Why am I even arguing with you in the first place when you clearly don't know anything about the Bible?
So, you don't have a link then for these interesting scientific findings?
Sexuality in humans is vdesigned to keep a long term bond to raise a child to independence. Animals are independent in 8 weeks and dont hae sexuality. They copulate based on hormones alone.
Human sexuality is based on the need to create a long term bond to parent a child. Love and the hormone oxytocin is involved.
In all fairness gays can have children and many do. They can also adopt and create successful families
You may want to check your facts on that one since there are a lot of animals in the world. example:
19 Animals That Stay With Their Parents the Longest
Agreed...
A recent study in the journal
Science claimed to âreveal insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior.â Following the studyâs release, an above-the-fold, front-page headline in
The New York Times declared, âMany genes influence same-sex sexuality, not a single âgay gene.ââ
â
This is not entirely news. A 1991 study examined the likelihood of both twins being gay. The chance of two identical twins being gay was 52%; the frequency of fraternal twins being gay was only 22%. If homosexuality resulted from genetic transmission, one might expect 100% gay identical twins. Yet, 52% for identical twins compared with 22% for fraternal twins suggests genetics play some role, although not entirely, in the development of sexual orientation.
This new study notwithstanding, today, the relative contributions of nature and nurture remain unknown.
Heterosexuality as Default
Although theorizing origins of both same-sex relations and other-sex relations are found in Platoâs Symposium, the terms âhomosexualityâ and âheterosexualityâ were first coined in 1869âin fact, by a journalistâa time when scientific speculation about same-sex feelings, behaviors, and attractions flourished. Then and now, heterosexualityâs origins were taken for granted, requiring no need for further study.
Sigmund Freud was an exception. Despite his own theorizing about âinversionâsâ etiology, a 1914 footnote to
Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality noted that âfrom the point of view of psycho-analysis, the exclusive sexual interest felt by men for women is also a problem that needs elucidating and is not a self-evident fact based upon an attraction that is ultimately of a chemical nature.â
Freudâs caveat notwithstanding, researchers often, and implicitly, treat heterosexualityâneeded to propagate the speciesâas a default position requiring no explanation. Consequently, headlines trumpeting genetic âcausesâ of heterosexuality are unlikely as no one is looking for them.
Patients Ask âWhy Am I Gay?â
In clinical practice, gay patients sometimes ask therapists âwhyâ they are gay.
What motivates the question? When one has a stigmatized identityâand gay identities are still stigmatized todayâperhaps a therapist can provide an etiological narrative that makes sense to the patient. However, depending on the therapistâs training, beliefs, and biases, patients might conceptualize their homosexuality as good (ânormal,â âborn gayâ), bad (âmental disorder,â âunforgivable sinâ), or childish and immature (âinfantile sexuality,â âdevelopmental arrestâ).
Occasionally, although less commonly than in the past, gay patients encounter therapists who introduce the issue of why the patient is gay. Of course, it would be highly unusual for a therapist to raise similar questions with straight patients. Heterosexual patients rarely ask therapists why they are straight, and one would be hard pressed to find many heterosexual patients willing to spend time and money on such a âtreatment.â