Zone1 Can anyone show any reason, other than guilt, to prevent the release of the Epstein files?

So nothing specific that yuo can think of?
Sure.

Mira Lago Files - Nothing happened.
34 accounting errors turned into felonies = Unconditionally discharged
Georgia election fraud - Nada
Emoluments clause nonsense = nowhere
Impeachment = Failed in Senate
Not a single J6 insurrection charge
 
.

Thanks. I had never heard of him, and I have several friends who spend a huge amount of their time in prayer, who will be interested in learning about his experiences, and more.

More prayer can never be too much.

God Bless you and Dr. Zadai.

.
I do not comprehend the how....
but after I wrote to my future third wife through a Christian internet dating forum....
she was somehow told that I was going to be her second husband and that she should fast and pray for me for thirty five days. For three days per week for four weeks, she drank only fruit juice, no solid food, [even though she was working forty plus hours per week at two Ecuadorian Rose Plantations]. For the fifth week only fruit juices for the full seven days, and Jesus would somehow wake her up and get her to pray for me. My wife is a Pentecostal or Charismatic Prophetess and she did a deliverance Ministry on me from three thousand miles away from me. I was in Nova Scotia, Canada back then and she was in Quito, Ecuador. What is kind of funny is that I am very different from her. I would be termed Messianic Gentile and thirty years ago my mentors did not get along very well with her favourite teachers and church leaders.
 
Because tRump installed loyalists in the presiding positions.

DERP
Would it have been intelligent of him to promote the people who cooperated in the various attempts to impeach him on a "trumped up case?"

Should President Trump have left James Comey in charge of the FBI?

Should he have brought back Hillary to be Secretary of State?
 
Would it have been intelligent of him to promote the people who cooperated in the various attempts to impeach him on a "trumped up case?"

Should President Trump have left James Comey in charge of the FBI?

Should he have brought back Hillary to be Secretary of State?
And Kamala as Border Czar!
 
Would it have been intelligent of him to promote the people who cooperated in the various attempts to impeach him on a "trumped up case?"

Should President Trump have left James Comey in charge of the FBI?

Should he have brought back Hillary to be Secretary of State?
Comey a huge contributor for tRump's first election.

Clinton did a great job as SoS.

But no, I didn't expect to keep them in those position.

However, blindly loyal cronies are not the answer either.

The FBI in particular is supposed to be independent, not loyalist.
 
Comey a huge contributor for tRump's first election.

Clinton did a great job as SoS.

But no, I didn't expect to keep them in those position.

However, blindly loyal cronies are not the answer either.
No, just people with a similar set of goals to the elected leader.
The FBI in particular is supposed to be independent, not loyalist.
Why, would you want such a powerful agency to be independent, and not answerable to elected officials?
 
I've answered that question many times. Judges froze them until the youngest victims became legal age, which is 2025.
You have a link to prove that?

It is literally the first time I've heard it.

It makes zero sense, being that a person does not lose their right to privacy by coming of age.
 
Can anyone show any reason, other than guilt, to prevent the release of the Epstein files?

Seriously.

What other reason could there possibly be?

I really wanna know.
Ask the dems, they are the ones refusing to release everything.
 
Are you serious?

That's a post, not a news story, by someone calling themselves "policygirlsayswhat."

Is that you, by chance?

Either way, it does not say what you claim:

Despite the conspiracy theories spreading online there is no evidence that Biden intentionally kept Epstein’s documents hidden, therefore it’s not a “democratic hoax” as Trump claims. The reason the Epstein files are not public is straightforward. Federal judges sealed them to protect victims and because the law requires it. Until those judges lift the seals no president can release those documents no matter who is named in them.

Nothing about the victims turning of age.
 
Are you serious?

That's a post, not a news story, by someone calling themselves "policygirlsayswhat."

Is that you, by chance?

Either way, it does not say what you claim:

Despite the conspiracy theories spreading online there is no evidence that Biden intentionally kept Epstein’s documents hidden, therefore it’s not a “democratic hoax” as Trump claims. The reason the Epstein files are not public is straightforward. Federal judges sealed them to protect victims and because the law requires it. Until those judges lift the seals no president can release those documents no matter who is named in them.

Nothing about the victims turning of age.
From my posted link:

From 2021 through 2025 when Biden was president the Epstein files were under strict federal court orders. Federal judges controlled the records to protect the privacy of trafficking victims including minors. Biden could not overrule those protections and no president can bypass federal judges to release sealed court evidence to the public.

Regardless of the reason that the files were sealed. They were. So "Why didn't Biden release them" has been answered.
 
Last edited:
From my posted link:

From 2021 through 2025 when Biden was president the Epstein files were under strict federal court orders. Federal judges controlled the records to protect the privacy of trafficking victims including minors. Biden could not overrule those protections and no president can bypass federal judges to release sealed court evidence to the public.

Regardless of the reason that the files were sealed. They were. So "Why didn't Biden release them" has been answered.
The same privacy concerns are still valid.

People dont lose their privacy because a president you dont like gets elected.
 
15th post
Are you concerned for these people's privacy, or you just don't want the files to be made public?
I'm concerned about the privacy of the alleged victims as well as the privacy of those who may be accused, particularly accused by Epstein.

Democrats have very bizarrely decided that Jeffrey Epstein is a paragon of truthfulness, so long as he is accusing or somebody, they don't like.

But, no matter who accused who of what, only Epstein and Maxwell were indicted, so those are the only names that should be released. Redact the names of the innocent, and the innocent until proven guilty, and i'm fine with releasing every word of it.

We've seen way more than enough in the last nine years of smear campaigns based on little evidence coming from our own justice department.
 
No, just people with a similar set of goals to the elected leader.
They all wanna make tRump rich, embarrass us on the world stage, and destroy our democracy?

I kinda doubt it.
Why, would you want such a powerful agency to be independent, and not answerable to elected officials?
Dude, why would you NOT?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom