CDZ Charity is a failure of government - Discuss

The poor can't afford computer programs designed to take the money of the average Joe.

Every poor person in America has a smartphone and every library has free WiFi.

View attachment 406897

Every poor person does not and the programs the big investors use are not available for free. It's why I support a tax on trades.


And just like that, you make sure the middle class can't retire comfortably, or ever move UP the social economic ladder.

The middle class make few trades and a very small percent on a trade would not affect them at all.
 
We spend billions on expensive military toys that don't work

They seem to work just fine ...

471289cde2490c80f60d5e85bcdfb6da.gif
 
The poor can't afford computer programs designed to take the money of the average Joe.

Every poor person in America has a smartphone and every library has free WiFi.

View attachment 406897

Every poor person does not and the programs the big investors use are not available for free. It's why I support a tax on trades.


And just like that, you make sure the middle class can't retire comfortably, or ever move UP the social economic ladder.

The middle class make few trades and a very small percent on a trade would not affect them at all.


The middle class is massively invested in mutual funds. Increased fees can greatly reduce growth.

I looked at it back when I was shopping around. I went with a fund with low fees. I forget the exact numbers, but you are talking small gains over time, small increases in fees can have tremendous impact when they are hitting constantly over a working career.


You do NOT want to mess with one of the few viable ways for the middle class or working poor to build real wealth, not if you have ANY concern for the well being of people.


Seriously, you need to play with a retirement calculator and just move the percentage growth down a point or two, to reflect your tax on trades.
 
Welfare has dignity
:abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::abgg2q.jpg::woohoo::woohoo::no_text11:
It isnt where anyone wants to be but it is a lot more dignified than a handout. If you pay in you have a right to take out.
The issue that you guys cant get your heads round is that it is not "free". Most folk pay in. You focus on a minority who game the system. Well that will always happen but it is a small price to pay for having a compassionate and civilised society.
 

In this story the tory minister is praising the efforts of foodbanks in helping folk to not starve.

But we pay taxes to live in a society where people are not going to starve. People should not be at the mercy of charity to put some food on the table.

Everybody pays taxes so they have a right to expect help when they go through bad times. Welfare has a dignity that charity has not got. It is time to move on from Victorian era social policy.
you don't want to pay the taxes that will do what you want because you'll have nothing left after.

But like most people you probably want other people to pay higher taxes so you can get what you want without paying more yourself.
 

In this story the tory minister is praising the efforts of foodbanks in helping folk to not starve.

But we pay taxes to live in a society where people are not going to starve. People should not be at the mercy of charity to put some food on the table.

Everybody pays taxes so they have a right to expect help when they go through bad times. Welfare has a dignity that charity has not got. It is time to move on from Victorian era social policy.
you don't want to pay the taxes that will do what you want because you'll have nothing left after.

But like most people you probably want other people to pay higher taxes so you can get what you want without paying more yourself.
Taxation should be fair to all. Currently it isnt fair. There is something fundamentally wrong in a system where trump pays less tax than the girl who cleans his gold toilet every morning.
 
The poor can't afford computer programs designed to take the money of the average Joe.

Every poor person in America has a smartphone and every library has free WiFi.

View attachment 406897

Every poor person does not and the programs the big investors use are not available for free. It's why I support a tax on trades.


And just like that, you make sure the middle class can't retire comfortably, or ever move UP the social economic ladder.

The middle class make few trades and a very small percent on a trade would not affect them at all.


The middle class is massively invested in mutual funds. Increased fees can greatly reduce growth.

I looked at it back when I was shopping around. I went with a fund with low fees. I forget the exact numbers, but you are talking small gains over time, small increases in fees can have tremendous impact when they are hitting constantly over a working career.


You do NOT want to mess with one of the few viable ways for the middle class or working poor to build real wealth, not if you have ANY concern for the well being of people.


Seriously, you need to play with a retirement calculator and just move the percentage growth down a point or two, to reflect your tax on trades.

You simply refuse to be honest.


Dude, I'm deadly serious. YOu do not want to mess with Mutual Funds. You could screw up tens of millions of lives. If not more.
 

In this story the tory minister is praising the efforts of foodbanks in helping folk to not starve.

But we pay taxes to live in a society where people are not going to starve. People should not be at the mercy of charity to put some food on the table.

Everybody pays taxes so they have a right to expect help when they go through bad times. Welfare has a dignity that charity has not got. It is time to move on from Victorian era social policy.
you don't want to pay the taxes that will do what you want because you'll have nothing left after.

But like most people you probably want other people to pay higher taxes so you can get what you want without paying more yourself.
Taxation should be fair to all. Currently it isnt fair. There is something fundamentally wrong in a system where trump pays less tax than the girl who cleans his gold toilet every morning.

You have no idea what other people pay in taxes.

And life isn't fair and never will be. Only the naive and the retarded think it is.

and the only fair taxation is a flat tax where everyone pays the exact same rate but you don't want that either
 

In this story the tory minister is praising the efforts of foodbanks in helping folk to not starve.

But we pay taxes to live in a society where people are not going to starve. People should not be at the mercy of charity to put some food on the table.

Everybody pays taxes so they have a right to expect help when they go through bad times. Welfare has a dignity that charity has not got. It is time to move on from Victorian era social policy.
you don't want to pay the taxes that will do what you want because you'll have nothing left after.

