jacksonlamb
Platinum Member
- Feb 3, 2026
- 1,645
- 896
- 893
You made the claim, skippy. Get to it.No you just said false information. It’s up to you to prove it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You made the claim, skippy. Get to it.No you just said false information. It’s up to you to prove it.
I didn’t make any claim. I stated the fact that the ballots were seized with a warrant signed by a judge.You made the claim, skippy. Get to it.
... which can and has been challenged.I didn’t make any claim. I stated the fact that the ballots were seized with a warrant signed by a judge.
Liberals FREAK OUT Over MAGA Sheriff SEIZING BALLOTS As DEMOCRATS BEG Supreme Court To STOP HIM!
Commentary:
More power to Sheriff Chad Bianco.
Normal people should be asking themselves, why are the Democrats so dead set against verifying that our elections are on the up and up?"
Is it because when the horrendous amount of election fraud is discovered, the people will demand that the Democrats be tried, convicted, and sentenced to be publicly hanged for corruption, giving aid and comfort to domestic and foreign enemies of the United States.
The Democrats are probably exploding in their panties as they wait for one of their judges to stop him.
People should ask themselves, why are the Democrats so dead set against verifying that our elections are on the up and up?
If Democrats honestly thought there was no fraud, why are they so upset about ballots being checked?
Simply, if the election was without fraud, Democrats should be ecstatic about allowing the investigation, which would prove that they conducted a free and fair election, and with that, they could then point at the Republican Sheriff as being a biased SOB. But apparently, Democrats have a lot to hide and won't allow any investigation to shed light on their fraud.
But not overturned. And the challenge has been mounted by Ron Bonta, the CA A.G. APPOINTED by Newsom who was the only person to benefit from crooked elections on redistricting and the recall. If there was nothing illegal done in the redistricting election, a recount does no harm, if there was something illegal, it needs to be identified and the people in charge need to be prosecuted.... which can and has been challenged.
IFYSSBut not overturned. And the challenge has been mounted by Ron Bonta, the CA A.G. APPOINTED by Newsom who was the only person to benefit from crooked elections on redistricting and the recall. If there was nothing illegal done in the redistricting election, a recount does no harm, if there was something illegal, it needs to be identified and the people in charge need to be prosecuted.