all for profit businesses. So tell me, how is losing millions of your viewers profitable?
Newsmax went from an average of 100k viewers per night to OVER ONE MILLION.
Yeah, the lefts death grip on information is crumbling.
Oh these rubes,
"Ratings" are not any kind of "grip on information", shortpants. They're a count of the number of eyeballs watching that can be sold to an advertiser. And that's the grand sum total of all they are. They have absolutely ZERO to do with any kind of content.
Friggin' fake wrestling gets "ratings". Friggin' onstage paternity tests get "ratings". Friggin' naked people left on an island to eat bugs gets "ratings". Do ANY of those hold any kind of "grip on information"?
No Bubbles, the grip on information is held by Corporate interests. And their goal is to sell you shit you don't need, and to get you to watch long enough they will put literally ANYTHING on the air, whether it's real information, fake information or hapless naked people walking around on an island as if they have nothing even though there's a full camera crew right in front of them. It's visual fast food for the Gulibles. And by the way fake information sells WAY better than real information.
Fer fux sake use your head.
Today's "FOX" is tomorrow's "Newsmax".
The Trumpsters are like junkies needing their fixes. Their main dealer cut them off at the knees.
Newsmax went from an average of 100k viewers per night to OVER ONE MILLION.
Yeah, the lefts death grip on information is crumbling.
Fox News changed? Well their business model dictates that. The Trump era is history and the other cockroaches are scrambling for viewers.
Business model is profits ya moron. It's what drives all for profit businesses. So tell me, how is losing millions of your viewers profitable?