Campi Flegrei, an incipient caldera event?

Well, to be fair, there never was any Biden/Obama/Bush/or Clinton derangement syndrome.

-blinks-

tenor.gif


 

To reiterate without expounding, while many on the Left are in a roil over Trump things he has not even done, the criticisms of these other presidents was all mostly based in legitimate topics of real concern.

I don't remember anyone on the Left ever calling these other people a tyrant or dictator trying to take over the world, committing treason again them, or threatening to murder or TRYING to murder them and other government officials.

ONLY democrats have done all this and much much more earning the moniker: TDS.

Now back to geology.
 
LOL None of those Presidents were ever as deranged or stupid as Trump has proven himself to be.

Is this a science thread, or a political thread?

-looks up-

Yep, this should be about science, not you vomiting up your political crap because you have to spread it everywhere.

And don't cry, pout, or think I am pointing you out. I have been saying this in here for well over a decade whenever somebody starts vomiting their political opinions in a place it does not belong.

Now, are you here to actually discuss science, or to vomit up mindless political crap?
 
That's actually a "small" one in the area of supervolcanos, but it is worrisome because of the location, and slightly puzzling because it does not appear to be located above a fixed hotspot that the crust moves over like Yellowstone and because it is located in an area that should already be "dead" when it comes to volcanos.

From what we understand about how volcanos are formed, the majority are inland of an active subduction zone. That is why the volcanos north of San Francisco up to Canada are all still active, and those south of there are all dead. The mountains of the Sierras north of SF are active, with various forms of stratovolcanoes resting above pools of magma in various states.

And to the south, increasingly what is seen are "ghost volcanos". The volcano is no longer there, it has been eroded away and all that is left is a giant chunk of granite sitting where the magma chamber used to be.



That is why Long Valley is a bit of a puzzle, it does not match what we understand of such features. The subduction of the Farallon Plate to the west ended over 30 million years ago, so there should no longer be a slab down there melting to create more volcanos. Yet there it is, still active. Only a single eruption that they have discovered, but a resurgent magma dome and continuing activity in the magma chamber.

In a way, the reverse of a puzzle over the Yellowstone Hotspot. That has been throwing out multiple highly explosive eruptions, even when it was sitting over an area that should have been throwing out much more docile eruptions and creating stratovolcanoes.

So is Long Valley in the process of dying, or is something still fueling it and it can erupt again? They simply do not know, so are keeping a close eye on it.

The Valles Caldera in New Mexico is much the same as the Long Valley. At least two eruptions between 1.2 and 1.6 mya, and once again sitting in an area that it should not exist. Where off-shore subduction had ended over 45 mya, and there should be nothing that we know of that is driving it. And it also is dormant but still active.

I am glad to see you post from Nick Zentner. If you would listen to some of his lectures concerning the origins of the Yellowstone hot spot, you will find that it originated in a LIP off the coast of North America, much further south than the remnants of it in the coastal ranges of Oregon and Washington. The Crooked River Caldera is one of its early calderas as it progressed into continental crust. Undoubtedly some buried calderas between there and the calderas in Nevada, Oregon, and Idaho.
 
Is this a science thread, or a political thread?

-looks up-

Yep, this should be about science, not you vomiting up your political crap because you have to spread it everywhere.

And don't cry, pout, or think I am pointing you out. I have been saying this in here for well over a decade whenever somebody starts vomiting their political opinions in a place it does not belong.

Now, are you here to actually discuss science, or to vomit up mindless political crap?
But you are not offended by your rightwingnut buddies posting political crap in this thread. LOL
 
Is this a science thread, or a political thread?

-looks up-

Yep, this should be about science, not you vomiting up your political crap because you have to spread it everywhere.

And don't cry, pout, or think I am pointing you out. I have been saying this in here for well over a decade whenever somebody starts vomiting their political opinions in a place it does not belong.

Now, are you here to actually discuss science, or to vomit up mindless political crap?
LOL So you want more science. Here is an interesting volcano where there should be none;

 
As I said, I detest it from either side. And now I know exactly how seriously to take you.

Have a nice day.
And I know exactly where your morality lies if you feel the need to defend a child rapist and convicted felon that a majority of idiots saddled this nation with.
 
LOL So you want more science. Here is an interesting volcano where there should be none;

No, not where there should be none, but where they are uncommon. Volcanic island arcs can be quite large. It all depends on the plate being subducted.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom