Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure.So nothing specific that yuo can think of?
I do not comprehend the how.....
Thanks. I had never heard of him, and I have several friends who spend a huge amount of their time in prayer, who will be interested in learning about his experiences, and more.
More prayer can never be too much.
God Bless you and Dr. Zadai.
.
Because tRump installed loyalists in the presiding positions.Sure.
Mira Lago Files - Nothing happened.
34 accounting errors turned into felonies = Unconditionally discharged
Georgia election fraud - Nada
Emoluments clause nonsense = nowhere
Would it have been intelligent of him to promote the people who cooperated in the various attempts to impeach him on a "trumped up case?"Because tRump installed loyalists in the presiding positions.
DERP
Two assassination attemptsBecause tRump installed loyalists in the presiding positions.
DERP
And Kamala as Border Czar!Would it have been intelligent of him to promote the people who cooperated in the various attempts to impeach him on a "trumped up case?"
Should President Trump have left James Comey in charge of the FBI?
Should he have brought back Hillary to be Secretary of State?
Comey a huge contributor for tRump's first election.Would it have been intelligent of him to promote the people who cooperated in the various attempts to impeach him on a "trumped up case?"
Should President Trump have left James Comey in charge of the FBI?
Should he have brought back Hillary to be Secretary of State?
No, just people with a similar set of goals to the elected leader.Comey a huge contributor for tRump's first election.
Clinton did a great job as SoS.
But no, I didn't expect to keep them in those position.
However, blindly loyal cronies are not the answer either.
Why, would you want such a powerful agency to be independent, and not answerable to elected officials?The FBI in particular is supposed to be independent, not loyalist.
I've answered that question many times. Judges froze them until the youngest victims became legal age, which is 2025.Why are you dodging my question?
You have a link to prove that?I've answered that question many times. Judges froze them until the youngest victims became legal age, which is 2025.
Ask the dems, they are the ones refusing to release everything.Can anyone show any reason, other than guilt, to prevent the release of the Epstein files?
Seriously.
What other reason could there possibly be?
I really wanna know.
You have a link to prove that?
It is literally the first time I've heard it.
It makes zero sense, being that a person does not lose their right to privacy by coming of age.
Are you serious?
From my posted link:Are you serious?
That's a post, not a news story, by someone calling themselves "policygirlsayswhat."
Is that you, by chance?
Either way, it does not say what you claim:
Despite the conspiracy theories spreading online there is no evidence that Biden intentionally kept Epstein’s documents hidden, therefore it’s not a “democratic hoax” as Trump claims. The reason the Epstein files are not public is straightforward. Federal judges sealed them to protect victims and because the law requires it. Until those judges lift the seals no president can release those documents no matter who is named in them.
Nothing about the victims turning of age.
From my posted link:
From 2021 through 2025 when Biden was president the Epstein files were under strict federal court orders. Federal judges controlled the records to protect the privacy of trafficking victims including minors. Biden could not overrule those protections and no president can bypass federal judges to release sealed court evidence to the public.
The same privacy concerns are still valid.Regardless of the reason that the files were sealed. They were. So "Why didn't Biden release them" has been answered.
Are you concerned for these people's privacy, or you just don't want the files to be made public?The same privacy concerns are still valid.
People dont lose their privacy because a president you dont like gets elected.
I'm concerned about the privacy of the alleged victims as well as the privacy of those who may be accused, particularly accused by Epstein.Are you concerned for these people's privacy, or you just don't want the files to be made public?
They all wanna make tRump rich, embarrass us on the world stage, and destroy our democracy?No, just people with a similar set of goals to the elected leader.
Dude, why would you NOT?Why, would you want such a powerful agency to be independent, and not answerable to elected officials?
Answer the OP.Why didn't Biden release them ?