M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
Read the indictment.
Case Against Former FBI Director James Comey Dismissed
- Thread starter skews13
- Start date
Why don't you tell me in your own words. I know what's in the indictment I'm just not sure you are. After you do I'll explain exactly why this case falls apart on merit on top of a shitload of procedural errors to the point that I'd be surprised if sanctions weren't to follow.
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
Because the indictment answers your question, in full.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,219
- 124,536
- 3,645
Yeah, it's a hilarious lie. Was going nowhere anyway.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,219
- 124,536
- 3,645
Oops, you forgot to name the regulation the judge violated.
Funny, the judge had no problem describing the laws Trump violated.
It's almost as if you are reflexively vomiting a talking point that was spoonfed to you.
If one is a fan of KGB types like yourself.
candycorn
Diamond Member
1srelluc
Diamond Member
I bet those billed hours are mounting up.....Once the Clinton judge is slapped down or the cretins are recharged the billing will continue. 
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,219
- 124,536
- 3,645
Yes, ending a case completely always racks up the billing hours.I bet those billed hours are mounting up.....Once the Clinton judge is slapped down or the cretins are recharged the billing will continue.
Ok then I'll play.
“authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports.
Richman was not at the FBI when he was an anonymous source. And neither can you establish that Comey authorized anything.
So, no lie and you can't establish that Comey did anything.
In fact, as I pointed out in the other post the evidence was so weak that one count was rejected and 2 others were passed with only 14 of the 23 voting to indict, (if they did so at all, which is contested) this on the probable cause standard which is just legal speak for saying that a crime might have been committed when Halligan was the only one there to present the case. No judge, no defense. And even then, she appeared to have quite simply lied about what the law says to get there.
How much merit do you think it will have when in front of a full jury? One that needs to unanimously decide beyond a reasonable doubt that somehow Comey lied about something that was true going by the evidence presented. When unlike in a grand jury Halligan can't claim Comey needs to testify or that they can just take her word there's more evidence that she hasn't shown.
Last edited:
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,219
- 124,536
- 3,645
(Didn't read it ^^)
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
You may prattle on all you want - your opinion means nothing, and has zero effect on what happens here.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,219
- 124,536
- 3,645
As i said... he ^^ linked it, but didn't read a single word of it.
You are right. Guess what what this judge says has. So I'll accept you know nothing about "the merits" of the case.
M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
That's my suspicion too.
TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 45,952
- 68,063
- 3,615
It doesn't matter.
Comey is still a corrupt POS.
And, it is not over yet.
Comey is still a corrupt POS.
And, it is not over yet.
candycorn
Diamond Member
There was no evidence
Similar threads
New Topics
-
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 0
-
-
Zone1 Ever have a moment of stress and then you just sense that G-d is there for you and has your back?- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 3
-
