I guess Im not well versed on the prison life.. but to me.. just being somewhere where I dont have freedoms to do what I want is punishment. They cannot see their families whenever they want...
How would you think the person that was murdered might feel if he/she was able to do so? We're forgetting one very important thing here. The person that was killed in the commission of a crime has been greatly inconvienced if not worse. Do we completely forget this fact so we don't make it difficult on the person who committed the crime?
[What about all the rest of them? The ones that WERE innocent?
My father used to tell me that everybody in prison always swore that they were innocent... I think not. While I do agree with you that from time to time an innocent person is arrested, conviceted and sent to prison and maybe even death row but that is far more the exception rather than the rule. There are 1000's of people on death row. I don't think justice is served by not executing those on death row just because 1 of those 1000 people may be innocent. You can bet that the 1 in a 1000 guys that is actually innocent is not what you would call a "model" citizen. What about the rights of the people that were murdered? Don't they count or once they have been killed do they suddenly become a non-issue?
HOW can you possibly justify executing an innocent person...YOU need to be willing to take his place you moron...
Cameron Todd Willingham was executed on February 17, 2004, for setting fire to his own one-story home, a blaze that killed his three young daughters (1-year-old twins and their 2-year-old sister). Willingham was convicted and sent to death row on a hastily executed arson investigation and jurors suspicion over the fact that he managed to escape the fire himself. But he maintained his innocence for years, right until he was strapped to the gurney.
"I am an innocent man, convicted of a crime I did not commit, he said in his final statement. "I have been persecuted for 12 years for something I did not do."
Ten months later, on Dec. 9, 2004, the Chicago Tribune published an investigative article that cast serious doubt on Willingham's guilt.
"While Texas authorities dismissed his protests, a Tribune investigation of his case shows that Willingham was prosecuted and convicted based primarily on arson theories that have since been repudiated by scientific advances," wrote staff reporters Steve Mills and Maurice Possley. "According to four fire experts consulted by the Tribune, the original investigation was flawed, and it is even possible the fire was accidental."
Among the experts was Louisiana Fire Chief Kendall Ryland, who said it "made me sick to think this guy was executed based on this investigation. They executed this guy, and they've just got no idea -- at least not scientifically -- if he set the fire, or if the fire was even intentionally set."
"Did anybody know about this prior to his execution?" asked Dorinda Brokofsky, one of the jurors who sent him to die. "Now I will have to live with this for the rest of my life. Maybe this man was innocent."
200 Executions and Counting: Texas Gov. Rick Perry's Cruel Death Tally | Rights and Liberties | AlterNet