But like most people you probably want other people to pay higher taxes so you can get what you want without paying more yourself.
Taxation should be fair to all. Currently it isnt fair. There is something fundamentally wrong in a system where trump pays less tax than the girl who cleans his gold toilet every morning.

You have no idea what other people pay in taxes.

And life isn't fair and never will be. Only the naive and the retarded think it is.

and the only fair taxation is a flat tax where everyone pays the exact same rate but you don't want that either
You seem unwilling to debate the issue.
 

In this story the tory minister is praising the efforts of foodbanks in helping folk to not starve.

But we pay taxes to live in a society where people are not going to starve. People should not be at the mercy of charity to put some food on the table.

Everybody pays taxes so they have a right to expect help when they go through bad times. Welfare has a dignity that charity has not got. It is time to move on from Victorian era social policy.
you don't want to pay the taxes that will do what you want because you'll have nothing left after.

But like most people you probably want other people to pay higher taxes so you can get what you want without paying more yourself.
Taxation should be fair to all. Currently it isnt fair. There is something fundamentally wrong in a system where trump pays less tax than the girl who cleans his gold toilet every morning.

You have no idea what other people pay in taxes.

And life isn't fair and never will be. Only the naive and the retarded think it is.

and the only fair taxation is a flat tax where everyone pays the exact same rate but you don't want that either

When one person gets millions from the government and the other gets enough to eat, the one who gets millions indeed should pay more in taxes.
 
Here is a fact, the more money you have the less you can relate to those who have less. People who have the most money run everything. Makes striving for equality a non starter.
 
I support someone that might actually do what the Democrats pretend they want to do. The wealth gap grew to record proportions under Obama. The stock market did great while the poor fell further behind.

Not true. Most people I know where in much better shape in 2016 than they were in 2009. They are in worse shape now.

"Too big to fail" was institutionalized under Obama. You want empty rhetoric,

No, I live in the real world. the one where like it or not, big corporations are crucial to our economy. We are having a conversation because one big corporation made computers and other corporations let us hook up to the internet.
56% percent of those polled say they are better off now than in 2016.

https://content.gallup.com/origin/g...duction/Cms/TGBCMS/hobqwcnhcuohd8gvv29fjq.png
 
The government is incompetent, and never does anything well or even adequately.......they have no investment in doing things well....no matter how badly they do things, the bureaucrats always have their jobs, the tax money keeps coming in and no one holds them accountable for their screw ups........that is the the problem with those who support bigger and bigger government...they can't see that simple truth.

No, the problem is that we tend to see poverty as a moral failing, rather than an economic one.

You're poor? Well, it must because you have bad morals.... not because you are the victim of 400 years of racism or that we have criminal levels of wealth inequality.

We spend billions on expensive military toys that don't work, and a pittance on keeping our poor from starving... just enough to keep them from rioting and ... OH shit, they're rioting!!!

Welfare has no dignity the government takes money at gun point, and gives it to people who did not earn it, and losing much of the money to waste, fraud and abuse with a tiny amount actually making it to those who need it........C

What, are you actually saying the government is taking money from you at Gunpoint, and despite your personal arsenal, you let them do it? What about those Second Amendment Solutions you keep talking about?

Charity is people, on their own, helping other people, giving freely of their own time and money, without the threat of violence to take the money from some, to give it to others, and it actually is far more efficient and less wasteful of resources since the people who give the money are doing it freely, and target the money to those who actually need it....... you don't understand that which is why you think the way you do.....

Actually, charities are even more inefficient than the government.



-- The 50 worst charities in America devote less than 4% of donations raised to direct cash aid. Some charities gave even less. Over a decade, one diabetes charity raised nearly $14 million and gave about $10,000 to patients. Six spent no cash at all on their cause.
-- Even as they plead for financial support, operators at many of the 50 worst charities have lied to donors about where their money goes, taken multiple salaries, secretly paid themselves consulting fees or arranged fund-raising contracts with friends. One cancer charity paid a company owned by the president's son nearly $18 million over eight years to solicit funds. A medical charity paid its biggest research grant to its president's own for-profit company.


And those charities lose their donations.......government keeps raking in the tax dollars no matter how much waste, fraud and theft they allow to happen. There are also legal remedies for charities that waste their donations.....meanwhile, the bureaucrats simply keep moving on.........
 
In a welfare state, most will pay in indefinitely and some will be entitled indefinitely.

When being supported by others goes from being charity to an entitlement, there ceases to be any impetus to restrict it to the times when we are struggling.

Charity has always come with strings. If you pray the right prayers, we feed you. Attend our meetings and we feed you.

Entitlements, by definition, come with no strings.

You have a point there.

So you have "welfare" for poor people, and they are looked down upon if they get Medicaid, Section 8, Food Stamps or TANF. Those lazy welfare people. Oh, wait, they have jobs that only pay minimum wage. Well, those lazy welfare people not getting good jobs.

Meanwhile, you have middle class entitlements like Social Security, Medicare, Veteran's Benefits and Unemployment Insurance, which goes to mostly middle class white people. It can also be abused in various ways... and are. But we are fine with that because we've "earned" it.


The government takes money out of your earnings to pay for the crappy social security return that they give you...you aren't helping your case... Veterans give time out of their lives in service for their benefits....and they get crappy healthcare from the government.....you aren't helping your case....
 

Forum List

Back
Top